agentsclimarketplace

Pm stakeholder communication

Skill julianoczkowski/product-manager/skills/pm-stakeholder-communication

Build a Pragmatic stakeholder communication plan and status updates that expose risk early and speak each audience's language. Use when the PM asks to manage stakeholders, plan comms, write an exec/status update, a project status report, a steering-committee update, or "keep everyone aligned". Covers the Identify→Analyze→Communicate steps, the Influence×Importance matrix, and the four metric categories. Produces a Stakeholder Communication Plan and a Status Update as a Markdown or Word .docx artifact.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add julianoczkowski/product-manager --skill pm-stakeholder-communication

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.8 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Stakeholder Communications (Pragmatic Framework: Planning → Stakeholder Communications)

Executives communicate in spreadsheets, not screenshots. Track trends, not absolute numbers. Manage proactive communications from strategy through execution.

See ../pm-copilot/references/framework.md for the primitives.

Three steps

Identify → Analyze → Communicate.

  1. Identify every stakeholder or group affected by or influencing the work.
  2. Analyze each on two axes and place them on the matrix.
  3. Communicate on a plan tuned to each quadrant.

Influence = informal authority — the power to facilitate or impede an objective; the ability to persuade or coerce others toward a course of action. Importance = formal authority — the priority given to satisfying that stakeholder's needs; their power to drive, change, or cancel the work.

Stakeholder Management Matrix (2×2)

Y = Influence (informal authority), X = Importance (formal authority):

Low ImportanceHigh Importance
High InfluenceKeep SatisfiedManage Closely
Low InfluenceMonitorKeep Informed

Communication plan — When / How

  • When? How often · what stages · what depth.
  • How? What format · what channel.
  • Common errors to avoid: surprising stakeholders with bad news (ignore/delay/surprise); relying solely on email/electronic comms; delivering disparate status to different stakeholders.

Metric categories (pick what's meaningful per stakeholder)

  • Value — LTV; LTV:CAC.
  • Quality — defects; % test coverage; fix-to-feature ratio; return rate.
  • Progress — lead & cycle time; velocity/burndown; % dependencies.
  • Satisfaction — NPS; CSAT; renewal rate; time-to-value; customer effort (CES).

Interview the user (batch questions)

  1. Who are the stakeholders (people/groups) touched by this work?
  2. For each — how much influence (informal) and importance (formal) do they have?
  3. What outcome/metric does each one actually care about?
  4. What cadence and channel fits each (weekly meeting, email digest, dashboard)?
  5. What's the current status and any risks to surface?

Artifact templates

Stakeholder Communication Plan

# Stakeholder Communication Plan — <Project/Product>

**Company:** <company>  ·  **Feature / Product:** <feature / product name>
**Author:** <author>  ·  **Date created:** <date>

| Stakeholder | Category | Communicator | Channel | Artifact | Frequency | Metric Category | Specific Metrics |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Angela (SVP Sales) | Manage Closely | Jeff (PM) | Weekly meeting (+ email) | Initiative status template | Weekly, Thursday | Value | LTV |
| <name/role> | Keep Informed | | | | | | |
| <name/role> | Keep Satisfied | | | | | | |
| <name/role> | Monitor | | | | | | |

Status Update (Initiative-based)

# Status Update — <Product/Release> — <date>

**Company:** <company>  ·  **Feature / Product:** <feature / product name>
**Author:** <author>  ·  **Date created:** <date>

| Initiative | Description | Delivery | Status | Path to Green | Update | What's Next |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| <name> | <goal of this work> | <date/quarter> | 🟢 On track | — | <latest since last report> | <planned work> |
| <name> | <goal> | <date> | 🟡 Elevated risk | <steps to recover> | <milestones met / risks / scope changes> | <next> |

**Status legend:** 🟢 On track · 🟡 Elevated risk · 🔴 High risk · 🔵 Completed · ⚪ Not started · ⚫ On hold.

(For an exec audience, offer a metric-based variant: Business Objective | Metric Category | Metric to Move | Goal State | Current State | Initiative | Outcome [Measuring / Positive / Negative / Uncertain].)

Deliver the artifact

Follow ../pm-copilot/references/artifact-output.md: confirm inputs, ask Markdown or .docx, write the .md, convert to .docx on request via your environment's native document-creation capability. Deliver the plan and a first status update. Then offer the next stage: pm-launch-plan as the release nears its market window.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most docs writing skills give in ~1.1k tokens

Counted across 1,951 of the 3,904 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Use third-person for skill descriptionsin 54 of 1951, across 35 files
  • Start descriptions with Use whenin 43 of 1951, across 29 files
  • Run baseline scenarios before writing any skillin 40 of 1951, across 26 files
  • Use active voicein 40 of 1951, across 36 files
  • Map file responsibilities before defining tasksin 36 of 1951, across 29 files
  • Use checkbox syntax for tracking stepsin 35 of 1951, across 27 files
  • Ask one question at a timein 35 of 1951
  • Offer execution options after saving the planin 33 of 1951, across 24 files
  • Include complete code in every stepin 33 of 1951, across 27 files
  • Design units with clear boundaries and interfacesin 31 of 1951, across 23 files
  • Announce the skill usage at the startin 30 of 1951
  • Verify agent compliance after adding the skillin 29 of 1951, across 17 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Ask the user for Markdown or .docx format
  • Interview the user to gather scenario details
  • Identify all stakeholders affected by the work
  • Analyze stakeholders using influence and importance axes
  • Place stakeholders on the management matrix
  • Select meaningful metrics for each stakeholder

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.