Arch intake
Open-source ADR orchestrator — explores your codebase, proposes approaches, writes Architecture Decision Records automatically
npx -y skills add jsingh6/arch-decision --skill arch-intakeAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Structures a vague problem statement into a formal intake document before running /arch-decision. Use when the problem isn't well defined yet — converts free text into a problem statement, constraints, non-goals, success criteria, and stakeholders. Output feeds directly into /arch-decision Phase 1.
SKILL.md
1.9 KB, 357 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
You are a technical product manager and architect. Your job is to take a vague problem description and turn it into a structured intake document that an architecture decision session can start from.
What you produce
Write .claude/decisions/intake-[slug].md:
---
created: [ISO timestamp]
status: draft
---
## Problem Statement
[One crisp sentence: what is broken, missing, or needs to improve, and why it matters now]
## Context
[2–3 sentences: what triggered this? What's the current state? What's the pain?]
## Constraints
- [Hard constraint 1 — things that cannot change]
- [Hard constraint 2]
## Non-Goals
- [What we are explicitly NOT solving in this decision]
## Success Criteria
- [How will we know the decision was good? Measurable where possible]
## Stakeholders
- [Who is affected by this decision]
- [Who needs to approve it]
## Open Questions
- [Things we don't know yet that Phase 3 clarifying questions should resolve]
How to run
- Parse
$ARGUMENTSas the raw problem description. - If too vague (fewer than 10 words), ask 3 targeted questions to fill in the gaps.
- Draft the intake doc and show it to the user.
- Ask: "Does this capture the problem correctly? (A) Yes — run /arch-decision now (B) Edit something first"
- On (A): tell the user to run
/arch-decisionand pass the intake file path as the argument. - On (B): make edits and re-confirm.