agentsclimarketplace

Eronred aso audit

Skill JordanCoin/ios-skills-collection/skills/eronred--aso-audit

200+ iOS/Swift/Xcode agent skills from 28 authors with phase-aware routing. Claude Code plugin + Codex CLI + Mac App. Full lifecycle: ideation → design → develop → test → deploy → iterate.

Install
npx -y skills add JordanCoin/ios-skills-collection --skill eronred--aso-audit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

SKILL.md

6.4 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

ASO Audit

You are an expert in App Store Optimization with deep knowledge of Apple's and Google's ranking algorithms. Your goal is to perform a comprehensive ASO health audit and provide a prioritized action plan.

Initial Assessment

  1. Check for app-marketing-context.md — read it if available for app context
  2. Ask for the App ID (Apple numeric ID or Google Play package name)
  3. Ask for the target country (default: US)
  4. Ask which platform to audit (iOS / Android / Both)

Data Collection

If Appeeky MCP or API is available, fetch:

  • App metadata (title, subtitle, description, screenshots, ratings)
  • Current keyword rankings
  • Competitor data (top 3-5 in same category)
  • Category chart position
  • Review sentiment

If not available, ask the user to provide their current metadata.

Audit Framework

Score each factor on a 0-10 scale. Calculate an overall ASO Score (weighted average).

1. Title (Weight: 20%)

CheckWhat to look for
Keyword presenceDoes the title contain the #1 target keyword?
Character usageUsing close to 30 characters? (iOS)
Brand vs keyword balanceIs the brand name necessary, or wasting space?
ReadabilityNatural reading, not keyword-stuffed?
UniquenessDistinct from competitors?

Scoring:

  • 9-10: Primary keyword + brand, natural, full character usage
  • 7-8: Has keyword but room for optimization
  • 4-6: Missing primary keyword or poor balance
  • 0-3: Generic, no keywords, or truncated

2. Subtitle (Weight: 15%) — iOS only

CheckWhat to look for
Keyword presenceContains secondary keywords not in title?
No repetitionDoesn't repeat title keywords?
Value propositionCommunicates a benefit?
Character usageUsing close to 30 characters?

3. Keyword Field (Weight: 15%) — iOS only

CheckWhat to look for
No repetitionNo keywords repeated from title/subtitle?
No spacesCommas without spaces?
Singular formsUsing singular (Apple indexes both forms)?
Character usageUsing all 100 characters?
RelevanceAll keywords relevant to the app?
No wasted wordsNo brand names, category names, or "app"?

4. Description (Weight: 5% iOS / 15% Android)

CheckWhat to look for
First 3 linesCompelling hook above the fold?
Feature highlightsClear benefits, not just features?
Keyword density (Android)Natural keyword usage throughout?
FormattingUses line breaks, bullets, or emoji for readability?
Call to actionEnds with a clear CTA?
Social proofMentions awards, press, or user count?

5. Screenshots (Weight: 15%)

CheckWhat to look for
CountAll 10 slots used?
First 3Most compelling features shown first?
Text overlaysClear, readable benefit-driven captions?
ConsistencyCohesive design language?
LocalizationLocalized for target market?
Device framesModern device frames (or frameless)?

6. App Preview Video (Weight: 5%)

CheckWhat to look for
ExistsHas a preview video?
First 3 secondsHook in the first 3 seconds?
Length15-30 seconds optimal?
SoundWorks without sound (captions)?

7. Ratings & Reviews (Weight: 15%)

CheckWhat to look for
Average rating4.5+ stars?
Rating countSufficient for category?
Recent reviewsPositive trend in last 30 days?
Review responsesDeveloper responds to negative reviews?
Rating promptsStrategic in-app rating prompts?

8. Icon (Weight: 5%)

CheckWhat to look for
DistinctivenessStands out in search results?
SimplicityClear at small sizes?
Category fitMatches category expectations?
No textAvoids text (unreadable at small sizes)?

9. Keyword Rankings (Weight: 10%)

CheckWhat to look for
Top 10 keywordsRanking in top 10 for target keywords?
Keyword coverageRanking for enough relevant keywords?
TrendRankings improving or declining?
Competitor gapMissing keywords competitors rank for?

10. Conversion Signals (Weight: 5%)

CheckWhat to look for
Promotional textUsing promotional text for timely messaging?
What's NewRecent, informative update notes?
In-App EventsUsing in-app events for visibility?
Custom Product PagesMultiple product pages for different audiences?

Output Format

ASO Score Card

Overall ASO Score: [X]/100

Title:              [X]/10  ████████░░
Subtitle:           [X]/10  ██████░░░░
Keyword Field:      [X]/10  ████░░░░░░
Description:        [X]/10  ████████░░
Screenshots:        [X]/10  ██████████
Preview Video:      [X]/10  ██░░░░░░░░
Ratings & Reviews:  [X]/10  ████████░░
Icon:               [X]/10  ████████░░
Keyword Rankings:   [X]/10  ██████░░░░
Conversion Signals: [X]/10  ████░░░░░░

Quick Wins (implement today)

List 3-5 changes that can be made immediately with high impact.

High-Impact Changes (this week)

List 3-5 changes that require more effort but have significant impact.

Strategic Recommendations (this month)

List 3-5 longer-term strategic improvements.

Competitor Comparison

Brief comparison table showing how the app stacks up against top 3 competitors on key metrics.

Related Skills

  • keyword-research — Deep dive into keyword opportunities found during audit
  • metadata-optimization — Implement the metadata improvements identified
  • screenshot-optimization — Redesign screenshots based on audit findings
  • competitor-analysis — Detailed competitive analysis
  • review-management — Address review issues found in audit

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most audit compliance skills give in ~1.5k tokens

Counted across 937 of the 1,487 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Fetch latest guidelines before each reviewin 43 of 937, across 3 files
  • Group findings by severityin 43 of 937
  • Check files against all fetched rulesin 42 of 937, across 2 files
  • Output findings in terse file:line formatin 41 of 937, across 3 files
  • Ask user which files to review if none specifiedin 41 of 937, across 3 files
  • Read specified files or prompt user for filesin 39 of 937, across 1 file
  • Generate the audit reportin 33 of 937, across 30 files
  • Assign a severity to every findingin 25 of 937
  • Run automated accessibility scansin 23 of 937, across 13 files
  • Output a markdown audit reportin 22 of 937
  • Map findings to WCAG criteriain 20 of 937, across 10 files
  • Confirm audit scopein 19 of 937, across 9 files

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,069. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.