Debug
Systematic debugging workflow for tracking down bugs and issuesFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add jmylchreest/aide --skill debugAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 16 stars16 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
6.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Debug Mode
Recommended model tier: smart (opus) - this skill requires complex reasoning
Systematic approach to identifying and fixing bugs.
Prerequisites
Before starting:
- Get the exact error message or unexpected behavior description
- Identify the entry point or trigger for the bug
- Note any relevant environment details (Node version, OS, etc.)
Workflow
Step 1: Reproduce the Issue
Goal: Confirm the bug exists and understand its behavior.
# Run the failing code/test
npm test -- --grep "failing test"
# OR
node path/to/script.js
Document:
- Exact error message
- Steps to trigger
- Expected vs actual behavior
- Is it consistent or intermittent?
If cannot reproduce:
- Check environment differences
- Look for race conditions
- Check for cached state
Step 2: Locate the Relevant Code
Use tools to find code related to the error:
# Search for function mentioned in stack trace
mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search query="functionName" kind="function"
# Get a structural overview of the suspect file (signatures + line ranges)
mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_outline file="path/to/file.ts"
# Get symbols in suspect file
mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols file="path/to/file.ts"
# Search for error message text in code
Grep for "error message text"
Step 3: Trace the Execution Path
Follow the code flow from entry to error:
- Use
code_outlineon each file in the call chain to understand its structure - Use
code_referencesto find callers of the failing function - Use
Readwith offset/limit to read specific functions in the execution path (use line numbers from the outline) - Check type definitions with
code_search kind="interface"
Outlines help you identify which functions matter, so you can read just those sections.
Step 4: Form Hypotheses
Based on the error type, consider these causes:
| Symptom | Likely Causes |
|---|---|
| "undefined is not a function" | Variable is null/undefined, wrong import |
| "Cannot read property of undefined" | Missing null check, async timing issue |
| "Type error" | Type mismatch, wrong function signature |
| "Maximum call stack" | Infinite recursion, circular reference |
| "Network error" | Bad URL, CORS, timeout, server down |
| "State not updating" | Mutation instead of new object, missing dependency |
Step 5: Validate Hypotheses
Test each hypothesis systematically:
# Add temporary logging
console.log('DEBUG: variable =', JSON.stringify(variable));
# Check with debugger
node --inspect-brk script.js
# Run specific test
npm test -- --grep "test name"
Validation checklist:
- Check variable values at key points
- Verify assumptions about input data
- Test edge cases (null, empty, boundary values)
- Check async ordering
Step 6: Apply the Fix
Rules:
- Change only what's necessary to fix the bug
- Don't refactor unrelated code
- Match existing code patterns
Common fixes:
- Add null/undefined check
- Fix type annotation
- Correct async/await usage
- Fix variable scope
- Add missing initialization
Step 7: Verify the Fix
# Run the originally failing test/scenario
npm test -- --grep "failing test"
# Run related tests
npm test -- --grep "related feature"
# Run full test suite to check for regressions
npm test
Verification criteria:
- Original issue no longer occurs
- Related tests still pass
- No new errors introduced
Failure Handling
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| Cannot reproduce | Check environment, add logging to narrow down |
| Multiple bugs intertwined | Fix one at a time, verify after each |
| Fix causes new failures | Revert, analyze dependencies, try different approach |
| Root cause is in dependency | Check for updates, file issue, implement workaround |
| Bug is in async code | Add proper await, check Promise chains |
When abandoning an approach: If you try a fix direction and abandon it (e.g., revert because it causes regressions), record it as an abandoned approach so future sessions don't repeat it:
./.aide/bin/aide memory add --category=abandoned \
--tags=reason:<why>,approach:<what>,project:<name>,session:<id>,source:discovered \
"ABANDONED: <what was tried>. REASON: <why>. ALTERNATIVE: <new direction>. CONTEXT: <details>"
MCP Tools
mcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_outline- Start here. Get collapsed file skeleton to understand structure before readingmcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_search- Find functions, classes, types involved in the bugmcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_symbols- List all symbols in a filemcp__plugin_aide_aide__code_references- Find all callers of a functionmcp__plugin_aide_aide__memory_search- Check for related past issues
Output Format
## Debug Report: [Issue Title]
### Problem
[What was happening vs what should happen]
### Reproduction
[Steps to reproduce the issue]
### Root Cause
[Identified cause with file:line reference]
[Why the bug occurred]
### Fix Applied
[What was changed and why]
### Verification
- Original issue: FIXED
- Related tests: PASS
- Full suite: PASS
### Prevention
[Optional: How to prevent similar bugs]
Tips
- Always get the full error message and stack trace first
- Don't guess - trace the code path methodically
- One fix at a time - don't bundle unrelated changes
- Remove temporary logging before committing
- Consider if the bug could occur elsewhere
Memory Hygiene
When storing memories from this skill (abandoned approaches, blockers), always:
- Include
source:tag — Usesource:discoveredfor things you found,source:inferredfor deductions - Include scope tags — Add
project:<name>,session:<id>(get project name from git remote or directory; session ID from$AIDE_SESSION_IDor$CLAUDE_SESSION_ID) - Verify codebase claims before storing — If a memory references a file, function, or path, confirm it exists first. See the
memoriseskill for the full verification workflow. - Never use
scope:globalunless storing a user preference