Vibe prep
MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY: invoke only when user types /vibe-prep. Interactive preparation for vibe coding: validate idea, write PRD, design UI, scaffold project. All steps require human approval. Once complete, tells the user to run /vibe-harness for the autonomous coding loop.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add jincinga24-hue/vibestack --skill vibe-prepAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
11.9 KB, ~3.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
/vibe-prep — Interactive Project Preparation
Overview
You are guiding the user through project setup BEFORE autonomous coding begins. Every step is interactive — ask questions, show drafts, wait for approval. Nothing gets finalized without the user saying yes.
After this skill completes, the user runs /vibe-harness for the autonomous coding loop.
Language: Match the user's language.
Step 1: Idea Validation
Check if VALIDATION-REPORT.md exists in the project root.
-
If it exists: Read it. Show the user a summary: idea, GO/NO-GO, MVP features. Ask: "Found an existing validation. Use this, or start fresh?"
-
If it does NOT exist: Ask the user:
"Let's validate your idea first. Options: (a) Full validation with /validate-idea (recommended — 6-step deep dive) (b) Quick validation — tell me your idea in 1-2 sentences (c) Skip — I already know what I want to build"
- If (a): Invoke
/validate-ideausing the Skill tool. Once done, continue. - If (b): Ask for the idea. Run a lightweight check: problem, target user, competitors, risk. Write
VALIDATION-REPORT.md. - If (c): Ask for: idea (one sentence), target user, 3 MVP features. Write a minimal
VALIDATION-REPORT.md.
- If (a): Invoke
GO/NO-GO Gate
- NO-GO: Explain why. Suggest pivots. Stop here.
- CONDITIONAL GO: Show conditions. Ask if they want to proceed.
- GO: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Tech Stack
Ask: "What tech stack do you want? Some options based on your idea:"
Suggest 2-3 options based on the idea type. For example:
- Web app → Next.js + Tailwind, or Python + Flask, or SvelteKit
- Mobile → React Native, or Flutter, or Swift
- CLI tool → Python, or Node.js, or Go
Wait for the user to pick or specify their own.
Step 3: PRD (Product Requirements Document)
Write the PRD with the user:
- Ask: "What's the core problem this solves in one sentence?"
- Ask: "Any features that are explicitly NOT in scope for v1?"
- Draft
docs/PRD.md:
# PRD: [Idea Name]
## Problem
[one sentence]
## Target User
[from validation]
## MVP Features (v1)
1. [feature 1]
- **Acceptance criteria:** [what does "done" look like? specific pass/fail condition]
2. [feature 2]
- **Acceptance criteria:** [measurable pass/fail]
3. [feature 3]
- **Acceptance criteria:** [measurable pass/fail]
## Success Metrics
- [from validation]
## Non-Goals (explicitly out of scope)
- [user's answers]
## Tech Stack
- [chosen stack]
- For each MVP feature, ask: "What does 'done' look like for this feature? Give me a specific pass/fail condition." (e.g. "User can log a poop and see it appear in the history list" not just "log feature works")
- Show the PRD: "Here's the PRD with acceptance criteria. Anything to change?"
- Edit until user says it's good.
Step 4: Project Boundaries & Non-Functionals
Scope it before you build it. Ask the user:
"Before we design the UI, let's set boundaries. Quick answers for each:"
- Privacy: What user data are you touching? Any sensitive info?
- Security: Does this need auth? Roles? What's exposed publicly?
- Performance: Any hard speed limits? (e.g. page load < 2s)
- Scale: How many users do you expect? 10? 1000? 100k?
If the user says "skip" or "don't know", fill in sensible defaults for an MVP and note them.
Add a ## Boundaries & Non-Functionals section to docs/PRD.md:
## Boundaries & Non-Functionals
- **Privacy:** [answer]
- **Security:** [answer]
- **Performance:** [answer]
- **Scale:** [answer]
Show: "Here are the project boundaries. Look right?" Edit until approved.
Step 5: UI/UX Design
Design the UI with the user:
- Ask: "What kind of interface? Dashboard, landing page, mobile app, CLI?"
- Reference the web (IMPORTANT): Ask: "Show me 1-2 websites or apps that have the vibe/layout you want. Drop a URL or name and I'll look it up." If the user provides references, use WebFetch to grab them, screenshot key patterns, and document them in UI-DESIGN.md. Don't invent UI from scratch — borrow from established products.
- Ask: "Walk me through the main user flow — what does someone do when they open the app?"
- If the user provides reference URLs, use WebFetch to capture the page and document key UI patterns (layout, nav, card styles, colour scheme) in the UI-DESIGN doc.
- Draft
docs/UI-DESIGN.md:
# UI Design: [Idea Name]
## Style
- [user's preferences: minimal, colorful, dark, etc.]
- References: [any sites mentioned]
## Pages / Screens
1. [page]: [description + key elements]
2. [page]: [description + key elements]
3. [page]: [description + key elements]
## User Flow
1. User opens app → sees [what]
2. User does [action] → sees [result]
3. ...
## Components
- [component list: navbar, cards, forms, etc.]
## Color / Typography (if specified)
- [any preferences]
- Show: "Here's the UI plan. Want to change anything?"
- Edit until approved.
Step 6: Architecture
Draft the architecture doc based on PRD and UI decisions:
- Write
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md:
# Architecture: [Idea Name]
## Tech Stack
- Frontend: [framework]
- Backend: [framework/API]
- Database: [if any]
- Hosting: [if discussed]
## Folder Structure
[proposed structure]
## Key Libraries
- [lib]: [what for]
## Data Flow
[brief description of how data moves]
- Show: "Here's the architecture. Make sense?"
- Edit until approved.
Step 7: Scaffold Project
Set up the actual project files:
- Create the folder structure from the architecture doc
- Install dependencies (package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
- Create entry point
- Show: "Project scaffolded. Here's what was created:" (list the files)
- Edit until approved.
Step 8: Output Context Documents
Generate three documents that serve as the coding context for the vibe-harness autonomous loop:
docs/PRD.md— finalized from Step 3 (should already exist, verify it's complete)docs/ARCHITECTURE.md— finalized from Step 5 (should already exist, verify it's complete)CLAUDE.md— project guidelines file that:- References PRD, UI-DESIGN, and ARCHITECTURE docs
- Summarizes the project in 2-3 sentences
- Lists key decisions made during prep
- Lists the tech stack
- Describes the folder structure
- Contains any project-specific coding rules from Step 8
Show: "Here are the three context documents for autonomous coding. Look good?" Edit until approved.
IMPORTANT: Live Document Updates
These three documents are living documents. During the vibe-harness autonomous coding loop:
docs/PRD.md— update when features are completed, descoped, or new requirements emergedocs/ARCHITECTURE.md— update when folder structure, data flow, or libraries changeCLAUDE.md— update when new conventions, decisions, or guidelines are established
The Generator agent MUST update these docs as part of each cycle when relevant changes occur. This is NOT optional — stale docs lead to AI confusion in later cycles.
Step 9: Development Standards & Reference
Establish coding standards and reference materials for the AI to follow during autonomous coding.
8a. Ask the user:
"Do you have any coding style preferences or reference projects? For example:
- File naming: camelCase, kebab-case, snake_case?
- File size limit: max lines per file? (recommend 200-400)
- Reference project: any existing codebase or repo to follow as a style guide?
- Component patterns: any preferred patterns? (e.g., functional components, class-based)
- Any other conventions?"
8b. Create docs/REFERENCE.md:
# Development Standards: [Idea Name]
## File Naming
- [convention]: e.g., camelCase for JS files, kebab-case for components
## File Size Limits
- Max [X] lines per file (default: 400)
- If a file exceeds the limit, split into smaller modules
## Code Style
- [language-specific conventions]
- [formatting rules]
## Reference
- [link or description of reference project/codebase, if any]
- [key patterns to follow from the reference]
## Component/Module Patterns
- [how to structure components/modules]
- [naming conventions for functions, variables, classes]
## Import/Export Conventions
- [how to organize imports]
- [default vs named exports]
8c. If the user provides a reference project/repo:
- Read key files from the reference to extract patterns
- Create
docs/reference/folder with example snippets showing the style to follow - Add notes in
REFERENCE.mdpointing to these examples
8d. Update CLAUDE.md to include a section pointing to docs/REFERENCE.md
Show: "Here are the dev standards. Anything to change?" Edit until approved.
Step 10: Git Init & Quality Gates
Set up version control and quality checks for the vibe-harness to use.
9a. Initialize Git
git init(if not already a git repo)- Create
.gitignoreappropriate for the tech stack - Make initial commit with all scaffolded files
9b. Define Quality Gates
Ask: "What quality checks should run after each coding cycle? Defaults:"
Show default gates based on tech stack:
- Lint: ESLint / Pylint / etc.
- Build: Does it compile/build without errors?
- Tests: Do existing tests pass?
- File size: No file exceeds the limit from Step 8
Create docs/QUALITY-GATES.md:
# Quality Gates: [Idea Name]
## After Each Cycle
- [ ] Build passes (no errors)
- [ ] Lint passes (no warnings)
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] No file exceeds [X] lines
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
## Before Merge/Ship
- [ ] Manual review of all changes
- [ ] Test coverage > [X]%
- [ ] All docs up to date
9c. Update CLAUDE.md to reference quality gates
Show: "Git initialized and quality gates set. Ready?" Edit until approved.
Step 11: Handoff
Print this message:
Prep complete! Here's what's ready:
VALIDATION-REPORT.md— idea validateddocs/PRD.md— product requirementsdocs/UI-DESIGN.md— UI/UX plandocs/ARCHITECTURE.md— technical architecturedocs/REFERENCE.md— development standards & coding conventionsdocs/QUALITY-GATES.md— quality gates for each cycleCLAUDE.md— project guidelines (references all docs above)- Project scaffolded with dependencies
- Git initialized with initial commit
Next: Run
/vibe-harnessto start the autonomous 15-cycle coding loop. The dashboard will open automatically and track progress in real time.
Rules
- Every step needs user approval. Never skip ahead without a "yes" or "looks good".
- Search before building. Before choosing a library or approach, ask: "Is there an existing repo or package that does 80% of this?" Use WebSearch to check. Don't reinvent wheels.
- Read official docs. When the user picks a framework, fetch its official quickstart/docs and include key patterns in the ARCHITECTURE doc so the Generator doesn't guess APIs.
- Ask, don't assume. If you're unsure about a preference, ask.
- Show drafts, not final versions. Always present as "here's a draft" so the user feels comfortable editing.
- Match the user's language. Chinese in, Chinese out.
- Keep it conversational. This is a planning session, not a formal process.
- Reference the validation report. Use the data from /validate-idea to pre-fill fields.
- Don't write code yet. Scaffold only. The coding happens in /vibe-harness.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most design frontend skills give in ~3.0k tokens
Counted across 1,169 of the 1,878 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Use CSS variables for color consistencyin 72 of 1169, across 23 files
- Commit to one bold aesthetic direction before codingin 72 of 1169, across 27 files
- Match implementation complexity to the aesthetic visionin 70 of 1169, across 20 files
- Add atmospheric background effects and texturesin 57 of 1169, across 9 files
- Use unexpected spatial compositions and layoutsin 56 of 1169, across 8 files
- Implement real working codein 55 of 1169, across 7 files
- Vary themes and aesthetics across different designsin 48 of 1169, across 7 files
- Launch chromium in headless modein 47 of 1169, across 4 files
- Close the browser when donein 47 of 1169, across 4 files
- Run provided scripts with help flag firstin 47 of 1169, across 4 files
- Wait for network idle statein 47 of 1169, across 4 files
- Use descriptive selectors for elementsin 47 of 1169, across 4 files
Said here and by no other author read
- require user approval for every step
- check for an existing validation report
- write a PRD with the user
- define project boundaries and non-functional requirements
- design UI using web references
- scaffold the project files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.