Refactor
Continuous fullstack delivery loops — orchestrates frontend, backend, and quality subagents (behaviour drivers, engineers, UI/UX specialist, code/security reviewers, architects) in a test → diagnose → fix → review → secure → re-test cycle until the work is production-ready
npx -y skills add jgamaraalv/delivery-loop --skill refactorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
SKILL.md
3.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Refactor
Overview
Improve code structure and readability without changing external behavior. Refactoring is gradual evolution, not revolution. Use this for improving existing code, not rewriting from scratch.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Code is hard to understand or maintain
- Functions/classes are too large
- Code smells need addressing
- Adding features is difficult due to code structure
- User asks "clean up this code", "refactor this", "improve this"
Refactoring Principles
The Golden Rules
- Behavior is preserved - Refactoring doesn't change what the code does, only how
- Small steps - Make tiny changes, test after each
- Version control is your friend - Commit before and after each safe state
- Tests are essential - Without tests, you're not refactoring, you're editing
- One thing at a time - Don't mix refactoring with feature changes
When NOT to Refactor
- Code that works and won't change again (if it ain't broke...)
- Critical production code without tests (add tests first)
- When you're under a tight deadline
- "Just because" - need a clear purpose
Catalog & worked examples
The smell-by-smell BAD/GOOD catalog, extract-method / type-safety / design-pattern
examples, and the refactoring-operations lookup table live in
references/catalog.md. Open it when you hit a specific smell —
it covers: Long Method, Duplicated Code, Large Class, Long Parameter List, Feature Envy,
Primitive Obsession, Magic Numbers/Strings, Nested Conditionals, Dead Code, Inappropriate
Intimacy, plus Strategy / Chain-of-Responsibility patterns.
Refactoring Steps
Safe Refactoring Process
1. PREPARE
- Ensure tests exist (write them if missing)
- Commit current state
- Create feature branch
2. IDENTIFY
- Find the code smell to address
- Understand what the code does
- Plan the refactoring
3. REFACTOR (small steps)
- Make one small change
- Run tests
- Commit if tests pass
- Repeat
4. VERIFY
- All tests pass
- Manual testing if needed
- Performance unchanged or improved
5. CLEAN UP
- Update comments
- Update documentation
- Final commit
Refactoring Checklist
Code Quality
- Functions are small (< 50 lines)
- Functions do one thing
- No duplicated code
- Descriptive names (variables, functions, classes)
- No magic numbers/strings
- Dead code removed
Structure
- Related code is together
- Clear module boundaries
- Dependencies flow in one direction
- No circular dependencies
Type Safety
- Types defined for all public APIs
- No
anytypes without justification - Nullable types explicitly marked
Testing
- Refactored code is tested
- Tests cover edge cases
- All tests pass
Gives 4 of the 12 instructions most refactoring skills give
Counted across 521 of the 525 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- run tests after each changehere, and in 59 of 521, across 56 files
- write tests before refactoringin 27 of 521, across 24 files
- preserve external behaviorhere, and in 26 of 521, across 22 files
- remove dead codehere, and in 25 of 521, across 24 files
- make small incremental changeshere, and in 20 of 521, across 17 files
- break the implementation into tiny commitsin 18 of 521, across 5 files
- ask the user about alternative optionsin 17 of 521, across 4 files
- create a GitHub issue with the planin 17 of 521, across 4 files
- explore the repository to verify assertionsin 17 of 521, across 4 files
- interview the user about the refactorin 16 of 521, across 3 files
- check the codebase for test coveragein 16 of 521, across 3 files
- refactor one thing at a timein 16 of 521, across 12 files
Said here and by no other author read
- open the catalog when hitting a specific smell
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.