Pr review fix pipeline
Skill jerseycheese/agent-skills/skills/pr-review-fix-pipeline
Agent skills for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI — shared workflows for testing, code review, issue triage, and dev loop automation.
npx -y skills add jerseycheese/agent-skills --skill pr-review-fix-pipelineAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Autonomous PR review that also applies fixes for non-controversial issues — combines review, fix, test, and commit into a single pipeline. Unlike a read-only review, this writes code. Only use on feature branches where you're comfortable with automatic edits. Trigger on: "review and fix PR", "auto-fix the PR", "clean up this PR automatically", "review PR #X and fix issues", "fix whatever's wrong in this PR", "run the review pipeline".
SKILL.md
6.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Autonomous PR Review & Fix Pipeline
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- You want both review AND automatic fixes in one workflow
- PR has blocking issues that need immediate resolution
- You trust Claude to apply non-controversial fixes (typos, lint errors, obvious bugs)
- You want to minimize back-and-forth between review and implementation
⚠️ Important Notes
This is an autonomous workflow that will:
- Review the PR
- Apply fixes for blocking issues
- Run tests and lint
- Commit changes
- Push to the PR branch
Only use this when:
- You're comfortable with Claude modifying code without asking
- The PR is on a feature branch (not main/develop)
- You can review the resulting diff before merging
Pipeline Steps
Step 1: Fetch and Analyze
-
Get PR information
gh pr view [NUMBER] --json headRefName,baseRefName,title,body -
Fetch the diff (never cached)
gh pr diff [NUMBER] -
Checkout the PR branch
git fetch origin [HEAD_REF] git checkout [HEAD_REF]
Step 2: Categorize Issues
Analyze every file change and categorize issues:
-
[BLOCKING]: Must be fixed before merge
- Bugs and logic errors
- TypeScript errors
- Breaking changes
- Security issues
- Missing error handling
-
[RECOMMENDATION]: Should be fixed but not critical
- Performance improvements
- Better patterns available
- Code style issues
-
[NIT]: Nice-to-have improvements
- Whitespace, formatting
- Comment improvements
- Variable naming
Step 3: Auto-Fix Blocking Issues
For each [BLOCKING] issue:
-
Create a Task sub-agent to implement the fix
Task: Fix [specific issue] Context: [issue description and location] Constraint: Only fix this specific issue, don't refactor -
Wait for sub-agent completion before proceeding to next issue
-
Track fixes with TodoWrite for visibility
Step 4: Run Validation (with Dev Server Protection)
Critical: Verify dev server status BEFORE running tests
# Check if dev server is already running
lsof -ti:3000 || echo "No dev server"
# If dev server needed but not running, start it in background
# If dev server already running, leave it alone
# Run validation suite
npm run lint
npm run type-check
npm run lint:css
npm test
Step 5: Handle Test Failures
If tests fail after fixes:
- Apply 3-attempt limit per test (use test-fix skill principles)
- If test fails after 3 attempts, flag it for human review
- Continue with other tests (don't block entire pipeline)
Step 6: Commit and Push
-
Create a single commit with all fixes
git add -u git commit -m "fix: auto-applied blocking issue fixes from code review - [list of fixes applied] Applied via autonomous PR review pipeline" -
Push to PR branch
git push origin [HEAD_REF]
Step 7: Report Results
Present this summary:
## Autonomous PR Review & Fix Pipeline Results
### Original Review Findings
#### 🔴 Blocking Issues (Auto-Fixed)
[List each blocking issue and how it was fixed]
#### 🔴 Blocking Issues (Flagged for Human Review)
[List issues that couldn't be auto-fixed]
#### 🟡 Recommendations (Not Auto-Fixed)
[List recommendations for user to consider]
#### 🟢 What Looks Good
[Positive observations]
### Fixes Applied
**Commit**: [commit hash]
**Files Modified**: [list of files]
[Detailed list of what was changed]
### Final CI Status
- **Lint**: [PASS/FAIL]
- **Type Check**: [PASS/FAIL]
- **CSS Lint**: [PASS/FAIL]
- **Tests**: [PASS/FAIL - with details on any flagged tests]
### Next Steps
- [ ] Review the auto-applied fixes: `git diff [BASE]..[HEAD]`
- [ ] Address flagged blocking issues (if any)
- [ ] Consider recommendations
- [ ] Merge when ready
Safety Guardrails
Never Auto-Fix
Do NOT automatically fix:
- Architectural decisions
- API contract changes
- Feature behavior changes
- Test expectations (unless test is clearly wrong)
- Anything that changes user-facing behavior
If in doubt, flag for human review instead of auto-fixing.
Dev Server Protection
NEVER:
- Kill or restart the dev server
- Run commands that interfere with running processes
- Assume dev server state
ALWAYS:
- Check if dev server is running before running tests
- Run tests in separate process
- Ask user if you need to start dev server
Commit Safety
Before committing:
- Verify no merge conflict markers
- Verify no debug code introduced
- Verify all auto-fixes are intentional
- Run full lint and test suite
Rollback Instructions
If the pipeline produces bad results:
# Reset to state before pipeline ran
git reset --hard origin/[HEAD_REF]
# Or revert the commit
git revert [COMMIT_HASH]
git push origin [HEAD_REF]
Example Usage
User says: "Auto-review and fix PR #123"
Pipeline:
- Fetches PR #123 diff
- Finds 5 blocking issues: 3 lint errors, 1 TypeScript error, 1 missing await
- Spawns 5 Task agents to fix each issue in parallel
- After fixes, runs lint/test suite
- All tests pass
- Commits: "fix: auto-applied blocking issue fixes from code review"
- Pushes to PR branch
- Reports what was fixed and final status
Total time: 3-5 minutes (vs. 15-30 minutes of back-and-forth)
When NOT to Use This Skill
Don't use this skill if:
- PR changes architectural patterns
- PR has controversial design decisions
- You want to review fixes before they're applied
- You're working on main/develop branch directly
In those cases, do a manual review instead.
Notes
- Uses Task tool for parallel sub-agents (Claude Code's native parallelization)
- Combines review, implementation, and CI checking into one atomic operation