Authentication flow review

Target: $ARGUMENTS

If no target path is given above, review the entire codebase.

---

Authentication Flow Review

Stack note: The code examples and library references below use Node.js/Express conventions (bcrypt, jsonwebtoken, zod/joi, req.body, etc.). If the codebase uses a different language or framework, apply the same security principles and adapt the specifics — for example: bcrypt → passlib/Argon2id (Python), spring-security (Java), bcrypt (Go); jsonwebtoken → PyJWT, java-jwt, golang-jwt/jwt; mongoose.set('sanitizeFilter') → the equivalent ORM sanitization setting. Mark any checklist item Not Applicable if the concept doesn't apply to the detected stack.

Conduct a comprehensive authentication security review:

Check for:

1. Password hashing

   • Uses bcrypt.hash() with salt rounds ≥ 10 (ideally 12); async, not sync; no double-hashing on updates.
   • bcrypt.compare() used for login.

2. JWT secret/key strength & storage

   • Secrets/keys not hardcoded; loaded from env or secret manager; separate keys for access vs refresh.
   • Strong entropy (≥256-bit for HS256) or asymmetric (RS256/ES256) with rotation plan.

3. Token settings

   • Access token TTL 5–15 minutes; refresh token TTL 7–30 days; sliding sessions bounded by a max session age.
   • JWT algorithms, issuer (iss), audience (aud), subject (sub), jti, iat, exp, and optional nbf are enforced in verify.

4. Refresh token implementation

   • Rotation on every use and reuse detection (if old RT is presented, revoke the whole session family).
   • RTs stored in HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite cookie (not localStorage); hashed at rest if persisted; per-device tracking (jti, ua, ip, expiresAt).

5. Session invalidation

   • On password change/reset, previously issued tokens are rejected (compare pwdChangedAt or increment tokenVersion vs jwt.iat).

6. Brute force protection

   • Rate limit login/reset/verify endpoints; progressive backoff per username+IP in a fast store (e.g., Redis); optional CAPTCHA after threshold.

7. Account enumeration defenses

   • Generic errors and identical status/timing for “user not found” vs “bad password”; optional jitter.

8. Password reset flow security

   • Reset tokens via crypto.randomBytes(32), hashed at rest (SHA-256), short TTL (≤ 15–30 min), one-time use, invalidated after success.
   • No secrets in logs; throttle reset email sender.

9. Email verification

   • One-time, short-TTL verification tokens; server-side verified; no way to mark verified via mass-assignment/body fields.

10. SQL/NoSQL injection in auth paths

    • No use of user-controlled operators in filters; query sanitization enabled; no $where; parameterized SQL if applicable.

11. AuthZ integrity

    • Roles/permissions loaded server-side; deny-by-default; never trust role/claims purely from the JWT payload without verification and (for sensitive ops) a DB check.

12. Cookie & CSRF configuration (if cookies used)

    • HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax|Strict, narrow path/domain, explicit Max-Age.
    • CSRF protection on state-changing endpoints and refresh route (double-submit token or same-site strategy).

13. Input validation & normalization

    • Email/username normalization; length & charset checks; password policy; strong schema validation (zod/joi/celebrate).

14. Mass assignment risks

    • Updates whitelist allowed fields; cannot set role, emailVerified, passwordResetToken, etc., from req.body.

15. JWT misuse

    • No jwt.decode() for authorization decisions; always jwt.verify() with explicit algorithms.

16. Logging & telemetry

    • No logging of passwords, tokens, reset links, or PII; structured logs with redaction/allowlist.

17. Dependency & crypto hygiene

    • Maintained jsonwebtoken and bcrypt versions; no custom JWT parser; Node crypto used correctly; no MD5/SHA* for password hashing.

18. Transport & CORS

    • HTTPS enforced; CORS locked to trusted origins; no wildcard credentials; preflight handled safely.

19. Open redirect / next param

    • Post-login redirection restricted to vetted paths/origins; no arbitrary next= redirects.

20. Operational controls

    • Secret rotation procedure; key separation for environments; monitoring for suspicious auth patterns; alerting on RT reuse.

Provide:

• A structured finding report with the following for each issue:

  • Title, Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low), CWE (if applicable), Evidence (file, function, line ranges), and a short Why it matters.
  • Exploitability notes and, where safe, a minimal PoC or reproduction steps (no real secrets).
  • Remediation: precise code-level fix or config change (snippets welcome), plus defense-in-depth guidance.

• A summary risk score (0–10) and top 3–5 prioritized fixes that reduce risk fastest.

• A checklist diff: which items from the “Check for” list are Pass/Fail/Not Applicable.

Constraints & style:

• Be concrete and cite exact code locations and identifiers.
• Prefer minimal, drop-in fix snippets over prose.
• Do not invent files or functions that aren’t present; if context is missing, mark as Unable to verify and say what code would prove it.

Bonus (if applicable):

• Suggest hardening improvements (e.g., switching to RS256 with KMS-managed keys, adding jti blacklist service, adding device/session management UI, enabling mongoose.set('sanitizeFilter', true)).
• Provide quick tests to validate fixes (e.g., RT reuse test, password-changed invalidation test, NoSQLi payload test).

Provide specific vulnerabilities found with severity ratings.

Write this into a markdown file and place it in the audits/ folder.