Openrouter performance tuning
425 plugins, 2,810 skills, 200 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the ccpi CLI package manager.
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill openrouter-performance-tuningAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
'Optimize OpenRouter request latency and throughput. Use when building real-time applications, reducing TTFT, or scaling request volume. Triggers: ''openrouter performance'', ''openrouter latency'', ''openrouter speed'', ''optimize openrouter throughput''.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
9.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
OpenRouter Performance Tuning
Overview
OpenRouter adds minimal overhead (~50-100ms) to direct provider calls. Most latency comes from the upstream model. Key levers: model selection (smaller = faster), streaming (lower TTFT), parallel requests, prompt size reduction, and provider routing to faster infrastructure. This skill covers benchmarking, streaming optimization, concurrent processing, and connection tuning.
Prerequisites
- An OpenRouter API key (
sk-or-v1-...) exported asOPENROUTER_API_KEY— see theopenrouter-install-authskill for setup - Python 3.8+ with the OpenAI SDK (
openaipackage) — the examples use both the syncOpenAIclient andAsyncOpenAIfor parallel processing - Credits on the key if you benchmark paid models like
anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet; a:freemodel is enough to validate the benchmark harness itself HTTP-Referer/X-Titleheader values for your app (set in every client constructor here)
Instructions
- Establish a baseline: run
benchmark_model()from Benchmark Latency against your candidate models (e.g.openai/gpt-4o-minivsanthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet) and record p50/p95. - Check the results against the Model Speed Tiers table to confirm each candidate sits in the right tier for your latency budget (200-500ms TTFT fastest tier; 5-30s for reasoning models).
- Switch user-facing paths to
stream_completion()per Streaming for Lower TTFT and verifyttft_msdrops (typically 2-10x). - Move batch workloads to
parallel_completions()per Parallel Request Processing, capping concurrency withasyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent=5-10). - Apply Connection Optimization — one shared client with
timeout=30.0andmax_retries=2instead of a new client per request. - Work through the Performance Optimization Checklist (set
max_tokens, shrink prompts, consider:nitrovariants and provider routing), then re-run the benchmark to quantify each change.
Benchmark Latency
import os, time, statistics
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
def benchmark_model(model: str, prompt: str = "Say hello", n: int = 5) -> dict:
"""Benchmark a model's latency over N requests."""
latencies = []
for _ in range(n):
start = time.monotonic()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
max_tokens=50,
)
latencies.append((time.monotonic() - start) * 1000)
return {
"model": model,
"p50_ms": round(statistics.median(latencies)),
"p95_ms": round(sorted(latencies)[int(len(latencies) * 0.95)]),
"avg_ms": round(statistics.mean(latencies)),
"min_ms": round(min(latencies)),
"max_ms": round(max(latencies)),
}
# Compare fast vs slow models
for model in ["openai/gpt-4o-mini", "anthropic/claude-3-haiku", "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet"]:
result = benchmark_model(model)
print(f"{result['model']}: p50={result['p50_ms']}ms p95={result['p95_ms']}ms")
Streaming for Lower TTFT
def stream_completion(messages, model="openai/gpt-4o-mini", **kwargs):
"""Stream response for lower time-to-first-token."""
start = time.monotonic()
first_token_time = None
full_content = []
stream = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model, messages=messages, stream=True,
stream_options={"include_usage": True}, # Get token counts at end
**kwargs,
)
for chunk in stream:
if chunk.choices and chunk.choices[0].delta.content:
if first_token_time is None:
first_token_time = (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000
full_content.append(chunk.choices[0].delta.content)
total_time = (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000
return {
"content": "".join(full_content),
"ttft_ms": round(first_token_time or 0),
"total_ms": round(total_time),
}
Parallel Request Processing
import asyncio
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
async def parallel_completions(prompts: list[str], model="openai/gpt-4o-mini",
max_concurrent=10, **kwargs):
"""Process multiple prompts concurrently."""
semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent)
client = AsyncOpenAI(
base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
async def process(prompt):
async with semaphore:
response = await client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
**kwargs,
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
return await asyncio.gather(*[process(p) for p in prompts])
# 10 requests in parallel instead of sequential
results = asyncio.run(parallel_completions(
["Summarize: " + text for text in documents],
max_concurrent=5,
max_tokens=200,
))
Performance Optimization Checklist
| Optimization | Impact | Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Use streaming | TTFT drops 2-10x | Low |
| Use smaller models for simple tasks | 2-5x faster | Low |
| Reduce prompt size | Proportional to reduction | Medium |
Set max_tokens | Caps response time | Low |
| Parallel requests | N requests in ~1 request time | Medium |
Use :nitro variant | Faster inference (where available) | Low |
| Provider routing to fastest | 10-30% latency reduction | Low |
| Connection keep-alive | Saves TCP/TLS handshake | Low |
Model Speed Tiers
| Speed | Models | Typical TTFT |
|---|---|---|
| Fastest | openai/gpt-4o-mini, anthropic/claude-3-haiku | 200-500ms |
| Fast | openai/gpt-4o, google/gemini-2.0-flash-001 | 500ms-1s |
| Standard | anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet | 1-3s |
| Slow | openai/o1, reasoning models | 5-30s |
Connection Optimization
# Reuse client instance (connection pooling)
# BAD: creating new client per request
for prompt in prompts:
c = OpenAI(base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1", ...) # New TCP connection each time
c.chat.completions.create(...)
# GOOD: reuse single client
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
timeout=30.0, # Set appropriate timeout
max_retries=2, # Built-in retry with backoff
default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
for prompt in prompts:
client.chat.completions.create(...) # Reuses HTTP connection
Output
- A latency benchmark table per model from
benchmark_model():p50_ms,p95_ms,avg_ms,min_ms,max_msover N sample requests - Streaming metrics from
stream_completion(): the fullcontentplusttft_msandtotal_msfor each request - A list of completions from
parallel_completions()produced in roughly one request's wall-clock time instead of N sequential round-trips - A prioritized tuning plan drawn from the Performance Optimization Checklist (lever, expected impact, effort)
Examples
Benchmark two fastest-tier candidates before committing to one:
for model in ["openai/gpt-4o-mini", "anthropic/claude-3-haiku"]:
r = benchmark_model(model, n=5)
print(f"{r['model']}: p50={r['p50_ms']}ms p95={r['p95_ms']}ms avg={r['avg_ms']}ms")
# openai/gpt-4o-mini: p50=430ms p95=610ms avg=455ms
# anthropic/claude-3-haiku: p50=395ms p95=580ms avg=418ms
Both land in the fastest tier (200-500ms typical TTFT), so choose on cost or quality — then stream_completion() cuts perceived latency further for user-facing paths. More worked examples: references/examples.md.
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| High TTFT (>5s) | Model cold-starting or overloaded | Switch to :nitro variant or different provider |
| Timeout errors | max_tokens too high or model too slow | Reduce max_tokens; use streaming; increase timeout |
| Throughput bottleneck | Sequential processing | Use async + semaphore for concurrent requests |
| Inconsistent latency | Provider load varies | Use provider.order to pin to fastest provider |
Enterprise Considerations
- Benchmark models in your infrastructure, not just locally -- network path matters
- Use streaming for all user-facing requests to minimize perceived latency
- Set
max_tokenson every request to bound response time and cost - Reuse client instances to benefit from HTTP connection pooling
- Use
asyncio.Semaphoreto control concurrency and avoid overwhelming the API - Monitor P95 latency, not just average -- tail latencies indicate provider issues
- Consider
:nitromodel variants for latency-critical paths
References
- Examples | Errors
- Models API | Streaming