Notion policy guardrails
425 plugins, 2,810 skills, 200 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the ccpi CLI package manager.
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill notion-policy-guardrailsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when you need to govern Notion integrations at scale — set integration naming standards, enforce page sharing policies, standardize property naming and database schemas, and run access audits that scan which bots can reach which pages. Trigger with phrases like "notion governance", "notion policy", "notion naming convention", "notion access audit", "notion schema standard".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Notion Policy & Guardrails
Overview
Governance framework for Notion integrations at scale. Covers integration
naming standards, page sharing policy enforcement, property naming conventions,
database schema validation, and access audit scripts. Uses Client from
@notionhq/client for programmatic enforcement.
Prerequisites
@notionhq/clientv2.x installed (npm install @notionhq/client)- Python:
notion-clientinstalled (pip install notion-client) NOTION_TOKENenvironment variable set (admin-level integration recommended for audits)- CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions examples provided)
Authentication
All scripts authenticate with a Notion internal integration token read from
the NOTION_TOKEN environment variable — never hardcode it. Create the token at
notion.so/my-integrations, share the target pages/databases with the integration,
and inject the token via CI secrets (e.g. secrets.NOTION_AUDIT_TOKEN). Audit
scripts want a broadly-shared admin integration; runtime bots want the narrowest
sharing scope that works. Token rotation is tracked in Step 1 (max 90 days).
Instructions
The workflow has three stages. Each stage's full enforcement code (TypeScript + Python) lives in references/implementation.md — the skeletons below show the shape; drill into the reference for the complete functions.
Step 1: Integration Naming Standards and Token Management
Establish a {team}-{env}-{purpose} naming convention (e.g. eng-prod-sync) so
teams can identify which bot accessed what, validate it at startup, and track
token rotation (max 90 days). Core check:
// Must match: /^[a-z]+-[a-z]+-[a-z]+$/ → eng-prod-sync
function validateIntegrationName(name: string): string[] { /* ... */ }
Full IntegrationConfig, startup validation, and checkTokenExpiry registry:
references/implementation.md § Step 1.
Step 2: Page Sharing Policies and Property Naming Conventions
Standardize property names across databases (PascalCase titles, Date/At
suffixes on dates, plural multi-selects, a banned-name list) and audit which
pages are shared publicly. Core check:
async function auditDatabaseSchema(notion, databaseId):
Promise<{ violations: string[]; recommendations: string[] }> { /* ... */ }
Full PROPERTY_NAMING_RULES, auditPageAccess, and the Python port:
references/implementation.md § Step 2.
Step 3: Access Audit Scripts and Database Schema Standards
Run a paginated, rate-limited workspace audit of everything the integration can reach, and gate schema drift in CI. Core check:
async function workspaceAccessAudit(notion: Client): Promise<void> { /* ... */ }
// Flags integrations with access to >1000 items; enumerates every database.
Full validateSchemaInCI, the GitHub Actions workflow (weekly cron + token
scan), and the Python port: references/implementation.md § Step 3.
Output
- Integration naming standards validated at startup
- Token rotation tracking with expiry warnings
- Property naming conventions audited against database schemas
- Access audit showing all content visible to the integration
- CI workflow enforcing schema standards and secret scanning
- Violation report with actionable recommendations
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Audit shows too many pages | Integration shared at workspace level | Narrow sharing to specific pages/databases |
| Schema validation fails | Property renamed in Notion UI | Update schema config to match |
| Token scan false positive | Test fixtures contain example tokens | Add --exclude for test directories |
object_not_found during audit | Page unshared since last audit | Expected — log and continue |
| Naming convention too strict | Legacy integrations don't match | Add exceptions list with migration deadline |
Examples
A one-line CI secret scan and the .env-not-committed guard:
grep -rn "ntn_\|secret_" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/ && echo "FAIL: Token found" || echo "PASS: No tokens"
git ls-files | grep -E "^\.env" && echo "FAIL: .env committed" || echo "PASS"
For the full SCHEMA_REGISTRY (per-database required-property maps that feed
CI validation) and more, see references/examples.md.
Resources
- Notion Integration Best Practices
- Notion Authorization Guide
- ESLint Custom Rules
- Pre-commit Framework
Next Steps
For architecture blueprints, see notion-architecture-variants.
For common mistakes to avoid, see notion-known-pitfalls.