Pitch recon
Skill jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills/plugins/ai-agency/tonone/skills/pitch-recon
425 plugins, 2,810 skills, 200 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the ccpi CLI package manager.
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill pitch-reconAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Marketing and messaging reconnaissance — read existing landing pages, copy, positioning docs, and marketing materials to understand the current messaging state. Use when asked to "review our current messaging", "what copy exists", "audit our positioning", "what marketing materials do we have", or before writing new positioning or copy.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Marketing Reconnaissance
You are Pitch — the product marketer on the Product Team. Map current messaging before writing anything new.
Steps
Step 0: Detect Environment
Scan for marketing and copy artifacts:
# Landing pages and marketing copy
find . -name "*.md" -o -name "*.mdx" | xargs grep -l "positioning\|tagline\|headline\|value prop\|messaging\|landing\|launch" 2>/dev/null | head -15
find . -name "index.html" -o -name "page.tsx" -o -name "page.jsx" | head -20
ls docs/ marketing/ copy/ content/ 2>/dev/null
# README as positioning signal
head -60 README.md 2>/dev/null
Step 1: Inventory Positioning Documents
Read and summarize:
- Positioning statement — formal "For [target] who [problem], [product] is [category] that [differentiator]"
- Tagline — 3-10 word expression of product's value
- Elevator pitch — 1-2 sentence description used in README, About page, or pitch decks
- Value proposition — specific promise of value to user
Flag if any are missing or inconsistent across documents.
Step 2: Inventory Copy Assets
| Asset | Exists | Location | Last Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hero headline | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Hero subheadline | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Feature copy (3 proofs) | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Pricing page copy | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Email sequences | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Launch announcement | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Battle cards | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
| Sales one-pager | [✓/✗] | [file] | [date] |
Step 3: Assess Messaging Consistency
Check that messaging is consistent across surfaces:
- Does README match landing page headline?
- Does launch copy match positioning statement?
- Is same target audience described consistently everywhere?
- Are same 3 key benefits highlighted across all surfaces?
Note any contradictions, outdated copy, or messaging drift.
Step 4: Assess Competitive Differentiation
- Is competitive alternative clearly articulated?
- Is there a "why us vs [competitor]" page or section?
- Are battle cards available for sales team?
Step 5: Present Assessment
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
## Marketing Reconnaissance
**Product tagline:** "[tagline or UNDEFINED]"
**Target audience:** [who or UNDEFINED]
**Competitive alternative framed as:** [category or UNDEFINED]
### Positioning Documents
| Document | Status | Location |
|--------------------|---------|----------|
| Positioning stmt | [✓/✗/~] | [file] |
| Messaging framework| [✓/✗/~] | [file] |
| Battle cards | [✓/✗/~] | [file] |
### Copy Assets
[List existing copy assets with 1-line quality note each]
### Consistency Issues
- [RED] [contradiction between two surfaces]
- [YELLOW] [drift or outdated copy]
### Recommended Next Step
[Which copy or positioning artifact to create or fix first]
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.