Deploy
Skill jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills/plugins/ai-agency/hyperflow/skills/deploy
425 plugins, 2,810 skills, 200 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the ccpi CLI package manager.
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill deployAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when ready to ship — runs pre-push gates (lint, typecheck, build, tests, security sweep), commits, releases, and pushes. Standalone, never auto-invoked. Push always requires explicit confirmation. Trigger with /hyperflow:deploy, "ship it", "ready to push", "release", "cut a release", "deploy".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
19.8 KB, ~4.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Deploy
No gate skipped, no failure ignored. If any gate fails, halt and report. Never --no-verify. Never bypass.
Failure recovery (rule 14). Worker errors and Quality Gate failures follow the canonical policy in skills/hyperflow/failure-recovery.md. Gate failures are user-surfaced, never auto-fixed — print the failing command + full stderr and halt the push. Never --no-verify, never force-push to main.
Per-Step Agent Map
| Step | Sub-phase | Workers | Reviewer | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | Repo-state scan | Worker A (git status), Worker B (git log) | Reviewer | — |
| 1b | Tool detection | Worker A (profile.md + lockfiles), Worker B (testing.md + devDeps) | Reviewer | — |
| 2a | Lint + typecheck (parallel) | Worker A (linter), Worker B (formatter), Worker C (tsc) | Reviewer | Step 3 (Security Sweep) runs in parallel with Step 2 at orchestrator level; 2a halts chain on any failure before 2b |
| 2b | Build gate | Worker A (prod build), Worker B (dev build) | Reviewer | Depends on 2a PASS |
| 2c | Test gate | Worker A (unit), Worker B (integration/E2E) | Reviewer | Parallel (P1); depends on 2b PASS |
| 3a | Secrets scan | Worker A (diff pattern), Worker B (file pattern) | security-reviewer | Runs in parallel with Step 2 (pre-build; read-only) |
| 3b | Dependency audit | Worker A (CVE audit), Worker B (license check) | vulnerability-reviewer (web-research-first) | — |
| 4 | Commit | single Worker | Reviewer | atomic-exempt (DOCTRINE 12.2) |
| 5a | Release execution | single Worker | Reviewer | atomic-exempt (DOCTRINE 12.2) |
| 5b | Version sync | Worker A (manifests), Worker B (changelog) | Reviewer | — |
| 6 | Push gate | AskUserQuestion | — | structural gate; atomic-exempt |
| 7 | Output | single print | — | atomic-exempt (§12.1) |
Step 1 — Survey State
Sub-phases run in parallel (P1).
Step 1a — Repo-state scan
Two Workers in parallel:
- Worker A —
git status --short— uncommitted changes, staged files - Worker B —
git log origin/<branch>..HEAD --oneline— commits ahead of remote; detect branch name
Reviewer — verdict on repo state (clean / has uncommitted / ahead by N). If detached HEAD or no remote configured → halt with reason.
Step 1b — Tool detection
Two Workers in parallel:
- Worker A — Read
.hyperflow/profile.mdfor package manager and project type; fallback: inspectpackage.json,pyproject.toml,Cargo.toml,go.mod - Worker B — Check
.hyperflow/testing.mdfor test runner; fallback: detect frompackage.jsondevDependencies (vitest,jest,playwright,pytest, etc.)
Reviewer — produce a single tool manifest (package manager, test runner, typed-project flag, build script presence). Used by Step 2 gates.
Step 2 — Quality Gates
Step 2 runs in parallel with Step 3 (Security Sweep) at the orchestrator level — both are pre-build, read-only checks. Both must reach PASS before Step 4 (Commit) may proceed. Within Step 2, sub-phases 2a → 2b → 2c run sequentially (2b depends on 2a PASS; 2c depends on 2b PASS). Halt at the first NEEDS_REVISION verdict.
Wall-clock note: default flow runs 3 gates simultaneously (lint + security + typecheck in parallel), then build, then tests — roughly max(lint, security, typecheck) + build + max(unit, integration), versus the old 4× sequential gate duration. Typical saving: ~40% wall-clock reduction. Under --thorough, a standalone final-integration review pass is added after all gates complete, and intra-sub-phase Workers serialize (DOCTRINE §12.2/clarification), so the full saving collapses to 2c's unit + integration pair only.
Print Gate <letter> — <name> before each sub-phase.
Step 2a — Lint + typecheck (parallel; no build artifact required)
Three Workers in parallel (P1). None depend on build output — safe to run alongside Step 3.
- Worker A — Detect and run primary linter:
npm run lint/pnpm lint/bun run lint/eslint .. On failure: auto-fix via--fix, re-run once; report final error count. - Worker B — Detect and run formatter check:
prettier --check ./biome check ./ equivalent. Report diff count. - Worker C — Root typecheck:
tsc --noEmit/npm run typecheck. Skip if not a typed project (per Step 1b tool manifest). Also run per-package typecheck if workspace detected (pnpm/yarn workspaces): iterate packages withtsc --noEmitin each.
Reviewer — aggregate verdict across all three Workers:
PASS— all clean (or absent/untyped)NEEDS_REVISION— any gate fails → halt before 2b. Report which specific gate(s) failed and why. Do NOT proceed to build.ESCALATE— config errors preventing execution of any gate
Step 2b — Build gate (sequential; depends on 2a PASS)
Two Workers in parallel:
- Worker A — Production build:
npm run build/pnpm build/bun run build. Capture output; report size or artifact path if printed. - Worker B — Dev/preview build if a separate script exists (
npm run build:dev,vite build --mode development, etc.). Skip if no separate dev-build script.
Reviewer — verdict:
PASS— production build succeedsNEEDS_REVISION— production build fails → halt with outputESCALATE— build tool absent or script missing (skip silently, not failure)
Step 2c — Test gate (parallel; depends on 2b PASS)
Two Workers in parallel (P1):
- Worker A — Unit tests: run full unit suite per runner from Step 1b (vitest, jest, pytest, cargo test, etc.). Full suite — not just affected. Report count.
- Worker B — Integration / E2E tests if runner detected separately (playwright, cypress, etc.). Skip if no integration runner found.
Reviewer — verdict:
PASS— all tests pass (or integration absent)NEEDS_REVISION— failing tests → halt with failing test names. Do NOT skip. Do NOT increase timeout.ESCALATE— runner misconfigured or no tests found and test runner is declared
See quality-gates.md for gate details.
Step 3 — Security Sweep
Runs in parallel with Step 2 at the orchestrator level (P3 — concurrent independent pre-conditions; DOCTRINE §12.2). Both Step 2 and Step 3 are pre-build, read-only checks with no shared state. Both must reach PASS before Step 4 (Commit) may proceed. Halt on SECURITY_VIOLATION immediately — no retry, no 2a must also complete first.
Sub-phases 3a and 3b run in parallel (P1).
Step 3a — Secrets and keys scan
Two Workers in parallel:
- Worker A — Pattern scan staged + recent diff for hardcoded secrets: API keys, private keys, connection strings, tokens. Use
git diff HEAD~1..HEADas scan surface. - Worker B — File-level scan of files modified in this changeset for common secret patterns (SG., sk-, ghp_, AKIA, BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY, etc.).
Reviewer — dispatched as the security-reviewer specialist — aggregate findings from 3a Workers. If any secret found → halt immediately with SECURITY_VIOLATION: <file>:<line> — <pattern>. No auto-remediation — user must rotate + remove. (Add compliance-reviewer when the changeset touches PII / regulated data.)
Step 3b — Dependency audit
Two Workers in parallel:
- Worker A —
npm audit --audit-level=high/pnpm audit/pip-audit/cargo audit. Report critical and high CVEs only. - Worker B — License check: scan new dependencies added in this changeset for prohibited licenses (GPL in a proprietary project, etc.) if
.hyperflow/profile.mddeclares a license policy.
Reviewer — dispatched as the vulnerability-reviewer specialist (deploy is a gated flow → web-research-first on current advisories, proving each CVE's applicability to the pinned versions) — verdict:
PASS— no critical/high CVEs; no license violationsNEEDS_REVISION— critical CVE found → halt and surface CVE IDsESCALATE— audit tool absent → skip silently (not a failure); missing license policy → skip
Step 4 — Commit
Atomic — single Worker → Reviewer pair with no parallel angles. Exempt from sub-phase decomposition per DOCTRINE 12.2 atomic exemption.
-
Worker-introduced fixes from Step 2 → commit automatically with a conventional commit message.
-
Pre-existing user-owned uncommitted changes → use
AskUserQuestionto confirm inclusion. Per DOCTRINE rule 8, this is a binary action gate — no recommendation marker:Include uncommitted user changes in this commit? Include — your local work + the pre-push fixes ship together Exclude — commit only the worker fixes; user changes stay localIf the popup UI is unavailable on a portable surface (Codex / OpenCode / Grok), print the same inclusion gate as a
Hyperflow Questionchat block and wait for the user's answer. -
Never add
Co-Authored-By: Claudein commit messages — see git-workflow.md.
Step 5 — Release
Sub-phases run sequentially (5b depends on 5a output).
Step 5a — Release script execution
Single Worker (no parallel angle — single mechanical action):
- Worker —
scripts/release.shexists → run it.release-please/changesetsdetected → use it. "Nothing to release" or no releasable commits → skip and recordRelease: skipped.
Reviewer — capture output: new version string (if bumped) or skip reason. Feed version to Step 5b.
Step 5b — Version sync verification
Two Workers in parallel (only runs if 5a produced a new version):
- Worker A — Verify version appears consistently across all manifests:
package.json,plugin.json,marketplace.json, any other version-bearing files identified in Step 1b. - Worker B — Verify CHANGELOG was updated by the release script: check that the new version header exists in
CHANGELOG.md(or equivalent). Skip if no changelog file.
Reviewer — verdict:
PASS— all manifests in sync; changelog updatedNEEDS_REVISION— version mismatch or changelog missing entry → halt- (Skip entirely if Step 5a returned
Release: skipped)
Step 6 — Push (honors push pre-election from Scope Step 2.6 · STRUCTURAL GATE when push=ask)
Read the push arg from chain args (propagated from Scope Step 2.6 when chain-mode=auto). Three paths:
push=auto — push immediately without asking. Print Push: pre-elected (auto) — pushing branch + tags…. Run git push, then git push --tags if release created tags. Skip the AskUserQuestion call. Per DOCTRINE rule 8, this is NOT an invented skip — the user already gave consent at Scope Step 2.6.
push=never — skip the push step entirely. Print Push: pre-elected (never) — branch held local. Run \git push` manually when ready.Do not callgit push`.
push=ask (default; also fires when no operational pre-election was made — e.g. deploy invoked standalone) — fire the structural-gate AskUserQuestion. Per DOCTRINE rule 8, this is a binary action gate — no recommendation marker on either option.
Push to origin/<branch>?
Push — all gates pass · safe to ship
Hold — keep local; you can push later
- Never force-push to main or master, regardless of
pushvalue.push=autois a plaingit push; if the remote rejects it (non-fast-forward), surface the error and stop — do NOT add--force. - On yes (or
push=auto) —git push, thengit push --tagsif release created tags. - If the popup UI is unavailable on a portable surface (Codex / OpenCode / Grok) for
push=ask, print the push gate as aHyperflow Questionchat block and wait for the user's answer. If no interactive channel is available at all, hold the push and printPush: held — interactive confirmation required.
Step 7 — Output
── Ship Result ───────────────────
Branch: <name>
Gates: lint pass · typecheck pass · build pass · tests pass (<n> passed)
Security: pass
Commit: <sha> <message>
Release: v<x.y.z> (or skipped)
Push: confirmed (or held)
──────────────────────────────────
On gate failure:
── Ship Result ───────────────────
Branch: <name>
Gates: lint pass · typecheck fail · build skipped · tests skipped
typecheck: 3 errors in src/auth/middleware.ts
Halted at Step 2a
──────────────────────────────────
Use pass / fail / skipped as plain words — no ✓ / ✗ / — symbols.
Anti-patterns
--no-verify,--no-gpg-sign, bypassing hooks- Ignoring failing tests
- Force-pushing to main
- Auto-pushing without explicit confirmation
- Committing
Co-Authored-By: Claude
Memory
After successful ship, append to .hyperflow/memory/patterns.md if any new pattern was confirmed during gates. Skip if nothing new.
Doctrine
Full rules in DOCTRINE.md. Output style in output-style.md.
Overview
/hyperflow:deploy runs the pre-push gates (lint + typecheck + security sweep in parallel, then build, then tests), composes any worker-introduced fixes into a clean commit, runs the release script if present, and asks before pushing. Standalone — never auto-invoked from the chain. Push always requires an explicit AskUserQuestion confirmation. Never bypasses hooks, never force-pushes to main, never adds AI attribution to commits.
Prerequisites
- Git repository with a remote configured (for the push step).
- Lint / typecheck / build / test scripts detectable in
package.jsonor via.hyperflow/testing.md. Missing scripts are skipped silently (not failed). scripts/release.sh(orrelease-please/changesets) optional — if present, runs at Step 5; otherwise release is user-managed.- For security sweep: the security-reviewer and vulnerability-reviewer specialist agents are dispatched. Sweep is mandatory; failure to dispatch = halt.
Instructions
The 7 numbered steps live in Step 1 — Survey State through Step 7 — Output above. Summary:
- Survey state — two sub-phases in parallel: 1a repo-state scan (git status + ahead count), 1b tool detection (package manager, test runner, typed-project flag).
- Quality gates — three sequential sub-phases: 2a lint+typecheck (3-wide parallel Workers, no build artifact needed), 2b build (depends on 2a PASS), 2c tests (2-wide parallel, depends on 2b PASS). Runs in parallel with Step 3 at orchestrator level. Halt at first
NEEDS_REVISION. - Security sweep — runs in parallel with Step 2 (P3, pre-build read-only). Two sub-phases in parallel: 3a secrets/keys scan (security-reviewer specialist), 3b dependency audit. Halt on
SECURITY_VIOLATIONor critical CVE. Both Step 2 and Step 3 must PASS before Step 4. - Commit — atomic. Worker fixes auto-committed;
AskUserQuestionfor pre-existing uncommitted user changes. - Release — two sequential sub-phases: 5a run release script, 5b verify version sync across manifests.
- Push gate — atomic structural gate. Honors
pushpre-election (auto/never/ask).push=askfiresAskUserQuestion. Never force-push to main. - Print structured ship result.
Output
See the ship result block in Step 7 — Output above. Two formats: success (all gates pass, listed inline) and failure (halt at first failing gate, listed in order). Always uses plain words (pass / fail / skipped) — no decorative symbols.
Error Handling
| Failure | Behavior |
|---|---|
| Step 2a — lint fails | Auto-retry once with --fix. Still failing → halt with error count. Do NOT proceed to 2b. |
| Step 2a — typecheck fails | Halt at 2a. No auto-fix — typecheck errors require human eyes. |
| Step 2b — build fails | Halt with build output. Pre-existing build issues likely pre-date the change set. |
| Step 2c — tests fail | Halt with failing test names. Do NOT skip failing tests. Do NOT increase timeout. |
| Security sweep finds secrets | Halt with SECURITY_VIOLATION: marker and the file:line. User decides remediation (revert the secret + rotate the credential). |
scripts/release.sh says "nothing to release" | Skip release; print Release: skipped (nothing to release). Push step still fires for non-release commits. |
| Push rejected (non-fast-forward) | Refuse to force-push. Print: Push rejected — branch is behind origin. Pull/rebase first. |
AskUserQuestion popup unavailable (Codex / OpenCode / Grok) | Print the push or commit-inclusion gate as a Hyperflow Question chat block and wait for the user's answer. |
| Headless / non-interactive | Refuse push step entirely. Print structured result with Push: held — interactive confirmation required. |
| Pre-existing uncommitted user changes | Use AskUserQuestion to ask whether to include or exclude from the commit. Default: include. |
Examples
Clean release path
/hyperflow:deploy
Step 2a — Lint + typecheck (parallel with Step 3 security sweep)
Worker A — running lint
Worker B — running formatter check
Worker C — running tsc
Step 3a/3b — security sweep (parallel)
Step 2a Reviewer — all clean
Step 3 Reviewer — no secrets found
Step 2b — Build
Step 2c — Tests (parallel)
? Push to origin/main?
Push — all gates pass · safe to ship
Hold — keep local; you can push later
[user picks Push]
── Ship Result ───────────────────
Branch: main
Gates: lint pass · typecheck pass · build pass · tests pass (147 passed)
Security: pass
Commit: dc38564 fix(skills): marketplace validator compliance
Release: v3.1.2
Push: confirmed
──────────────────────────────────
Gate failure halts the pipeline
/hyperflow:deploy
Step 2a — Lint + typecheck (parallel with Step 3 security sweep)
Worker A — running lint
Lint failed: 3 errors in src/auth/middleware.ts
Auto-fix attempted... still failing.
Step 2a Reviewer — NEEDS_REVISION: lint gate failed (3 errors in src/auth/middleware.ts)
Halted at Step 2a. Build and tests skipped.
── Ship Result ───────────────────
Branch: main
Gates: lint fail · typecheck skipped · build skipped · tests skipped
lint: 3 errors in src/auth/middleware.ts (unused vars, missing return type)
Halted at Step 2a
──────────────────────────────────
Security violation
/hyperflow:deploy
Gates pass: lint · typecheck · build · tests
**Reviewer** — security sweep
SECURITY_VIOLATION: src/config/email.ts:12 — hardcoded SendGrid API key (SG.xxx...)
Halted before commit. Rotate the credential and remove the literal from source before retrying.
Resources
- DOCTRINE.md — orchestration rules (especially #8 push confirmation gate).
- quality-gates.md — full lint/typecheck/build/test policy.
- security.md — security sweep policy and blocklists.
- git-workflow.md — branch/commit conventions, no AI attribution rule.
- output-style.md — ship result formatting.