Openrouter reference architecture
Skill jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills/skills/.curated/openrouter-reference-architecture
425 plugins, 2,810 skills, 200 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the ccpi CLI package manager.
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill openrouter-reference-architectureAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
'Design production architectures using OpenRouter as the LLM gateway. Use when planning system design, reviewing architecture, or scaling AI applications. Triggers: ''openrouter architecture'', ''openrouter system design'', ''openrouter at scale'', ''llm gateway architecture''.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
12.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
OpenRouter Reference Architecture
Overview
OpenRouter serves as a unified LLM gateway, abstracting provider complexity. A production architecture wraps it with caching, rate limiting, cost controls, observability, and async processing. This skill provides three reference architectures: simple (single service), standard (microservice), and enterprise (event-driven).
Prerequisites
- An OpenRouter API key (
sk-or-v1-...) exported asOPENROUTER_API_KEY— see theopenrouter-install-authskill for setup - Python 3.8+ with the OpenAI SDK; FastAPI + Pydantic for Architecture 2's AI service, and a Redis instance (with the
redispackage) for Architecture 2's cache and Architecture 3's queue/results store - SQLite or Postgres if you implement Architecture 2's budget enforcer
- Your scale numbers — team size, requests/day, and latency needs drive the decision in Choosing an Architecture
Instructions
- Score your system against the Choosing an Architecture table: team size, requests/day, latency needs, budget-tracking granularity, failure handling, observability.
- Start with Architecture 1 (Simple): one shared client (
max_retries=3,timeout=30.0) behind the loggingcomplete()wrapper. - When you need task routing, caching, and per-user budgets, move to Architecture 2 (Standard): a FastAPI
/v1/completeendpoint with theROUTING_TABLE, cache-first lookup, budget check, and a fallback chain (models+route: "fallback"). - At 100K+ requests/day or mixed sync/async workloads, adopt Architecture 3 (Enterprise): queue (Redis/SQS) → auto-scaling workers running
worker_loop()→ results store, with OTEL metrics feeding dashboards and alerts. - Whichever tier you land on, route every call through the same OpenRouter client wrapper per Enterprise Considerations — consistent logging, cost tracking, and no budget bypass.
Architecture 1: Simple (Single Service)
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Your App │────▶│ OpenRouter Client │────▶│ OpenRouter │
│ │ │ - Retry (SDK built-in) │ │ /api/v1 │
│ │◀────│ - Cost tracking │◀────│ │
│ │ │ - Structured logging │ └──────────────┘
└─────────────┘ └──────────────────────────┘
import os, logging
from openai import OpenAI
log = logging.getLogger("llm")
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
max_retries=3,
timeout=30.0,
default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
def complete(prompt, model="openai/gpt-4o-mini", **kwargs):
kwargs.setdefault("max_tokens", 1024)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
**kwargs,
)
log.info(f"[{response.model}] {response.usage.prompt_tokens}+{response.usage.completion_tokens} tokens")
return response.choices[0].message.content
Architecture 2: Standard (Microservice)
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ API Gateway│────▶│ AI Service │────▶│ OpenRouter │
│ (auth, │ │ ┌─────────────┐ │ │ /api/v1 │
│ rate-limit│ │ │ Router │ │ └──────────────┘
│ logging) │ │ │ (task→model)│ │
└─────────────┘ │ └─────────────┘ │
│ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Cache │◀──▶│── Redis
│ │ (TTL-based) │ │
│ └─────────────┘ │
│ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Budget │◀──▶│── SQLite/Postgres
│ │ Enforcer │ │
│ └─────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────┘
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends, HTTPException
from pydantic import BaseModel
app = FastAPI()
class CompletionRequest(BaseModel):
prompt: str
task_type: str = "general" # classification, code, analysis, etc.
max_tokens: int = 1024
user_id: str = "anonymous"
ROUTING_TABLE = {
"classification": "openai/gpt-4o-mini",
"code": "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
"analysis": "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
"general": "openai/gpt-4o-mini",
"budget": "meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct",
}
@app.post("/v1/complete")
async def complete(req: CompletionRequest):
model = ROUTING_TABLE.get(req.task_type, "openai/gpt-4o-mini")
# Check cache first (for deterministic requests)
cached = cache.get(model, req.prompt)
if cached:
return {"content": cached, "cached": True}
# Check budget
budget.check(req.user_id, model, estimate_tokens(req.prompt), req.max_tokens)
# Call OpenRouter
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": req.prompt}],
max_tokens=req.max_tokens,
extra_body={
"models": [model, "openai/gpt-4o-mini"], # Fallback
"route": "fallback",
},
)
# Record cost and cache
budget.record(req.user_id, response.id)
cache.set(model, req.prompt, response.choices[0].message.content)
return {
"content": response.choices[0].message.content,
"model": response.model,
"tokens": response.usage.prompt_tokens + response.usage.completion_tokens,
}
Architecture 3: Enterprise (Event-Driven)
┌──────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ API │───▶│ Queue │───▶│ Workers │───▶│ OpenRouter │
│ Gateway │ │ (Redis/ │ │ (auto-scale) │ │ /api/v1 │
└──────────┘ │ SQS) │ │ ┌──────────┐│ └──────────────┘
└───────────┘ │ │ Router ││
│ │ │ Cache ││
▼ │ │ Budget ││
┌───────────┐ │ │ Audit ││
│ Results │◀───│ └──────────┘│
│ Store │ └──────────────┘
└───────────┘
│
┌───────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Metrics │───▶│ Dashboard │
│ (OTEL) │ │ Alerts │
└───────────┘ └──────────────┘
# Worker that processes queued AI requests
import json, redis
r = redis.Redis()
def worker_loop():
"""Process AI requests from the queue."""
while True:
_, raw = r.brpop("ai:requests")
request = json.loads(raw)
try:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=request["model"],
messages=request["messages"],
max_tokens=request.get("max_tokens", 1024),
extra_body={
"models": [request["model"], "openai/gpt-4o-mini"],
"route": "fallback",
},
)
result = {
"id": request["id"],
"content": response.choices[0].message.content,
"model": response.model,
"status": "complete",
}
except Exception as e:
result = {"id": request["id"], "error": str(e), "status": "failed"}
r.lpush(f"ai:results:{request['id']}", json.dumps(result))
r.expire(f"ai:results:{request['id']}", 3600)
Choosing an Architecture
| Factor | Simple | Standard | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team size | 1-3 | 3-10 | 10+ |
| Requests/day | <1K | 1K-100K | 100K+ |
| Latency needs | Tolerant | Low | Mixed (sync+async) |
| Budget tracking | Basic | Per-user | Per-user + department |
| Failure handling | SDK retries | Fallback chain | Queue + retry + DLQ |
| Observability | Logging | Metrics + logging | Full OTEL tracing |
Output
- An architecture selection (Simple / Standard / Enterprise) justified line-by-line against the Choosing an Architecture criteria
- Architecture 1: a logging
complete()wrapper that records the serving model and prompt+completion token counts on every call - Architecture 2: a
/v1/completeFastAPI endpoint returning{content, model, tokens}— or{content, cached: true}on a cache hit — with task-type routing and budget enforcement applied - Architecture 3: worker-produced result records
{id, content, model, status}pushed toai:results:{id}with a one-hour TTL
Examples
Route a code task through the Architecture 2 microservice:
# POST /v1/complete (Architecture 2)
req = CompletionRequest(prompt="Refactor this function...", task_type="code", user_id="u42")
# ROUTING_TABLE maps "code" -> anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet, with openai/gpt-4o-mini as fallback
# -> {"content": "...", "model": "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet", "tokens": 348}
Repeating the identical request returns {"content": "...", "cached": true} straight from the TTL cache without touching OpenRouter or the budget. More worked examples: references/examples.md.
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Single point of failure | No redundancy in AI service | Deploy 2+ instances behind load balancer |
| Queue backlog | Worker throughput < incoming rate | Auto-scale workers; implement backpressure |
| Cache stampede | Many requests for same uncached key | Use cache locking or singleflight pattern |
| Budget bypass | Direct calls skipping middleware | All calls must go through the AI service |
Enterprise Considerations
- Start with Architecture 1 and evolve to 2/3 as scale demands
- Use the queue-based pattern for any request that can tolerate >1s latency (cost reports, batch processing)
- OpenTelemetry traces should span from API gateway through AI service to OpenRouter
- Implement dead letter queues (DLQ) for failed requests that exhaust all retries
- Run separate worker pools for different priority levels (real-time vs batch)
- All architectures should share the same OpenRouter client wrapper for consistent logging and cost tracking
References
- Examples | Errors
- API Reference | Model Routing