Figma load scale
Skill jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills/skills/.curated/figma-load-scale
425 plugins, 2,810 skills, 200 agents for Claude Code. Open-source marketplace at tonsofskills.com with the ccpi CLI package manager.
npx -y skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill figma-load-scaleAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
'Load test Figma API integrations and plan for scale.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Figma Load & Scale
Overview
Test and plan for the throughput limits of your Figma API integration. Figma's rate limits use a leaky bucket algorithm -- this skill helps you find the bucket size for your plan tier and design your integration to stay within it.
Prerequisites
- k6 load testing tool (
brew install k6orapt install k6) - Figma test PAT (do not load test with production token)
- A test Figma file (not your production design system)
Instructions
Step 1: k6 Load Test Script
// figma-load-test.js
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';
import { Rate, Trend } from 'k6/metrics';
const figmaErrors = new Rate('figma_errors');
const figmaLatency = new Trend('figma_latency', true);
export const options = {
scenarios: {
// Test 1: Find your rate limit ceiling
rate_limit_probe: {
executor: 'constant-arrival-rate',
rate: 10, // 10 requests per second
timeUnit: '1s',
duration: '2m',
preAllocatedVUs: 5,
maxVUs: 20,
},
},
thresholds: {
figma_errors: ['rate<0.10'], // Less than 10% errors
figma_latency: ['p(95)<3000'], // P95 under 3 seconds
http_req_duration: ['p(99)<5000'], // P99 under 5 seconds
},
};
const PAT = __ENV.FIGMA_PAT;
const FILE_KEY = __ENV.FIGMA_FILE_KEY;
export default function () {
// Use a lightweight endpoint for rate limit testing
const res = http.get(
`https://api.figma.com/v1/files/${FILE_KEY}?depth=1`,
{
headers: { 'X-Figma-Token': PAT },
tags: { endpoint: 'files' },
}
);
figmaLatency.add(res.timings.duration);
const isError = res.status !== 200;
figmaErrors.add(isError);
check(res, {
'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
'not rate limited': (r) => r.status !== 429,
'latency < 2s': (r) => r.timings.duration < 2000,
});
if (res.status === 429) {
const retryAfter = parseInt(res.headers['Retry-After'] || '60');
console.log(`Rate limited. Retry-After: ${retryAfter}s`);
sleep(retryAfter);
} else {
sleep(0.1); // 100ms between requests
}
}
Step 2: Run Load Tests
# Probe rate limits
k6 run \
--env FIGMA_PAT="${FIGMA_PAT}" \
--env FIGMA_FILE_KEY="${FIGMA_FILE_KEY}" \
figma-load-test.js
# Export results to JSON for analysis
k6 run \
--env FIGMA_PAT="${FIGMA_PAT}" \
--env FIGMA_FILE_KEY="${FIGMA_FILE_KEY}" \
--out json=results.json \
figma-load-test.js
Step 3: Capacity Planning
interface FigmaCapacityPlan {
planTier: string;
measuredLimitPerMinute: number;
currentUsagePerMinute: number;
headroomPercent: number;
recommendation: string;
}
function planCapacity(
measuredLimit: number,
currentUsage: number,
planTier: string
): FigmaCapacityPlan {
const headroom = ((measuredLimit - currentUsage) / measuredLimit) * 100;
let recommendation: string;
if (headroom > 50) {
recommendation = 'Adequate capacity. Monitor monthly.';
} else if (headroom > 20) {
recommendation = 'Approaching limits. Implement caching and batching.';
} else {
recommendation = 'Near capacity. Upgrade plan or reduce request volume.';
}
return {
planTier,
measuredLimitPerMinute: measuredLimit,
currentUsagePerMinute: currentUsage,
headroomPercent: Math.round(headroom),
recommendation,
};
}
Step 4: Scaling Strategies
// Strategy 1: Request coalescing
// Multiple callers requesting the same file get a single API call
class RequestCoalescer {
private pending = new Map<string, Promise<any>>();
async get(key: string, fetcher: () => Promise<any>): Promise<any> {
if (this.pending.has(key)) {
return this.pending.get(key)!;
}
const promise = fetcher().finally(() => this.pending.delete(key));
this.pending.set(key, promise);
return promise;
}
}
const coalescer = new RequestCoalescer();
// 10 simultaneous requests for the same file = 1 API call
const results = await Promise.all(
Array(10).fill(null).map(() =>
coalescer.get(fileKey, () => figmaClient.getFile(fileKey))
)
);
// Strategy 2: Stagger requests across time
import PQueue from 'p-queue';
const figmaQueue = new PQueue({
concurrency: 3,
interval: 1000,
intervalCap: 5, // Max 5 requests per second
});
// Strategy 3: Pre-fetch during off-peak hours
// Run design token sync at 3 AM, cache results for the day
Step 5: Benchmark Report Template
## Figma API Benchmark Report
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Plan:** [Starter/Pro/Org/Enterprise]
**Seat:** [Full/Collab/Viewer]
### Rate Limit Findings
| Endpoint | Measured Limit/min | First 429 At | Retry-After |
|----------|-------------------|--------------|-------------|
| GET /v1/files/:key?depth=1 | ~30 | Request #31 | 60s |
| GET /v1/files/:key/nodes | ~30 | Request #32 | 60s |
| GET /v1/images/:key | ~20 | Request #21 | 60s |
### Latency
| Endpoint | P50 | P95 | P99 |
|----------|-----|-----|-----|
| /v1/files (depth=1) | 200ms | 500ms | 1200ms |
| /v1/files (full) | 800ms | 2000ms | 4000ms |
| /v1/images | 300ms | 800ms | 1500ms |
### Recommendations
- Cache file metadata (changes infrequently)
- Use webhooks instead of polling
- Batch node IDs in single requests
- Use `depth=1` unless full tree is needed
Output
- k6 load test measuring actual rate limits
- Capacity plan with headroom analysis
- Scaling strategies implemented
- Benchmark report documented
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| All requests 429'd | Rate too aggressive | Start lower, ramp gradually |
| Inconsistent limits | Shared rate limit bucket | Other services using same token |
| k6 connection errors | Too many parallel VUs | Reduce preAllocatedVUs |
| Results vary between runs | Leaky bucket state | Wait 5min between test runs |
Examples
Run the Step 1 k6 script against a staging file and read the two numbers that matter:
k6 run --vus 5 --duration 2m figma-load-test.js
http_req_duration..............: avg=412ms p(95)=890ms
http_req_failed................: 2.1% (all 429 — rate limit ceiling found)
figma_rate_limited.............: 27 ✗ first 429 at ~55 req/min sustained
That output feeds Step 3 capacity planning directly: at ~55 req/min per token before 429s, a 10,000-file nightly sync needs batching via /nodes?ids= (Step 4) or multiple OAuth users — not more concurrency.
Record results in the benchmark template: references/benchmark-report-template.md.
Resources
Next Steps
For reliability patterns, see figma-reliability-patterns.