Sec filing types
Skills for quant research with LLMs that don't fall for the traps nobody talks about. Lookahead bias, ATM detection, survivorship, transaction-cost realism — 10 skills + 11 reproducible evals showing 8 of them measurably improve Haiku output. Claude Code & Cursor compatible, MIT.
npx -y skills add jefrnc/quant-llm-skills --skill sec-filing-typesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when interpreting SEC filings, EDGAR data, or specific form types (S-3, 424B, 8-K, 10-K, 13D/G, Form 4, 20-F, 6-K, F-1, NT 10-K, etc.). Disambiguates what each form actually means for a company's float, dilution risk, and material events.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
8.1 KB, ~2.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
SEC Filing Types
A reference and decision guide for interpreting SEC forms in the context of small-cap and quant research. Most quant code mishandles forms because it treats "a filing exists" as the signal — the form TYPE and SPECIFIC ITEM are the signal.
Core principle
A form's name tells you the company's PERMISSION to do something. The specific item or supplement tells you whether they ACTED on it.
- An effective
S-3means a company can sell shares from the shelf. It does NOT mean they did. - An
S-3plus a recent424B5plus a 10-Q reference to "at-the-market offering" means they ARE selling. That is the dilution signal. - An
8-Kis a sealed envelope until you read its specific items. Item 1.01 is benign or terrifying depending on the agreement.
Always inspect the SPECIFIC item / supplement / amendment, never the form name alone.
Form reference (focused on small-cap dilution context)
Registration and offerings (the dilution machinery)
| Form | What it means | Dilution implication |
|---|---|---|
| S-1 / S-1/A | IPO registration / amendment | New issuer; lockups in effect |
| S-3 | Shelf registration (US issuer) | Permission, not action. Effective shelf = capacity to sell |
| S-3ASR | Automatic shelf (large issuers) | Same as S-3 but no SEC review delay |
| S-8 | Employee plan registration | Adds shares to float as RSUs/options vest |
| F-1 / F-3 | Foreign issuer equivalents of S-1 / S-3 | Same logic, FPI |
| 424B1–424B7 | Prospectus supplement (actual takedown) | THIS is the action. Specifies shares offered, price, agents |
| FWP | Free writing prospectus | Marketing material, often pre-pricing of an offering |
Material events
| Form | Item | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 8-K | 1.01 | Material definitive agreement (financing, partnership) — read the agreement |
| 8-K | 1.03 | Bankruptcy / receivership — usually catastrophic |
| 8-K | 2.01 | Completion of acquisition — share issuance possible |
| 8-K | 2.02 | Earnings results |
| 8-K | 3.02 | Unregistered equity sale (private placement / PIPE) — dilution happened |
| 8-K | 3.03 | Modification of rights of holders |
| 8-K | 4.01 / 4.02 | Auditor change / non-reliance on prior financials — red flag |
| 8-K | 5.02 | Officer / director departure or appointment |
| 8-K | 5.07 | Shareholder vote results |
| 8-K | 7.01 | Reg FD disclosure (often offering announcement) |
| 8-K | 8.01 | Other events — read the body |
Periodic reports
| Form | Cadence | Use for |
|---|---|---|
| 10-K | Annual (US issuer) | Cover-page shares outstanding; full disclosures |
| 10-K/A | Annual amendment | Supersedes the original from its own filing date forward |
| 10-Q | Quarterly | Cover-page shares; subsequent-events note critical for offerings |
| 20-F | Annual (FPI) | FPI equivalent of 10-K |
| 6-K | Interim (FPI) | FPI equivalent of 10-Q + 8-K combined |
| NT 10-K / NT 10-Q | Late filing notice | Form 12b-25 — flag for compliance / Nasdaq listing risk |
Ownership
| Form | Filer | Trigger / use |
|---|---|---|
| SC 13D | Beneficial owner >5% (active intent) | Activist or controlling stake |
| SC 13G | Beneficial owner >5% (passive) | Institutional (Vanguard, BlackRock) |
| SC 13D/A, SC 13G/A | Amendments | Material change in holdings or intent |
| 13F | Institutional manager ($100M+) | Quarterly, 45-day lag — never realtime |
| Form 3 | Initial insider statement | First-time officer / director / 10% holder |
| Form 4 | Insider transaction | Buys, sells, option exercises — usually within 2 business days |
| Form 5 | Annual catch-up insider | Transactions exempt from Form 4 |
| Form 144 | Notice of intent to sell restricted shares | Affiliate signaling intent (not always executed) |
Governance & misc
| Form | Use |
|---|---|
| DEF 14A | Proxy statement; record-date share count, exec comp |
| PRE 14A | Preliminary proxy |
| DEFA14A | Additional proxy materials |
| CORRESP, UPLOAD | SEC correspondence (letters, comment-letter responses) |
Decision rules small-cap-relevant
-
"Is this company actively diluting?" Need (a) effective S-3/F-3 + (b) 424B in the last ~30 days OR 8-K item 3.02 + (c) low cash runway in last 10-Q. All three together = active dilution. Just an S-3 = capacity only.
-
"Is the offering toxic structure?" Look at the 424B for: warrants attached, pricing at discount to market, placement agent identity (see
bank-tier-classification), ELOC / equity line language, "best efforts" vs "firm commitment". -
"Should I trust the latest 10-K numbers?" Check for any 10-K/A filed AFTER the 10-K. The amendment supersedes from its own filing_date forward (see
lookahead-safety). -
"Does this 8-K matter?" Items 1.01, 1.03, 3.02, 4.01, 4.02, 5.02 require reading the body. Item 2.02 (earnings) is routine. Item 7.01 is often a heads-up of a pending offering — pair with same-day or next-day 424B watch.
-
"Is this insider buying or selling?" Form 4 transaction codes: P (open-market purchase) and S (open-market sale) matter most. A (grant), M (option exercise), F (tax withhold) are noise for sentiment.
-
"Late filing — should I care?" NT 10-K / NT 10-Q triggers a 15-day extension (5 for 10-Q). Failure to file by the extension creates Nasdaq compliance risk and is a short-side signal for very small companies.
Common confusions
- S-1 vs S-3. S-1 is for new issuers / first registrations. S-3 is for established issuers raising via a shelf. Confusing these mis-frames the company's stage.
- "Effective" vs "filed". S-3 has both: SEC declares effective some weeks after filing. Until effective, no takedown is possible.
- 424B variants. B1–B7 differ in WHAT is being supplemented. B5 is the most common for small-cap shelf takedowns; B2 for IPO-related; B4 for FPIs. The variant matters for parsing but all are takedowns.
- 13D vs 13G. Same threshold (>5%), different intent. 13D = active, 13G = passive. A 13G → 13D conversion is a strong signal.
- 6-K is not 8-K. FPIs have no 8-K; material events flow through 6-K. Don't filter for "8-K" on FPIs — you'll miss everything.
- Form 144 ≠ Form 4. 144 is intent to sell restricted shares; the actual sale (if it happens) appears later as a Form 4. Treating 144 as an executed sale is a common quant bug.
Workflow when analyzing a filing list
- Bucket filings by category (registration, periodic, event, ownership).
- For 8-Ks, immediately partition by item number — don't treat them as a single bucket.
- For each registration form, find the corresponding takedown (424B / 8-K item 3.02 / S-8 effective date) — registration without takedown is capacity, not action.
- For amendments (10-K/A, S-3/A, etc.), apply lookahead-safety: the amendment is known only from ITS filing date.
- For ownership filings, dedupe joint filers and treat 13F with the 45-day lag explicitly.
Phrases that should trigger this skill
- "what does an 8-K item X mean"
- "is an S-3 a dilution event"
- "should I worry about this 424B"
- "13D vs 13G"
- "explain this filing"
- any specific form name: S-1, S-3, 424B5, 8-K, 10-K, 20-F, 6-K, 13D, 13G, 13F, Form 4, NT 10-K, DEF 14A
- "EDGAR" + analysis
- "is this company diluting"
What this skill is NOT
This is not a parser or extractor. It does not pull values from filings.
It tells you what each form / item / amendment MEANS so the LLM can
reason correctly about the data once it's pulled. Combine with
lookahead-safety for time semantics, and (when available)
atm-detection and bank-tier-classification for dilution-specific
inference.