Mcp developer
Use when building, debugging, or extending MCP servers or clients that connect AI systems with external tools and data sources. Invoke to implement tool handlers, configure resource providers, set up stdio/HTTP/SSE transport layers, validate schemas with Zod or Pydantic, debug protocol compliance issues, or scaffold complete MCP server/client projects using TypeScript or Python SDKs.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill mcp-developerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.6 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
MCP Developer
Senior MCP (Model Context Protocol) developer with deep expertise in building servers and clients that connect AI systems with external tools and data sources.
Core Workflow
- Analyze requirements — Identify data sources, tools needed, and client apps
- Initialize project —
npx @modelcontextprotocol/create-server my-server(TypeScript) orpip install mcp+ scaffold (Python) - Design protocol — Define resource URIs, tool schemas (Zod/Pydantic), and prompt templates
- Implement — Register tools and resource handlers; configure transport (stdio/SSE/HTTP)
- Test — Run
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspectorto verify protocol compliance interactively; confirm tools appear, schemas accept valid inputs, and error responses are well-formed JSON-RPC 2.0. Feedback loop: if schema validation fails → inspect Zod/Pydantic error output → fix schema definition → re-run inspector. If a tool call returns a malformed response → check transport serialisation → fix handler → re-test. - Deploy — Package, add auth/rate-limiting, configure env vars, monitor
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol | references/protocol.md | Message types, lifecycle, JSON-RPC 2.0 |
| TypeScript SDK | references/typescript-sdk.md | Building servers/clients in Node.js |
| Python SDK | references/python-sdk.md | Building servers/clients in Python |
| Tools | references/tools.md | Tool definitions, schemas, execution |
| Resources | references/resources.md | Resource providers, URIs, templates |
Minimal Working Example
TypeScript — Tool with Zod Validation
import { McpServer } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js";
import { StdioServerTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js";
import { z } from "zod";
const server = new McpServer({ name: "my-server", version: "1.1.0" });
// Register a tool with validated input schema
server.tool(
"get_weather",
"Fetch current weather for a location",
{
location: z.string().min(1).describe("City name or coordinates"),
units: z.enum(["celsius", "fahrenheit"]).default("celsius"),
},
async ({ location, units }) => {
// Implementation: call external API, transform response
const data = await fetchWeather(location, units); // your fetch logic
return {
content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(data) }],
};
}
);
// Register a resource provider
server.resource(
"config://app",
"Application configuration",
async (uri) => ({
contents: [{ uri: uri.href, text: JSON.stringify(getConfig()), mimeType: "application/json" }],
})
);
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();
await server.connect(transport);
Python — Tool with Pydantic Validation
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
mcp = FastMCP("my-server")
class WeatherInput(BaseModel):
location: str = Field(..., min_length=1, description="City name or coordinates")
units: str = Field("celsius", pattern="^(celsius|fahrenheit)$")
@mcp.tool()
async def get_weather(location: str, units: str = "celsius") -> str:
"""Fetch current weather for a location."""
data = await fetch_weather(location, units) # your fetch logic
return str(data)
@mcp.resource("config://app")
async def app_config() -> str:
"""Expose application configuration as a resource."""
return json.dumps(get_config())
if __name__ == "__main__":
mcp.run() # defaults to stdio transport
Expected tool call flow:
Client → { "method": "tools/call", "params": { "name": "get_weather", "arguments": { "location": "Berlin" } } }
Server → { "result": { "content": [{ "type": "text", "text": "{\"temp\": 18, \"units\": \"celsius\"}" }] } }
Constraints
MUST DO
- Implement JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol correctly
- Validate all inputs with schemas (Zod/Pydantic)
- Use proper transport mechanisms (stdio/HTTP/SSE)
- Implement comprehensive error handling
- Add authentication and authorization
- Log protocol messages for debugging
- Test protocol compliance thoroughly
- Document server capabilities
MUST NOT DO
- Skip input validation on tool inputs
- Expose sensitive data in resource content
- Ignore protocol version compatibility
- Mix synchronous code with async transports
- Hardcode credentials or secrets
- Return unstructured errors to clients
- Deploy without rate limiting
- Skip security controls
Output Templates
When implementing MCP features, provide:
- Server/client implementation file
- Schema definitions (tools, resources, prompts)
- Configuration file (transport, auth, etc.)
- Brief explanation of design decisions
What ships with it: 5 files
44.5 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- protocol.md4.9 KB
- python-sdk.md9.6 KB
- resources.md11.9 KB
- tools.md10.2 KB
- typescript-sdk.md7.8 KB
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most debug triage skills give in ~1.1k tokens
Counted across 1,020 of the 1,639 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Find root cause before attempting any fixin 134 of 1020, across 118 files
- Create a failing test case before implementing a fixin 109 of 1020, across 95 files
- Read error messages and stack traces completelyin 102 of 1020, across 88 files
- Reproduce the issue consistently before investigatingin 90 of 1020, across 77 files
- Make the smallest possible change to test a hypothesisin 90 of 1020, across 76 files
- Trace data flow backward to find the sourcein 84 of 1020, across 70 files
- Form a single hypothesis before testingin 78 of 1020, across 64 files
- Implement only one fix at a timein 76 of 1020, across 63 files
- Question the architecture if three fixes failin 73 of 1020, across 59 files
- Add diagnostic instrumentation at component boundariesin 68 of 1020, across 56 files
- Compare broken code against working examplesin 68 of 1020, across 57 files
- Write a regression test before applying the fixin 62 of 1020, across 55 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.