agentsclimarketplace

Skill estimation

Skill javiarmesto/ALDC-AL-Development-Collection/skills/skill-estimation

AL project estimation for Business Central. Use when estimating development effort, creating cost models, SWOT analysis, or structuring project proposals.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add javiarmesto/ALDC-AL-Development-Collection --skill skill-estimation

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

9.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Skill: AL Project Estimation

Purpose

Estimate AL/Business Central projects: complexity scoring, PERT 3-point estimation, SWOT/DAFO risk analysis, cost breakdown by phase, resource allocation, and structured presales documentation.

When to Load

This skill should be loaded when:

  • A new BC/AL project needs time and cost estimation
  • A feasibility assessment or SWOT analysis is required before commitment
  • A presales proposal or technical assessment document is being created
  • Resource allocation and team composition need to be defined
  • A project plan with milestones and payment schedule is needed

Core Patterns

Pattern 1: Intake Questions (Mandatory)

Before any estimation, gather these parameters:

## Project Intake — Required Information

### 1. Project Identity
- Project name (will be used for folder structure)
- Brief description: What problem does it solve?

### 2. Cost Parameters (MANDATORY)
- Hourly rate (e.g., €75/hour, $100/hour)
- Currency (EUR, USD, GBP)
- Contingency buffer: Yes/No (default 15-20%)
- Risk buffer: Low (10%), Medium (20%), High (30%)

### 3. Technical Context
- Target BC version: SaaS, On-Premise, or both?
- Target delivery date
- Existing codebase? (repository URL or workspace path)
- Reference repositories for similar functionality?

### 4. Team (optional)
- Available developers: Junior, Mid, Senior?
- BC experience level: New, Experienced, Expert?

PAUSE — do NOT proceed without cost parameters. Estimation without rates is meaningless.

Pattern 2: Complexity Scoring

Score each dimension 1-10 to derive overall project complexity:

## Complexity Assessment

| Dimension | Score (1-10) | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Data Model | /10 | Tables, relations, migration needs |
| Business Logic | /10 | Codeunits, validations, calculations |
| UI Complexity | /10 | Pages, customizations, RoleCenter |
| Integrations | /10 | External APIs, events, webhooks |
| Reporting | /10 | Reports, queries, analytics |
| Security | /10 | Permissions, data sensitivity, audit |
| Testing | /10 | Test coverage needed, edge cases |
| Migration/Upgrade | /10 | Data migration, version compatibility |

**Overall Complexity**: (sum / 80) × 10 = X/10

Object count estimation:

Object TypeLow ComplexityMediumHigh
Table2-4 hrs4-8 hrs8-16 hrs
Page (Card/List)2-4 hrs4-8 hrs8-16 hrs
Page (Document)4-8 hrs8-16 hrs16-32 hrs
Codeunit2-8 hrs8-16 hrs16-40 hrs
Report4-8 hrs8-16 hrs16-32 hrs
Integration8-16 hrs16-32 hrs32-80 hrs

Pattern 3: PERT 3-Point Estimation

Use the Program Evaluation and Review Technique for each task:

## PERT Formula

E = (O + 4M + P) / 6

Where:
- O = Optimistic (best case, everything goes right)
- M = Most Likely (normal case, typical obstacles)
- P = Pessimistic (worst case, major obstacles)
- E = Expected duration

Apply per development phase:

## Phase Breakdown

### Phase 1: Analysis & Design
| Task | O (hrs) | M (hrs) | P (hrs) | E (hrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements analysis | 8 | 16 | 24 | 16 |
| Technical design | 8 | 12 | 20 | 13 |
| Architecture review | 4 | 8 | 12 | 8 |
| **Subtotal** | **20** | **36** | **56** | **37** |

### Phase 2: Development
| Task | O (hrs) | M (hrs) | P (hrs) | E (hrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tables & data model | X | X | X | X |
| Pages & UI | X | X | X | X |
| Business logic | X | X | X | X |
| Integrations | X | X | X | X |
| **Subtotal** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** |

### Phase 3: Testing & QA
| Task | O (hrs) | M (hrs) | P (hrs) | E (hrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit tests | X | X | X | X |
| Integration tests | X | X | X | X |
| UAT support | X | X | X | X |
| Bug fixes | X | X | X | X |
| **Subtotal** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** |

### Phase 4: Deployment & Documentation
| Task | O (hrs) | M (hrs) | P (hrs) | E (hrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical documentation | X | X | X | X |
| Training materials | X | X | X | X |
| Deployment | X | X | X | X |
| Post-go-live support | X | X | X | X |
| **Subtotal** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** |

Pattern 4: SWOT/DAFO Analysis

Structured risk and opportunity assessment:

## SWOT Analysis

### Strengths (Internal Positive)
| ID | Strength | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | [e.g., Team has BC experience] | High/Medium/Low |

### Opportunities (External Positive)
| ID | Opportunity | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| O1 | [e.g., Standard BC API available] | High/Medium/Low |

### Weaknesses (Internal Negative)
| ID | Weakness | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | [e.g., No existing test suite] | High | Implement TDD from start |

### Threats (External Negative)
| ID | Threat | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | [e.g., BC version upgrade mid-project] | Medium | High | Pin BC version |

## Feasibility Score

| Criterion | Score (1-10) |
|---|---|
| Technical Feasibility | /10 |
| Resource Feasibility | /10 |
| Timeline Feasibility | /10 |
| Economic Feasibility | /10 |
| **Overall** | **/10** |

### Recommendation
- [ ] **GO** — Project viable, proceed
- [ ] **CAUTION** — Viable with conditions
- [ ] **NO-GO** — Not recommended currently

Pattern 5: Cost Summary and Payment Milestones

Consolidate estimation into a financial summary:

## Cost Summary

| Concept | Hours | Rate | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis & Design | X | [RATE] | [TOTAL] |
| Development | X | [RATE] | [TOTAL] |
| Testing & QA | X | [RATE] | [TOTAL] |
| Deployment & Docs | X | [RATE] | [TOTAL] |
| **Subtotal** | **X** | | **[TOTAL]** |
| Contingency ([%]%) | X | | [TOTAL] |
| Risk Buffer ([%]%) | X | | [TOTAL] |
| **TOTAL** | **X** | | **[CURRENCY] [TOTAL]** |

## Payment Milestones

| Milestone | % | Amount | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Start | 20% | [X] | SOW signed, project plan |
| Design Approved | 20% | [X] | Architecture approved |
| Development Complete | 30% | [X] | Code delivered, tests pass |
| UAT Approved | 20% | [X] | User acceptance sign-off |
| Go-Live | 10% | [X] | Production deployment |

Workflow

Step 1: Intake

  1. Ask mandatory intake questions (Pattern 1)
  2. Confirm cost parameters — do NOT skip this
  3. If reference repositories provided, analyze them for scope comparison

Step 2: Analyze

  1. Score complexity dimensions (Pattern 2)
  2. Count estimated objects (tables, pages, codeunits, reports)
  3. Identify integration points and external dependencies
  4. If existing codebase, use al_search_objects to measure current scope

Step 3: Estimate

  1. Apply PERT 3-point estimation per phase (Pattern 3)
  2. Use complexity-based hour ranges for object estimation
  3. Apply standard ratios:
    • Testing = 30-40% of development
    • Documentation = 10-15% of total
    • Integration = typically underestimated by 50% — adjust accordingly
    • Data migration = 15-20% of total (if applicable)
    • BC version testing = 5-10% for compatibility

Step 4: Risk Assessment

  1. Conduct SWOT analysis (Pattern 4)
  2. Calculate feasibility score
  3. Provide clear GO / CAUTION / NO-GO recommendation

Step 5: Deliver Proposal

  1. Create cost summary with payment milestones (Pattern 5)
  2. Define resource allocation (roles, FTE, duration)
  3. Compile all sections into presales documentation
  4. Store in Technical_PreSales/{project-slug}/ folder structure

PAUSE — present proposal for stakeholder review before commitment.

Estimation Guidelines

RuleGuideline
Testing effortAlways 30-40% of development hours
DocumentationNever skip — 10-15% of total hours
Integration complexityUsually underestimated — add 50% buffer
Data migrationAdd if mentioned — 15-20% of total
BC version testingAdd 5-10% for compatibility verification
Training8-16 hours per user group
Contingency15-20% standard, 25-30% for high uncertainty

References

Constraints

  • This skill covers project estimation, risk analysis, and presales documentation
  • Do NOT estimate without cost parameters (hourly rate, currency) — ask first
  • Do NOT build, compile, or deploy code — estimation only
  • Do NOT modify production source code — analysis and documentation only
  • Do NOT skip the SWOT analysis for any project — risk awareness is mandatory
  • Architecture design → al-architect agent | Technical specifications → al-spec.create workflow | Implementation → al-conductor agent

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 619,087. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.