agentsclimarketplace

Blue ocean strategy

Skill jacob-balslev/skills/skills/reasoning-strategy/blue-ocean-strategy

Public Agent Skills library exported from skill-graph. Install: npx skills add jacob-balslev/skills

Install
npx -y skills add jacob-balslev/skills --skill blue-ocean-strategy

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when creating, auditing, or pressure-testing a Blue Ocean Strategy: value innovation, strategy canvas, Four Actions Framework, ERRC grid, six paths, buyer utility, noncustomers, and commercial viability. Covers reconstructing market boundaries, breaking the value-cost trade-off, shifting from competitor benchmarking to alternative/noncustomer insight, and turning the result into a new value curve. Do NOT use for industry-structure diagnosis alone (use porters-five-forces), durable moat classification (use seven-powers), or integrated five-choice strategy cascades (use playing-to-win).

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

18.9 KB, ~2.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Concept of the skill

What it is: Blue Ocean Strategy is W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne's market-creating strategy method. It helps an agent design value innovation by breaking from head-to-head competition and reconstructing market boundaries, buyer utility, price, and cost around a new value curve.

Mental model: Start with the industry's current strategy canvas, then ask which factors buyers receive and which factors the industry overfunds. Use six paths and noncustomer analysis to find demand outside the accepted boundary. Use eliminate, reduce, raise, and create choices to design a value curve that is meaningfully different and commercially viable.

Why it exists: Agents often say "blue ocean" when they mean niche positioning, feature differentiation, or cheaper pricing. This skill forces the answer to show the mechanism of new demand creation.

What it is NOT: It is not Five Forces, Seven Powers, Playing to Win, SWOT, generic innovation brainstorming, or a moat claim.

Adjacent concepts: value innovation, strategy canvas, value curve, Four Actions Framework, ERRC grid, six paths, buyer utility, noncustomers, price corridor, adoption hurdles.

One-line analogy: Blue Ocean Strategy redraws the game board rather than playing harder on the existing one.

Common misconception: A blue ocean is not merely "different." It must create a leap in buyer value while changing the cost structure enough that the strategy is viable.

Blue Ocean Strategy

Coverage

This skill teaches agents to:

  1. Separate Blue Ocean Strategy from generic differentiation, low-cost competition, and competitor avoidance.
  2. Draw the current strategy canvas and identify the industry's accepted factors of competition.
  3. Use the six paths framework to reconstruct market boundaries.
  4. Look beyond current customers to the three tiers of noncustomers.
  5. Use buyer utility to find utility blocks and demand-expansion opportunities.
  6. Apply the Four Actions Framework and ERRC grid to create a new value curve.
  7. Test value innovation against utility, strategic price, target cost, and adoption hurdles.
  8. Translate the analysis into a clear strategic profile, risks, and next evidence requests.

Philosophy of the skill

Blue Ocean Strategy is useful because it makes innovation accountable to both value and economics. A creative idea is not enough. A lower price is not enough. A new segment is not enough. The method asks whether the offering changes what buyers value, removes costly assumptions from the old category, reaches latent demand, and can be delivered with a coherent profit logic.

The skill should make an agent less impressed by novelty and more disciplined about reconstruction. The goal is not to ignore competitors; it is to understand the old competitive logic well enough to escape it on purpose.

Workflow

1. Define the current red-ocean frame

State the category before changing it.

Industry or category:
Geography or channel:
Current buyer group:
Current competitors and alternatives:
Current factors of competition:
Current cost drivers:
Current noncustomers:

If the category is too broad, narrow it before drawing the strategy canvas. "Healthcare", "AI tools", or "education" is too broad for useful factor-level analysis.

2. Draw the strategy canvas

List the factors the industry competes on and invests in, then compare the current offering, major rivals, and alternatives.

Factor of competitionIndustry emphasisOur current levelAlternative levelBuyer value evidence
Pricehigh / medium / low
Conveniencehigh / medium / low
Trust or risk reductionhigh / medium / low
Speedhigh / medium / low
Customizationhigh / medium / low

Use factors buyers can recognize. Internal activities such as "machine learning pipeline quality" only belong on the canvas if buyers directly experience them as utility, price, risk, speed, simplicity, status, or reliability.

3. Search across the six paths

Use the six paths to find new demand by changing the lens.

PathQuestion
Alternative industriesWhat do buyers use to solve the same job outside this industry?
Strategic groupsWhat trade-offs separate premium, mid-market, and low-cost groups?
Buyer groupsWho buys, uses, influences, maintains, or pays, and what changes if the target buyer shifts?
Complementary offeringsWhat happens before, during, or after use that shapes value?
Functional-emotional orientationIs the category over-indexed on function when emotion matters, or the reverse?
TimeWhich trends are irreversible enough to reshape value before the industry catches up?

Do not present all six paths as equal. Name the one or two paths with the strongest evidence.

4. Look to noncustomers

Blue oceans usually come from demand beyond current loyal buyers.

TierWho they areUseful question
First tierBuyers on the edge who minimally use the category and may leaveWhat makes them tolerate the category rather than love it?
Second tierBuyers who consciously refuse the categoryWhat barrier, trade-off, price, complexity, or risk makes them opt out?
Third tierBuyers distant from the current categoryWhat alternative job, context, or constraint keeps them outside the market definition?

Current-customer feedback can improve the red ocean. Noncustomer insight is what can reshape demand.

5. Apply eliminate, reduce, raise, and create

Turn insight into a new value curve.

ActionQuestionGood answerWeak answer
EliminateWhich accepted factors should disappear?Removes costly features, rituals, channels, or complexity buyers do not valueRemoves anything expensive without checking utility
ReduceWhich factors should fall below industry standard?Lowers over-served factors that do not drive demandCuts quality where buyers still care
RaiseWhich factors should rise above industry standard?Lifts utility, trust, access, speed, or simplicity in a way buyers noticeRaises every factor and inflates cost
CreateWhich factors should appear for the first time?Adds a new utility source that unlocks noncustomersAdds novelty without demand evidence

The ERRC grid is not a brainstorm list. It must produce a new strategic profile that is divergent, focused, and easy to explain.

6. Test commercial viability

Do not stop at a novel value curve.

Buyer utility:
- What utility block is removed?
- Which buyer experience stage improves?
- Which noncustomer tier becomes reachable?

Strategic price:
- What price opens mass demand or a larger market?
- Which alternative sets the price reference?

Target cost:
- Which eliminated or reduced factors fund the new curve?
- What operating model makes the price profitable?

Adoption:
- What buyer, partner, channel, employee, or regulator resistance could block the move?
- What must be true for adoption to work?

A move that increases value but cannot hit target cost is not value innovation. A move that lowers cost but does not unlock buyer utility is low-cost competition.

Output Template

## Blue Ocean Strategy Pass

### Current Strategy Canvas
Industry/category:
Current factors of competition:
Current strategic profile:
Similarity trap:

### Boundary Reconstruction
Strongest six-path lens:
Alternative/noncustomer insight:
Demand creation hypothesis:

### ERRC Grid
| Eliminate | Reduce | Raise | Create |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |

### New Value Curve
Focused factors:
Divergence from current industry logic:
Simple tagline:

### Commercial Viability
- Buyer utility:
- Strategic price:
- Target cost:
- Adoption hurdles:

### Evidence Gaps
- What must be tested:
- What would disprove this is a blue ocean:
- What would make this only ordinary differentiation:

Anti-Patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsRepair
Competitor benchmarking with a blue-ocean labelIt optimizes the old factors of competitionStart with the strategy canvas, then reconstruct factors
Raise/create onlyIt increases buyer value but usually raises costAdd eliminate/reduce moves that fund the new curve
Cost cutting onlyIt lowers cost without creating new demandTie reductions to buyer utility and noncustomer conversion
Current-customer-only researchIt improves current demand instead of unlocking latent demandAnalyze all three tiers of noncustomers
Novelty as strategyNew features are not value innovation by themselvesTest utility, price, cost, and adoption
Six paths as loose brainstormingThe framework becomes a creativity promptShow which boundary is reconstructed and why it matters

Boundaries

Use Blue Ocean Strategy when the task is to create new demand through value innovation.

Use another tool when the task is narrower:

NeedBetter owner
Industry attractiveness, bargaining power, entrants, substitutes, rivalryporters-five-forces
Durable moat source classificationseven-powers
Integrated choices across aspiration, arena, advantage, capabilities, systemsplaying-to-win
Choosing among strategy frameworksframework-fit-analysis
Ranking a known list of initiativesprioritization
Designing verification gates for a processmethodology

Verification

Before finishing, verify:

  • The current industry/category and factors of competition are explicit.
  • The answer includes a current strategy canvas or value-curve comparison.
  • At least one six-path lens is used to reconstruct a market boundary.
  • Noncustomers are considered, not only current customers.
  • The ERRC grid includes eliminate, reduce, raise, and create moves.
  • The proposed curve is focused and divergent, not "raise everything."
  • Buyer utility, strategic price, target cost, and adoption hurdles are tested.
  • The answer labels assumptions and evidence gaps.
  • The response does not present ordinary differentiation, low price, Five Forces, Seven Powers, OKRs, or a Playing to Win cascade as Blue Ocean Strategy.

References

  • references/blue-ocean-strategy-sources.md
  • references/upstream-displacement-2026-05-28.md

Do NOT Use When

Use another skill when the task falls outside the declared scope, matches an anti_examples prompt, or is owned by a more specific related skill.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.