Forge supply chain
Skill is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill/.github/skills/forge-supply-chain
A production full-stack engineering skill suite for AI coding agents—covering UI, UX, security, databases, auth, caching, testing, performance, and deployment.
npx -y skills add is-bo/fullstack-forge-skill --skill forge-supply-chainAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 18 days oldThe repository was created 18 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Inspect dependencies, build integrity, provenance, releases, licenses, actions, and secret exposure across the delivery chain. Activate automatically for any project consuming or publishing software artifacts when that concern is relevant to a software-engineering request.
SKILL.md
4.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
forge-supply-chain: Software supply chain
Purpose
Inspect dependencies, build integrity, provenance, releases, licenses, actions, and secret exposure across the delivery chain.
This is an agent playbook, not a claim of standalone analyzer coverage. Apply
fullstack-forge/references/shared/module-contract.md
for common applicability, evidence, command-safety, mutation, verification, and completion rules.
Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.
Automatic activation signals
Activate when a request or direct repository evidence involves software supply chain, when
the user explicitly names forge-supply-chain, or when discovery proves an applicable boundary.
- Any project consuming or publishing software artifacts
When not to activate
- No exemption for executable release artifacts
Automated support
Relevant discovery inputs are:
- lockfiles
- build and release workflows
- artifact and license inventory
Available deterministic support, where present:
- Use
inspect-dependenciesfor its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence asNOT_VERIFIED. - Use
inspect-cifor its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence asNOT_VERIFIED. - Use
scan-secret-patternsfor its bounded evidence when present; treat unavailable runtime evidence asNOT_VERIFIED.
Agent inspection procedure
- Audit dependencies with the lockfile: known vulnerabilities, abandoned packages, and unexpected install scripts.
- Verify lockfile consistency, pinning strategy, and provenance for critical packages, including typosquat review for recent additions.
- Inspect CI workflows for action pinning, least-privilege tokens, fork safety, and secret exposure in logs.
- Trace release-artifact integrity: reproducibility, checksums, and signing or provenance attestation.
- Check container base images, the update strategy, and license compatibility across the dependency tree.
Manual inspection requirements:
- Triage vulnerabilities for actual reachability and compensating controls
- Review maintainer and registry trust for critical dependencies
Stack-specific guidance:
- Disable or isolate install scripts where compatible and use least-privilege CI tokens
Evidence to collect
For formal findings, also follow fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md. Record the module's
inspected boundary, relevant tests, direct observations, and unavailable evidence.
Primary standards used as criteria, not proof of compliance:
- SLSA 1.2
- NIST SSDF
- OpenSSF Scorecard concepts
Common production failures
- Verify lockfile integrity, direct and transitive dependency review, vulnerability output, lifecycle scripts, and abandoned packages
- Inspect CI action pinning, token permissions, untrusted build inputs, artifact signing, provenance, checksums, reproducibility, and protected release flow
- Validate declared licenses, notices, source attribution, generated-file provenance, and secret scanning
Missing-control checks
For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned
NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED status. The list is a routing checklist, not
evidence by itself.
- Vulnerable dependencies
- Abandoned packages
- Unexpected install scripts
- Lockfile consistency
- Dependency pinning
- Package provenance
- Build reproducibility
- CI action pinning
- Generated artifacts
- Secrets in build logs
- SBOM generation
- License compatibility
- Typosquatting
- Container base images
- Update strategy
- Compromised transitive dependencies
- Release provenance
- SLSA concepts where appropriate
Commands and tools
- Run
forge supply-chain audit --jsonorfullstack-forge supply-chain audit --jsonwhen an explicit audit is requested and the CLI is installed. Normal feature work does not require it. - Use the deterministic support named above only for its documented bounded evidence.
Safe fixes
- Pin action commits and compatible dependency patches after tests
- Correct license inventory and checksums
Approval-required changes
- Major dependency upgrades, replacing registries, rotating tokens, or changing release authority
Verification
- Rebuild from a clean checkout with the lockfile
- Compare artifacts, checksums, SBOM, and provenance
Completion contract
Apply the shared module contract and the module-specific limitations below.
Known limitations
- A vulnerability identifier alone does not prove exploitability or safety