agentsclimarketplace

Prd review

Skill initmahesh/miniPM/skills/prd-review

Use this skill whenever a user wants to review a PRD, audit a product spec, run a PRD quality check, or get structured feedback on a product requirements document. Triggers include: "review this PRD", "check my PRD", "audit this spec", "is my PRD good", "PRD review checklist", "give feedback on my product doc", or when a user pastes a PRD and asks for critique.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add initmahesh/miniPM --skill prd-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

7.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

PRD Review Checklist

Covers 2-pagers and 6-pagers. Mark each item ✅ (Yes) · ⚠️ (Partial) · ❌ (No)

Field
Document Title
Author / Reviewer
Review Date

0. Opening & Framing

Amazon PRFAQ principle: if the opening doesn't land, leadership stops reading. Check this first.

#CheckStatusNotes
0.1Headline / title is a customer benefit statement — not a feature description or internal project name
0.2First paragraph names the customer, the problem, and the transformation delivered — an unfamiliar exec understands why this matters in under 30 seconds
0.3Document is free of buzzwords and hype: "revolutionary", "game-changing", "AI-powered", "next-gen", "paradigm shift"
0.4Narrative is written from the customer's perspective throughout — not the engineer's or the company's

Notes:


1. Problem & Customer

#CheckStatusNotes
1.1Problem is clearly articulated (job-to-be-done) and validated with real customer data or research — not internal assumptions
1.2Problem statement is a pure pain statement — does NOT hint at or imply a solution
1.3Negative impact is quantified: time lost, cost, frequency, or scale of affected users
1.4Customer persona defined with specific roles, industries, and needs; buyer vs. user distinguished if different
1.5Urgency is clear — explains why now and the cost of inaction
1.6Existing alternatives called out as insufficient, with a specific reason why they fall short
1.7MOAT is defined and defensible — data flywheel, workflow lock-in, proprietary training, or switching cost
1.8Solution is differentiated from ChatGPT, copilots, and commodity AI wrappers
1.9Validated demand signal present — customer quotes, paid pilots, waitlists, or demonstrated willingness to pay

Notes:


2. Solution & AI Design

#CheckStatusNotes
2.1Core value proposition is crisp (1–2 sentences) and directly addresses the stated problem
2.2Solution addresses every problem raised in the Problem section — no orphaned pain points left unresolved
2.3Solution is described in benefit language (what the customer experiences) — not feature lists or system architecture
2.4Visual user flow included: input → processing → output
2.5Core functional requirements listed in user story format
2.6Use of Agentic AI / ML / LLMs justified over rule-based or simpler approaches; unstructured data types identified
2.7AI drawbacks addressed: hallucination, attribution accuracy, agent failure modes, and explainability

Notes:


3. Metrics & Success

#CheckStatusNotes
3.1North Star metric defined — the single number that proves the product is working
3.2Primary metric is customer-recognized — something the customer would care about, not an internal proxy
3.3Every primary metric has a baseline (current state value) AND a SMART target (specific, time-bound)
3.4Both leading indicators (early signals you can watch) and lagging indicators (ultimate business outcomes) are present
3.5Secondary metrics included: adoption, time saved, cost reduction, or task completion rate
3.6Anti-metrics / guardrails stated — what should NOT get worse (e.g. false attribution rate, user trust, latency)
3.7Launch criteria clearly defined — what specific thresholds must be met to ship?
3.8Metric ownership and tracking method defined — who owns each metric and how will it be measured?

Notes:


4. Prioritization & Roadmap

#CheckStatusNotes
4.1Agentic workflow broken into components (e.g. ingestion, extraction, summarization) with per-component risk assessment
4.2ML feasibility, data availability, and accuracy expectations specified
4.3Features prioritized by risk, cost, and value; MVP scope narrowed with rationale
4.4Roadmap phases defined: MVP → MVP1 → Launch → Iteration, with feature sets and durations
4.5Roadmap items linked back to priorities and risks

Notes:


5. AI Evaluation & Prompt Strategy

#CheckStatusNotes
5.1AI performance evaluation approach described (datasets, ground truth sources, benchmarking cadence)
5.2Accuracy targets defined relative to a human or rule-based baseline — not just in absolute terms
5.3Prompting strategy described — few-shot, CoT, or conditional prompting where applicable
5.4Plan for prompt iteration and improvement based on user feedback

Notes:


6. Responsible AI

#CheckStatusNotes
6.1Risks assessed across Accountability, Transparency, Fairness, and Reliability
6.2Human-in-the-loop and fallback paths planned
6.3Sensitive use cases identified with mitigation strategies

Notes:


7. Pricing & Business Case

#CheckStatusNotes
7.1Development costs broken down (infra + manpower) and ongoing operational costs listed
7.2Revenue scenarios defined and pricing model selected with rationale
7.3Accuracy vs. cost tradeoffs explained
7.4Directional pricing recommendation included

Notes:


Overall Verdict

Rating⬜ Strong   ⬜ Good — minor gaps   ⬜ Needs Work   ⬜ Not Ready
Top Strengths1. · 2. · 3.
Top Gaps1. · 2. · 3.
Next Step

PRD Review Checklist v3.0 — Reviews Project · Updated 2026-04-01 based on Amazon PRFAQ best practices


✦ Proposed Additions — v2 (2026-04-24)

These items were added based on feedback patterns seen 5+ times across reviewed documents.

| ✦ NEW | Metrics & Success → 3.2 — Does each primary metric include a baseline (current state) and a SMART target? | | | (Added v2 — seen in 5 docs. Example: "When a document scopes the product too narrowly (e.g. "back-office teams in CRE ...") | | ✦ NEW | Problem & Customer → 1.1 — Is the problem backed by at least one concrete data point or direct customer evidence? | | | (Added v2 — seen in 5 docs. Example: "When a document scopes the product too narrowly (e.g. "back-office teams in CRE ...") |


Checklist v2 — pending approval from Mahesh

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 627,801. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.