Claude md starter
Skill Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills/.claude/skills/claude-md-starter
Open-source Claude skills for GEO, AI discoverability, and developer GTM workflows. Built for developer-focused companies that want their documentation to be found, parsed, and cited by AI systems.
npx -y skills add Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills --skill claude-md-starterAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Generates a fully structured, project-specific CLAUDE.md by scanning the repo for signal files (package.json, Makefile, .github/workflows/, .env.example, etc.), inferring stack, commands, architecture, and conventions, then asking at most 3 targeted questions for what cannot be inferred. Use whenever the user says 'create a CLAUDE.md', 'my CLAUDE.md is blank', 'generate project context', 'initialize CLAUDE.md', 'set up Claude context for this repo', 'fill in my CLAUDE.md', or any variation where someone needs their project context documented for Claude. If a CLAUDE.md already exists with content, runs a diff-and-merge flow before writing.
SKILL.md
8.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Claude.md Starter — Project Context Generator
Scans the repo, infers the tech stack and conventions, asks at most 3 targeted questions, and writes a populated CLAUDE.md that gives Claude full project context from session one.
Invocation Triggers
Explicit:
- "create a CLAUDE.md"
- "my CLAUDE.md is blank"
- "generate project context"
- "initialize CLAUDE.md"
- "set up Claude context for this repo"
- "fill in my CLAUDE.md"
- "run the claude-md-starter skill"
Implicit:
- User pastes a near-empty CLAUDE.md and asks Claude to populate it
- User keeps re-explaining the same project context at the start of sessions
Run immediately when triggered — no upfront questions before scanning.
Workflow (6 Nodes)
| Node | Role |
|---|---|
| 1 — Detect | Check if CLAUDE.md exists and measure content length |
| 2 — Scan | Read signal files from the project root (see references/scan-signals.md) |
| 3 — Infer | Draft all sections that can be derived from scanned signals |
| 4 — Grill-me | Ask at most 3 questions for what cannot be inferred |
| 5 — Generate | Write the full CLAUDE.md using the template in references/claude-md-template.md |
| 6 — Validate | Confirm required sections are present and non-placeholder |
Node 1 — Detect
Check for CLAUDE.md at the project root.
If not found: Proceed directly to Node 2.
If found and has ≤ 200 characters: Treat as blank — proceed to Node 2.
If found and has > 200 characters: Run the diff-and-merge flow before writing:
-
Read the existing file
-
Complete Nodes 2–4 to produce the generated version
-
Compare section by section — for each of the 8 required sections, classify as:
- NEW — exists in generated, absent or empty in existing
- ENHANCED — both versions have content; generated version adds more
- SAME — both versions have equivalent content
- CONFLICT — both versions have different non-empty content
-
Present a diff summary table:
Section | Existing | Generated | Action
---------------------|----------|-----------|-------
Project Overview | present | enhanced | +additions available
Tech Stack | absent | new | will add
Commands | present | enhanced | +2 commands found
Architecture | absent | new | will add
Code Conventions | present | same | no change
Testing | absent | new | will add
What NOT To Do | absent | new | will add
Environment Setup | absent | new | will add
-
Offer three options:
- A (Recommended) — Keep existing content + add new and enhanced sections only (safe, additive)
- B — Full replace with generated version
- C — Review each conflicting section individually before writing
-
Write the chosen merge result.
Node 2 — Scan
Read signal files using the catalog in references/scan-signals.md. For each file found, extract the fields it reveals. Missing files are skipped silently.
Run all reads in parallel where possible:
package.json— framework, scripts, package manager, dependenciespyproject.toml/requirements.txt/setup.py— Python stackCargo.toml/go.mod/pom.xml/build.gradle— languageMakefile/justfile— named commands.github/workflows/*.yml— CI/CD steps, deploy targetsDockerfile/docker-compose.yml— runtime environment, services.eslintrc.*/.prettierrc.*/eslint.config.*— JS/TS code styleruff.toml/.flake8/mypy.ini— Python lint/type configjest.config.*/vitest.config.*/pytest.ini/conftest.py— test frameworktsconfig.json— TypeScript settings.env.example/.env.sample— required environment variablesREADME.md(first 40 lines only) — project description- Top-level directory listing — architecture pattern
.gitignore— build artifacts and generated files
Node 3 — Infer
Using scanned data, populate as many sections as possible before asking questions:
- Project Overview → from README.md first paragraph; fall back to
package.jsondescriptionfield - Tech Stack → from language files + framework dependencies
- Commands → from
package.jsonscripts, Makefile targets, workflow run steps - Architecture → from top-level directory structure
- Code Conventions → from eslint/prettier/ruff config values
- Testing → from test config files and test directory location
- What NOT To Do → from
.gitignorebuild outputs, workflow branch protection, lock files - Environment Setup → from
.env.examplevariable names and docker-compose services
Node 4 — Grill-Me Intake
Ask only for what cannot be inferred. Maximum 3 questions. Skip any question whose answer is already clear from scanned files.
Present all applicable questions together in one message — never ask them across multiple turns:
Quick questions to finish your CLAUDE.md (answer whichever apply):
- What does this project do in one sentence? (skip if README was found)
- Are there any files, directories, or systems that should never be touched or auto-modified by Claude?
- Any team conventions not captured in your lint config? (naming patterns, PR size, commit format, review process)
Node 5 — Generate
Produce the CLAUDE.md using the exact section structure from references/claude-md-template.md.
Critical rules:
- Every populated section must have real content — no
[TODO: add your X here]placeholders - If a section cannot be filled at all, omit it entirely rather than writing a placeholder
- Commands must be exact and runnable (
npm run dev, not "run the dev server") - What NOT To Do must have at least 2 entries
- Write in imperative, direct style ("Run tests with...", "Never edit files in...")
- No heading levels deeper than H2 within sections
Node 6 — Validate
Before writing, verify against references/validation-checklist.md:
- All populated sections have real content (no placeholders)
- Commands section has ≥ 2 runnable commands
- What NOT To Do has ≥ 2 entries
- No unreplaced placeholder text remains
- If existing CLAUDE.md had > 200 characters, diff-and-merge flow was completed
If Commands or What NOT To Do would fail: ask one final targeted question before writing.
Output
Write the file to CLAUDE.md at the project root. After writing, print a one-line confirmation:
✓ CLAUDE.md written — X sections populated from repo scan, Y from your answers.
If in diff-and-merge mode, also print which sections were added vs. left unchanged.
Anti-Patterns To Reject
- Generating CLAUDE.md without running the scan first
- Asking more than 3 intake questions
- Writing placeholder sections ("add your commands here")
- Overwriting an existing populated CLAUDE.md without running the diff-and-merge flow
- Writing generic boilerplate not specific to the scanned project
- Including commands that weren't found in signal files and weren't confirmed by the user
References
references/scan-signals.md— full catalog of signal files and what each revealsreferences/claude-md-template.md— canonical CLAUDE.md section structure and style rulesreferences/validation-checklist.md— required fields and quality gates before writing
Version: 1.0.0