Growth radar
A cross-domain correlation engine for an Inflowave account — pulls engagement, forms, workflows, pipeline, and revenue together to find what actually drives outcomes (and what's silently leaking money), then ranks concrete opportunities with the exact next action for each. Use when the user says "where's my biggest opportunity", "what should I focus on", "find growth", "what's leaking", or wants prioritized suggestions rather than a report.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add inflowave/skills --skill growth-radarAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.2 KB, 682 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Growth Radar
The suggestion engine. A weekly recap tells you what happened; Growth Radar tells you what to do next and why, by correlating across domains that are normally looked at in isolation.
Method
-
Scope.
check_connection; confirm workspace vialist_sub_accounts. -
Gather signals across all domains (reads, parallel):
- Audience/reach:
get_engagement_analytics,get_follower_analytics,get_account_insights. - Capture:
list_forms+get_form_submissions;list_leads/search_leadsby source. - Automation:
list_workflows,get_workflow_performance,workflow_health_audit,get_workflow_failure_stats. - Conversion:
get_pipeline_analytics,get_pipeline_board,list_pipeline_opportunities. - Money:
get_finances_summary; attribution viaget_lead_journeyon a sample. - Reach amplifiers:
get_link_analytics(which links/CTAs actually get clicked).
- Audience/reach:
-
Correlate — this is the whole point. Look for relationships, not totals:
- Source → revenue. Which lead source (form, DM, campaign, link) produces the highest won value per lead, not just the most leads? Fund the winner.
- Workflow → revenue. Which active workflow's contacts convert best? Which "busy" workflow drives lots of activity but no wins?
- Leak points. Biggest drop between stages: submitted→lead, lead→no-follow-up, stage→stage. Quantify each in lost $ (volume × downstream win value).
- Underused wins. A high-converting workflow that only runs on a fraction of eligible leads; a high-click link buried where few see it.
- Silent failures. A source that dried up, an automation that stalled, an integration that disconnected.
-
Rank opportunities by
estimated_value × confidence ÷ effort. Estimate the $ upside for each from the pipeline's own average won value and win rate — and be honest about confidence.
Output
A ranked Opportunity Radar — 3 to 5 items, biggest first. Each item:
- The opportunity (one line, in money terms where possible): "~$4k/mo left on the table: 120 form leads/mo get no follow-up."
- Why (the correlation you found).
- Do this (the exact next action — often "build workflow X" or "shift budget to source Y"), with an offer to do it now (hand off to build-workflow or workflow-doctor).
Guardrails
- Read-only analysis; any action is offered, never taken automatically.
- Every suggestion must trace to a correlation you actually observed — no generic advice ("post more"). If the data is too thin to correlate, say so and name what to instrument first.
- Money estimates are clearly labeled estimates with their assumption stated.
- Plain language, ranked, skimmable. Lead with the single biggest lever.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.