Shaktra incident
Skill im-shashanks/claude-plugins/shaktra/skills/shaktra-incident
Market place for custom Claude code plugins
npx -y skills add im-shashanks/claude-plugins --skill shaktra-incidentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Incident Response workflow — post-mortem analysis, operational runbook generation, and detection gap assessment for completed bugfixes. Closes the learning loop from production incident to enhanced quality gates.
SKILL.md
8.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
/shaktra:incident — Incident Response
You orchestrate post-incident analysis for completed bugfixes. Where /shaktra:bugfix answers "what broke and how to fix it," you answer "what do we learn and how do we prevent it." You produce blameless post-mortems, operational runbooks, and detection gap analyses that feed back into the memory system.
Philosophy
Production incidents are the strongest signal about quality gate gaps. A bug that reaches production has already passed every quality gate — plan review, test writing, implementation, quality checks, code review. Understanding why each gate missed it is more valuable than the fix itself. This workflow extracts that understanding and encodes it as organizational knowledge.
Intent Classification
Classify the user's request into one of these intents:
| Intent | Trigger Patterns | Workflow |
|---|---|---|
post_mortem | "post-mortem", "postmortem", "retro", "incident review" + bug/story reference | Full post-mortem analysis |
runbook | "runbook", "playbook", "response procedure" + bug/story reference | Operational runbook generation |
detection_gap | "detection gap", "why didn't we catch", "quality gap" + bug/story reference | Detection gap analysis |
If ambiguous, ask the user to specify which analysis they need.
Post-Mortem Workflow
1. Read Project Context
Before any analysis:
- Read
.shaktra/settings.yml— if missing, inform user to run/shaktra:initand stop - Read
.shaktra/memory/principles.yml(if exists) - Read
.shaktra/memory/anti-patterns.yml(if exists) - Read
.shaktra/memory/procedures.yml(if exists) - Determine memory retrieval tier:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/memory_retrieval.py <story_dir> <settings_path> - Generate briefing per retrieval tier (see
retrieval-guide.md):- Tier 1: Generate inline following the retrieval algorithm
- Tier 2: Spawn memory-retriever (briefing mode) using dispatch template
- Tier 3: Spawn parallel chunk retrievers + consolidation retriever using dispatch templates
2. Load Incident Context
Extract the bug ID from the user's request (e.g., BUG-001, ST-001).
Locate and read:
- Diagnosis artifact:
.shaktra/stories/diagnosis-{bug_id}.yml - Story YAML:
.shaktra/stories/{story_id}.yml(story ID from diagnosis) - Handoff:
.shaktra/stories/{story_id}/handoff.yml
If diagnosis artifact is missing:
- Emit
INCIDENT_CONTEXT_MISSING - Inform user: "No diagnosis artifact found for {bug_id}. Run
/shaktra:bugfixfirst to create a diagnosis, then return here for post-incident analysis." - Stop execution.
3. Create Observations File
Create the incident output directory and observations file:
- Create
.shaktra/incidents/{bug_id}/directory - Create empty
.shaktra/incidents/{bug_id}/.observations.yml
4. Dispatch Incident Analyst
Spawn the shaktra-incident-analyst agent:
You are the shaktra-incident-analyst agent. Perform post-mortem analysis for this incident.
Intent: post_mortem
Diagnosis: {diagnosis_path}
Story: {story_path}
Handoff: {handoff_path}
Briefing: {briefing_path}
Settings: {settings_path}
Follow postmortem-methodology.md for the 5-step analysis. Write artifacts to .shaktra/incidents/{bug_id}/ following incident-schema.md. Write observations to .observations.yml.
5. Handle Result & Memory Capture
On completion:
- Read the post-mortem artifact
- If
settings.incident.auto_detection_gapproduced a detection gap artifact, read it - If
settings.incident.runbook_auto_generateproduced a runbook, read it - Emit
INCIDENT_ANALYSIS_COMPLETE - If detection gaps were found, also emit
INCIDENT_DETECTION_GAPS_FOUND
Memory capture — Mandatory final step. Spawn shaktra-memory-curator:
You are the shaktra-memory-curator agent. Consolidate observations from the completed workflow.
Story path: .shaktra/incidents/{bug_id}
Workflow type: incident
Settings: {settings_path}
Read .observations.yml from the incident directory. Follow consolidation-guide.md:
classify observations, match against existing entries, apply confidence math
(with incident confidence multiplier), detect anti-patterns and procedures,
archive below threshold. Write updated principles.yml, anti-patterns.yml, procedures.yml.
Set memory_captured: true in the observations file.
Emit INCIDENT_MEMORY_CAPTURED.
Runbook Workflow
1. Read Project Context
Same as post-mortem step 1.
2. Load Incident Context
Same as post-mortem step 2. Same INCIDENT_CONTEXT_MISSING guard.
3. Create Observations File
Same as post-mortem step 3.
4. Dispatch Incident Analyst
Spawn with intent: runbook:
You are the shaktra-incident-analyst agent. Generate an operational runbook for this incident.
Intent: runbook
Diagnosis: {diagnosis_path}
Story: {story_path}
Handoff: {handoff_path}
Briefing: {briefing_path}
Settings: {settings_path}
Follow runbook-template.md for section structure. Write artifacts to .shaktra/incidents/{bug_id}/ following incident-schema.md.
5. Handle Result & Memory Capture
Same pattern as post-mortem step 5.
Detection Gap Workflow
1. Read Project Context
Same as post-mortem step 1.
2. Load Incident Context
Same as post-mortem step 2. Same INCIDENT_CONTEXT_MISSING guard.
3. Create Observations File
Same as post-mortem step 3.
4. Dispatch Incident Analyst
Spawn with intent: detection_gap:
You are the shaktra-incident-analyst agent. Analyze detection gaps for this incident.
Intent: detection_gap
Diagnosis: {diagnosis_path}
Story: {story_path}
Handoff: {handoff_path}
Briefing: {briefing_path}
Settings: {settings_path}
Follow detection-gap-framework.md for the 4-step analysis. Write artifacts to .shaktra/incidents/{bug_id}/ following incident-schema.md.
5. Handle Result & Memory Capture
Same pattern as post-mortem step 5. Emit INCIDENT_DETECTION_GAPS_FOUND if gaps were identified.
Agent Dispatch Reference
| Agent | Intent | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| shaktra-incident-analyst | post_mortem | Timeline, root cause chain, impact, gaps, action items |
| shaktra-incident-analyst | runbook | Operational runbook from diagnosis data |
| shaktra-incident-analyst | detection_gap | Quality gate coverage matrix, test gaps, recommendations |
| shaktra-memory-curator | All | Consolidate incident observations into long-term memory |
| shaktra-memory-retriever | All | Tiered briefing generation (if Tier 2/3) |
Completion Report
## Incident Analysis: {bug_id}
**Intent:** {post_mortem | runbook | detection_gap}
**Story:** {story_id} — {story_title}
**Root Cause:** {RC category} — {one_sentence_explanation}
### Artifacts Generated
- Post-mortem: {path or "N/A"}
- Runbook: {path or "N/A"}
- Detection gap: {path or "N/A"}
### Key Findings
- Timeline: {time_to_detection} to detect, {time_to_resolution} to resolve
- Contributing factors: {count}
- Detection gaps: {count} gates with gaps
- Action items: {count} (P0: {n}, P1: {n}, P2: {n}, P3: {n})
### Action Items Summary
{table: ID | Category | Priority | Description — or "None"}
### Next Step
- Create stories for action items: `/shaktra:tpm` with action item descriptions
- Review detection gaps with team to improve quality gate coverage
- Store runbook in team documentation for future incident response
- Memory captured: {yes/no}
Sub-Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
postmortem-methodology.md | 5-step post-mortem process — timeline, root cause chain, impact, gaps, action items |
runbook-template.md | Operational runbook structure — identification, severity, response, diagnosis, resolution, verification |
detection-gap-framework.md | Gap analysis process — gate coverage matrix, test gaps, quality dimensions, recommendations |
incident-schema.md | YAML schemas for post-mortem, runbook, and detection gap artifacts |
References
shaktra-reference/severity-taxonomy.md— P0-P3 severity definitionsshaktra-quality— 13 quality dimensions for detection gap analysisshaktra-memory/consolidation-guide.md— Memory consolidation with incident confidence multiplier
Guard Tokens
| Token | When |
|---|---|
INCIDENT_CONTEXT_MISSING | No diagnosis artifact found — user must run /shaktra:bugfix first |
INCIDENT_ANALYSIS_COMPLETE | Analysis finished, artifacts written |
INCIDENT_DETECTION_GAPS_FOUND | Detection gap analysis identified quality gate gaps |
INCIDENT_MEMORY_CAPTURED | Observations consolidated into long-term memory |