Testing

BDD-Style Unit Test Rules

1. BDD Style Required

• Always use BDD style (Describe - Context - It)
• Use English naming for test blocks with Korean descriptions

2. Naming Conventions

Block	Pattern	Example
describe (class)	{ClassName} 클래스의	AuthFacade 클래스의
describe (method)	{methodName}() 메서드는	login() 메서드는
context	~하면, ~이면	유효한 토큰이 주어지면
it	~한다, ~반환한다	사용자 정보를 반환한다

---

3. Qualities of a Good Unit Test

Every test must satisfy all five criteria:

• Accurate damage detection: Tests MUST fail when code is broken. A passing test must provide confidence that the code works correctly
• Implementation-independent: Tests MUST still pass after refactoring internals. Test the public API behavior, not implementation details
• Well-explained failure: Failure messages alone must be sufficient to identify the problem
• Readable test code: Tests serve as documentation. Other developers must understand the intent immediately
• Fast execution: Unit tests must complete quickly since they are run frequently

---

4. Test Behaviors, Not Functions

• ❌ Do NOT mechanically create one test case per function
• ✅ Write separate test cases for each behavior a function performs
• A single function may exhibit different behaviors under different conditions — test each behavior individually
• NEVER skip error scenarios — test invalid inputs, boundary values, and exception cases alongside happy paths

---

5. Test One Behavior at a Time

• Testing multiple behaviors in a single test case makes failure diagnosis difficult
• ❌ Bundling multiple behaviors into one test
• ✅ Each test case verifies exactly one behavior independently
• Test case names must clearly describe the specific behavior being verified

---

6. Test Through Public APIs

• NEVER change private functions to public just for testing
• Test private function behavior indirectly through the public API
• Directly testing private functions couples tests to implementation — refactoring breaks tests even when behavior is unchanged
• If code is too complex to test through its public API, consider splitting it into smaller units

---

7. Test Double Guidelines

Mock and Stub

• Mocks and stubs simplify tests by replacing real dependencies, but risk coupling to implementation details
• Tests using mocks/stubs may break during refactoring even when behavior is unchanged

Fake

• Fakes are simplified implementations of real dependencies, providing more realistic tests than mocks/stubs
• Fakes decouple tests from implementation details
• Trade-off: fakes require their own maintenance

Selection Criteria

Situation	Recommended
Isolating from external systems (DB, API)	Fake or mock
Only need to control return values	Stub
Need to verify call count/args/order	Mock
Real dependency is lightweight and side-effect-free	Use the real dependency

---

8. Shared Fixture Usage

• State sharing (BeforeAll): Runs once before all test cases. Suitable for expensive dependencies, but shared mutable state between test cases can cause problems
• Config sharing (BeforeEach): Runs before each test case. Guarantees isolation between test cases
• Mutable state MUST be reset via BeforeEach — sharing mutable state between test cases causes flaky tests
• Important setup values must be visible within each test case — hiding them in shared fixtures obscures test intent
• Shared constants are acceptable, but critical input values must be explicit in each test case

---

9. Use Appropriate Assertion Matchers

• Failure messages alone must be sufficient to diagnose the issue
• ❌ Poor assertion: failure shows only Expected: true, But was: false — no context
• ✅ Good assertion: failure clearly shows the difference between expected and actual values
• For collection assertions where order doesn't matter, use flexible matchers like containsExactlyInAnyOrder
• Leverage framework-provided matchers (e.g., AssertJ containsAtLeast, Jasmine arrayContaining)

---

10. Use Dependency Injection for Testability

• Hard-coded dependencies can make testing impossible
• Constructor injection allows replacing dependencies with fakes or mocks during tests
• Dependency injection improves not only testability but also modularity and flexibility
• Combine static factory methods with constructor injection to maintain both production convenience and testability

11. Anti-Patterns

• Deploying Without Tests: Deploying to production without test coverage is risky. At minimum, test core business logic
• Testing Implementation Details: Tests coupled to internal implementation break on refactoring. Write behavior-based tests
• Inter-test Dependencies: Tests that depend on execution order create unstable test suites. Each test must be independent
• Excessive Mocking: Mocking all dependencies diverges from real behavior. Supplement with integration tests
• Magic Numbers: Using meaningless numbers/strings in test data. Use intention-revealing constants or factories
• Ignoring Flaky Tests: Tolerating intermittently failing tests erodes overall test suite reliability. Fix or quarantine immediately

Additional References

• For integration testing patterns, see references/integration.md
• For contract testing patterns, see references/contract.md
• For performance testing strategies, see references/performance.md
• For E2E testing patterns (Playwright, Cypress, visual regression), see references/e2e.md

Related Skills

• For load testing with k6 and Gatling, see load-testing skill