Infra kit.workflow.research
Skill huyngopt1994/infras-kit/infras-kit-plugin/skills/infra-kit.workflow.research
Infras Kit Provide a Kit For All Infras Working
npx -y skills add huyngopt1994/infras-kit --skill infra-kit.workflow.researchAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Research infrastructure topics with source quality, version awareness, and actionable recommendations backed by citations.
SKILL.md
2.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Infrastructure Research
Use this skill when the user asks for recommendations that depend on external documentation or evolving ecosystems: cloud features, Kubernetes APIs, Gateway/Ingress behaviors, Terraform provider attributes, security controls, or industry practices.
The output should be a short, cited research brief plus an experiment/validation plan.
Output Rules
- Always write deliverables to one or more Markdown files in the repo (do not only respond in chat).
- If the research is large, split it into multiple files (e.g.,
00-context.md,01-options.md,02-recommendation.md,03-validation-plan.md). - Prefer a stable location such as
docs/infra-research/<topic>/.
Outcomes
- Produce a recommendation with explicit trade-offs and constraints
- Cite primary sources (vendor docs, upstream project docs, RFC/KEP) and record versions/dates
- Identify what is unknown and propose the smallest test to answer it
Where This Fits In The Flow
- Use when the right decision depends on versions, vendor defaults, quotas, or subtle behavior.
- Use to de-risk
infra-kit.workflowplanning by producing a cited recommendation plus a validation plan.
Workflow
- Clarify the research question:
- what decision will this inform
- what environment (cloud, region, k8s distro, versions)
- Identify constraints and evaluation criteria.
- Gather sources (prefer in this order):
- official vendor documentation
- upstream project docs / release notes
- standards (RFCs) / Kubernetes KEPs when relevant
- high-quality third-party writeups only for context, not as authority
- Extract facts:
- version-specific behavior
- limits/quotas
- security implications
- operational impacts
- Compare options and produce a recommendation.
- Provide a validation plan:
- how to test (PoC steps)
- what success looks like
- what would falsify the recommendation
Source Quality Rules
- Prefer sources that match the user's version and provider.
- Always include links and (when available) the doc version or last-updated date.
- If sources conflict, say so and propose how to resolve (test, issue tracker, release notes).
Hallucination Guardrails
- Do not guess provider/resource arguments or defaults; cite docs.
- Do not present third-party blog content as official behavior.
- If sources cannot be fetched, say so and limit output to what is known.
Research Brief Format
- Question:
- Context (versions, environment):
- Recommendation:
- Key evidence (links):
- Trade-offs:
- Risks:
- Validation plan:
- Open questions: