Statistical reporting
Skill huguryildiz/ALETHEIA/skills/extended/statistical-reporting
Use when a numeric result is about to be reported, compared, or put in a paper — enforcing replication counts, uncertainty intervals, paired comparisons on matched instances, and visible denominators. Also use when designing how many runs a claim needs. Trigger phrases: "is this difference real", "how many replications", "report with confidence intervals", "single run result", "compare method A vs B", "is N=3 enough".From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add huguryildiz/ALETHEIA --skill statistical-reportingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.8 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
statistical-reporting
Never report a single run as a result. A number from one draw of a stochastic system is an anecdote; a claim is a distribution summarized honestly: center, spread, replication count, and — for comparisons — a paired design with the pairing stated. This skill governs how numbers become claims.
When to use
- A numeric result is entering a build-log entry, a decision's evidence, or a paper draft.
- Designing a campaign: choosing the replication unit and count before launch.
- Comparing methods, configurations, or arms.
- Reviewing a draft for naked point estimates.
When NOT to use
- Deterministic quantities (an exact count, a closed-form value, a proven bound) — report the value; intervals around determinism are theater.
- Exploratory probes not yet feeding a claim — but promote them through this skill before they do.
- Choosing seeds/realization mechanics —
run-provenance.
Runbook
- Declare the replication unit before running — what varies across replications (random instances, seeds, data splits, noise draws) and what stays fixed. The unit defines what population the claim generalizes to.
- Set N in the run contract, not after seeing results. Working default: ~10 realizations per cell for expensive computations, more when cheap; the honest minimum is whatever supports the interval you intend to report.
- Run paired where comparing. All arms see the same realization list (same instances, same seeds); report per-realization differences, not differences of aggregates.
- Summarize with center + spread + N: median (or mean) with an interquartile band / bootstrap CI / standard error — and N visible in every table and caption. For small N or unknown distributions prefer rank-based tests (e.g. paired signed-rank) over normality assumptions.
- Keep denominators visible. Failed, infeasible, and timed-out cells are part of the
result: "median over the 6/10 realizations that completed; 4 infeasible (recorded)" — never
silently condition on success (
evidence-conventionrule 5). - Report direction, magnitude, and uncertainty — not a bare p-value. A significant difference of negligible size and a non-significant trend are both reportable truths; say which you have.
Rules
- One run, no claim. A single-realization number may appear only as a labeled illustration ("representative realization"), never as the result.
- The comparison set is declared in advance (the run contract /
expectationfield — seeevidence-convention). Comparisons invented after seeing the numbers are labeled post-hoc and carry no confirmatory weight. - No selective replication. Adding realizations until the test passes, or dropping "unlucky" seeds, is p-hacking with extra steps; N is fixed by the contract, deviations are recorded.
- Match before you compare. Arms differing in more than the treatment (different instances, different budgets) produce differences with no interpretation; matching is a design property, not a statistical patch.
- Uncertainty from the right variance. Spread across realizations ≠ spread within one realization's iterates; state which is shown.
- Small-N humility. With N ≤ 5, report the raw per-realization table alongside any summary — readers can then judge for themselves.
Configuration
{{evidence_dir}}— campaign outputs and per-realization tables.
Provenance & maintenance
Authored from the statistical-reporting canon for computational experiments (replication,
pairing, visible denominators, rank-based small-N tests), grounded in working practice: a
campaign design of ~10 realizations per cell with paired rank-based comparison across arms
on identical realization lists, infeasible cells recorded verbatim as findings, and
per-realization difference tables computed post-hoc from the evidence CSVs. See the pack's
examples/ directory for the worked exemplar mapping.
Re-verify in your project:
grep -h "seeds\|realizations" {{evidence_dir}}/*/meta.json | head -3— N is declared in the contract, not improvised.- Spot-check a recent table/caption for center + spread + N all present.
grep -rn "INFEASIBLE\|TIMEOUT\|failed" {{evidence_dir}}/*/README.md | head— denominators are recorded, not conditioned away (adapt status names).
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.