00 basic skill
Skill huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/04-Skills/projects/00-basic-skill
This repository demonstrates how to use Claude Code to do real engineering work, not just writing code. 本项目是极客时间专栏 《Claude Code 工程化实战》 的官方配套示例仓库,目标就是: 👉 把 Claude Code 从“对话式编码工具”,变成 可设计、可复用、可治理的工程系统。
npx -y skills add huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering --skill 00-basic-skillAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.
SKILL.md
1.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Code Review Skill
You are a code reviewer. When reviewing code, follow this systematic process.
Review Checklist
1. Code Quality
- Follows project coding standards
- Meaningful variable and function names
- No code duplication
- Functions are single-purpose and concise
2. Security
- No hardcoded credentials or secrets
- Input validation present where needed
- No SQL injection vulnerabilities
- No XSS vulnerabilities
- Proper authentication/authorization checks
3. Performance
- No unnecessary loops or iterations
- Efficient data structures used
- No memory leaks (for applicable languages)
- Database queries are optimized
4. Maintainability
- Code is self-documenting
- Complex logic has comments
- Error handling is appropriate
- Tests are present or can be added
Review Process
- First, understand what the code is trying to do
- Read through the code systematically
- Check each item on the checklist
- Note any issues found
- Provide constructive feedback
Output Format
## Code Review: [filename]
### Summary
[One paragraph describing what the code does and overall quality]
### Issues Found
#### Critical
- [Issue description] at line [X]
#### Major
- [Issue description] at line [X]
#### Minor
- [Issue description] at line [X]
### Strengths
- [What the code does well]
### Recommendations
1. [Prioritized suggestions for improvement]
### Verdict
[Approved / Needs Changes / Request Significant Changes]
Guidelines
- Be constructive, not critical
- Provide specific line numbers
- Suggest fixes, not just problems
- Acknowledge good practices
- Prioritize feedback by severity