Differential splicing statistical testing
Curated, evidence-grounded skill and software-tool collections for scientific AI agents, generated by the AgenticScienceBuilder
npx -y skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill differential-splicing-statistical-testingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 14 stars14 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when you have PSI (percent-spliced-in) matrices for multiple samples grouped into two or more biological conditions, along with corresponding transcript expression quantification, and need to identify events or transcripts with statistically significant changes in inclusion levels between.
The file declares its own license as CC-BY-4.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.3 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
differential-splicing-statistical-testing
Summary
Statistical testing of differential splicing across multiple conditions by computing per-event ΔPSI (delta percent-spliced-in) values and their significance from PSI matrices and transcript expression data. This skill quantifies the magnitude and statistical significance of splicing changes between biological conditions using uncertainty-aware methods.
When to use
Use this skill when you have PSI (percent-spliced-in) matrices for multiple samples grouped into two or more biological conditions, along with corresponding transcript expression quantification, and need to identify events or transcripts with statistically significant changes in inclusion levels between conditions with replicates (≥2 replicates per condition).
When NOT to use
- Input samples lack clear biological replicates (≥2 per condition required for uncertainty estimation)
- PSI matrices already contain pre-computed differential statistics rather than raw per-sample values
- Study design involves only single time points or unpaired samples without condition grouping
Inputs
- PSI matrix files (per-condition, event-level or isoform-level)
- Transcript expression quantification files (TPM, counts, or abundance estimates)
- Condition grouping specification (sample-to-condition assignments)
Outputs
- Differential splicing results table with event/transcript identifiers, ΔPSI values, and p-values
- Per-sample PSI vectors (.psivec file format)
How to apply
Load PSI matrix files for each condition and corresponding transcript expression quantification files. Align samples across conditions and normalize expression values if needed. Apply the SUPPA2 diffSplice statistical test to compute per-event ΔPSI between conditions, comparing the observed ΔPSI with the distribution of ΔPSI between replicates as a function of transcript expression. Calculate p-values for each event using the uncertainty-aware method; for studies with >10 replicates per condition, classical statistical tests (e.g., Wilcoxon) can be used instead. Compile results into a differential splicing table containing event identifiers, ΔPSI values, and statistical significance metrics for downstream interpretation.
Related tools
- SUPPA2 (implements diffSplice subcommand for computing differential splicing statistics with uncertainty-aware p-values from PSI matrices and expression data) — https://github.com/comprna/SUPPA
Examples
python3.4 suppa.py diffSplice -m PSI -i condition1_PSI.psi condition2_PSI.psi -e condition1_expression.txt condition2_expression.txt -o differential_splicing_results
Evaluation signals
- ΔPSI values fall within the expected range [−1.0, 1.0] for all events tested
- P-values are properly calibrated (no p-value = 0; uniform distribution under null hypothesis)
- Events with large |ΔPSI| (e.g., >0.3) corresponding to small p-values; low |ΔPSI| events have non-significant p-values
- Significance distribution differs between replicates (internal noise floor) and between-condition comparisons
- Results include all events present in input annotation; no expected events missing from output table
Limitations
- Requires minimum of 2 replicates per condition to estimate uncertainty; power increases with more replicates
- Relies on accurate upstream PSI quantification—errors in transcript expression or event definition propagate to statistical results
- Method assumes PSI values and expression data are properly normalized; batch effects or library size differences must be corrected beforehand
- Classical statistical tests (Wilcoxon) are only recommended when >10 replicates per condition; smaller sample sizes rely on uncertainty-aware method
- Complex splicing patterns not captured by simple local events may be missed when using ioe (local events) rather than ioi (transcript isoforms)
Evidence
- [readme] Statistical significance is calculated by comparing the observed ΔPSI between conditions with the distribution of the ΔPSI between replicates as a function of the expression of the transcripts defining the events: "Statistical significance is calculated by comparing the observed ΔPSI between conditions with the distribution of the ΔPSI between replicates as a function of the expression of the transcripts"
- [other] SUPPA2 performs fast, accurate, and uncertainty-aware differential splicing analysis across multiple conditions by consuming PSI matrices and expression data to generate differential splicing results: "SUPPA2 performs fast, accurate, and uncertainty-aware differential splicing analysis across multiple conditions"
- [other] Apply the SUPPA2 diffSplice statistical test to compute per-event ΔPSI (difference in percent-spliced-in) between conditions. Calculate p-values for each event using the uncertainty-aware method: "Apply the SUPPA2 diffSplice statistical test to compute per-event ΔPSI (difference in percent-spliced-in) between conditions. Calculate p-values for each event using the uncertainty-aware method"
- [readme] When there is a large (>10) number of replicates per condition, you can also run SUPPA with a classical statistical test (Wilcoxon) per local event or per transcript: "When there is a large (>10) number of replicates per condition, you can also run SUPPA with a classical statistical test (Wilcoxon)"
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.