Saas valuation compression
Skill himself65/finance-skills/plugins/market-analysis/skills/saas-valuation-compression
A collection of skills for AI financial analysis.
npx -y skills add himself65/finance-skills --skill saas-valuation-compressionAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Analyze SaaS company valuation compression between funding rounds. Use this skill whenever the user asks about: how much a SaaS company's valuation multiple changed between rounds, why the ARR multiple compressed or expanded, comparing a company's compression to macro benchmarks, or explaining what drove valuation changes for any VC-backed software company. Trigger on phrases like "valuation compression", "ARR multiple", "round-to-round valuation", "multiple change", or when the user asks to compare a company's funding rounds. Always use this skill for any multi-round SaaS valuation analysis — do not try to answer from memory alone.
SKILL.md
9.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
SaaS Valuation Compression Analyzer
What This Skill Does
For a given SaaS company, research its funding history and compute ARR-based valuation multiples at each round. Then explain the compression (or expansion) using a structured framework that covers macro rates, growth trajectory, narrative shifts, and comparables.
Always render the output as an inline visualization (using the Visualizer tool) plus a concise prose explanation. Do not just return a wall of numbers.
Step-by-Step Workflow
1. Gather Data via Web Search
Search for each of the following. Run searches in parallel where possible.
For the target company:
[company] funding rounds valuation ARR revenue[company] Series [X] raised valuationfor each round[company] annual recurring revenue ARR [year]for each round date[company] investors lead investor [round]
For macro context:
SaaS ARR valuation multiples [year] private market- Use the known benchmark table below as fallback if search is thin.
For narrative context:
[company] AI customers product announcement [year]— AI narrative premium?[company] growth rate churn NRR [year]— fundamentals shift?
2. Build the Data Model
For each funding round, extract or estimate:
| Field | How to get it |
|---|---|
| Round name | Direct from search |
| Date | Direct from search |
| Amount raised | Direct from search |
| Post-money valuation | Direct or compute from ownership %; if unavailable, note as estimated |
| ARR at round date | Search explicitly; if not found, estimate from customer count x ARPC or interpolate |
| ARR multiple | valuation / ARR |
| Lead investor | Direct |
ARR estimation heuristics (when not public):
- Seed/Series A: ARR often $500K–$3M
- Series B: typically $5M–$20M
- Series C: typically $20M–$60M
- Cross-check against customer count x average deal size if available
3. Compute Compression Metrics
For each consecutive round pair (e.g., B → C):
multiple_compression_pct = (later_multiple - earlier_multiple) / earlier_multiple × 100
valuation_growth_pct = (later_val - earlier_val) / earlier_val × 100
arr_growth_pct = (later_arr - earlier_arr) / earlier_arr × 100
Key insight: valuation_growth = arr_growth + multiple_change
If ARR grows faster than the multiple compresses, absolute valuation still rises.
4. Attribute Compression to Causes
Use this checklist. For each cause, rate it: Primary / Contributing / Not applicable.
Macro / Rate Environment
- Was the earlier round during 2020–2021 ZIRP bubble? (adds ~2–5x artificial premium)
- Was the later round during 2022–2023 rate hikes? (removes bubble premium)
- Was the later round during or after the April 2026 Software Meltdown? (public SaaS down 40–86% from 52w highs; tariff/trade-war driven selloff crushed multiples sector-wide — even high-growth names like Figma -87%, monday.com -80%, HubSpot -70%, ServiceNow -58%)
- Reference: SaaS private market median multiples by period:
| Period | Approx Median ARR Multiple (private) | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | ~8–12x | Pre-pandemic baseline |
| 2020 | ~12–18x | ZIRP begins, multiple expansion |
| 2021 Q1–Q3 peak | ~35–45x | Peak bubble |
| 2022 H2 | ~15–20x | Rate hikes begin, first compression wave |
| 2023 trough | ~8–12x | Rate plateau, valuation reset |
| 2024 | ~12–18x | AI narrative recovery, selective re-rating |
| 2025 H1 | ~16–22x | Continued AI-driven recovery |
| 2025 H2–2026 Q1 | ~10–16x | Tariff shock / trade-war selloff begins |
| 2026 Q2 (Apr meltdown) | ~6–10x | Software Meltdown — broad sector crash, public SaaS down 40–86% from 52w highs |
(These are rough private market estimates. Public SaaS multiples are ~30–50% lower. The April 2026 figures reflect the acute selloff; private marks typically lag public by 1–2 quarters.)
Growth Deceleration
- Did YoY ARR growth rate slow materially between rounds? (most common cause)
- Did NRR/net retention drop?
Narrative Shift
- Did the company lose a major product story (e.g., lost PLG thesis, missed category leadership)?
- Did competitors emerge or incumbents catch up?
AI Premium (positive or negative)
- Does the company serve AI-native companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) as customers? → premium
- Did the company pivot to AI narrative credibly? → premium
- Did the company fail to articulate AI story? → discount vs peers
- Note: In the Apr 2026 meltdown, even strong AI narratives did not protect multiples — Snowflake (-53%), Datadog (-46%), MongoDB (-48%) all cratered despite AI tailwinds. AI premium may be necessary but not sufficient in a macro-driven selloff.
Competitive / Market
- Market saturation signal (e.g., Okta pressure on WorkOS, Auth0 competition)
- Customer concentration risk revealed
Investor Supply / Demand
- Was the later round smaller and more selective? → price discipline
- New tier of lead investor (e.g., Tier 1 growth fund vs seed fund)? → may signal higher or lower conviction
5. Build the Visualization
Use the Visualizer tool to render:
- Metric cards row — valuation at each round, ARR at each round, multiple at each round, compression %
- Line chart — ARR multiple over time for the company vs macro SaaS median
- Bar chart — valuation growth vs ARR growth vs multiple change (decomposition)
- Comparison bar — company compression vs 2–3 peer comparables (Vercel, Netlify, Fastly, or sector peers)
- Cause attribution table inline in prose (Primary / Contributing / N/A per factor)
See design guidance: use teal for positive/growth, coral for compression/negative, gray for macro baseline, blue for valuation figures. Follow the CSS variable system throughout.
6. Write the Prose Summary
Structure as:
- One-sentence verdict — e.g., "Multiple compressed 36% but ARR grew 5x, so absolute valuation rose 3.8x."
- Primary cause — the #1 factor explaining compression
- Narrative premium/discount — AI story, category leadership, or lack thereof
- Comparable context — how does this company's compression compare to peers?
- Forward implication — what would need to be true for the multiple to expand at next round?
Output Format
Always produce:
- Inline visualization (Visualizer tool) — comes first
- Prose summary (5–8 sentences) — follows the visualization
- Optional: flag data confidence level if ARR had to be estimated
Known Benchmarks & Comparables (pre-loaded)
Use these as context when search results are thin or for the comparison chart.
| Company | Round pair | Earlier multiple | Later multiple | Compression % | Primary cause |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vercel | D → E (2021→2024) | ~140x | ~32x | -77% | ZIRP unwind + growth decel |
| WorkOS | B → C (2022→2026) | ~105x | ~67x | -36% | Partial ZIRP unwind; defended by AI narrative |
| Netlify | B → stalled (2021→?) | ~90x | N/A | N/A | No new round; AI narrative absent |
| Fastly | Public (2021 peak→2024) | ~35x rev | ~3x rev | -91% | No AI pivot, growth decel |
| Stripe | — | — | — | — | Private; est. flat/compressed 2021→2023 down round |
| HashiCorp | Acquired by IBM 2024 | — | — | — | Acq at ~8x ARR vs ~40x peak |
April 2026 Software Meltdown — Public SaaS Drawdowns
As of April 9, 2026, a broad tariff/trade-war driven selloff crushed public software valuations. Use these as reference for how private multiples will lag-compress over the following 1–2 quarters.
| Ticker | Company | Δ from 52w High | Sector relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIG | Figma | -86.7% | Design/dev tools — worst hit |
| MNDY | monday.com | -80.2% | Work management SaaS |
| TEAM | Atlassian | -75.7% | Dev tools / collaboration |
| HUBS | HubSpot | -69.9% | Marketing/CRM SaaS |
| WIX | WIX | -65.1% | Website builder |
| GTLB | GitLab | -63.6% | DevOps |
| CVLT | Commvault | -61.7% | Data protection |
| WDAY | Workday | -59.1% | HR/Finance SaaS |
| NOW | ServiceNow | -57.8% | Enterprise IT workflows |
| INTU | Intuit | -56.0% | FinTech/SMB SaaS |
| SNOW | Snowflake | -52.8% | Data cloud |
| KVYO | Klaviyo | -52.9% | Marketing automation |
| DOCU | DocuSign | -52.3% | eSignature |
| MDB | MongoDB | -47.9% | Database |
| SAP | SAP | -47.6% | Enterprise ERP |
| DDOG | Datadog | -45.7% | Observability |
| APP | AppLovin | -47.6% | AdTech/mobile |
| CRM | Salesforce | -42.5% | CRM market leader |
| ADBE | Adobe | -34.6% | Creative/doc SaaS |
| ZM | Zoom | -13.9% | Video/collab (already de-rated) |
Source: @speculator_io, April 9, 2026. Average drawdown across tracked software names: ~50–55%.
Edge Cases
- Down round: Multiple and absolute valuation both dropped. Note dilution implications.
- No public ARR: Use customer count x estimated ARPC, and label as estimate with +/- range.
- Single round only: Compute multiple vs sector median for that date; can't do compression analysis. Explain this.
- Pre-revenue: Use forward ARR or GMV multiple if applicable; note the different basis.
- Acqui-hire / strategic acquisition: Acquisition price often reflects strategic premium or distress, not pure ARR multiple — flag this.