Prosperity research session
Skill hgfjh/Agentic-IMC-Prosperity-4/.agents/skills/prosperity-research-session
Use when task is to run or resume an iterative IMC Prosperity research loop: generate or refine hypotheses, check prior attempts, evaluate candidate signals or portfolio ideas, compare against baselines, and produce a patch plan or ranked next steps. Trigger for non-trivial research, backtesting, diversification analysis, or "what should we try next?" questions. Do not trigger for tiny local code edits that do not require research or evaluation.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add hgfjh/Agentic-IMC-Prosperity-4 --skill prosperity-research-sessionAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
6.5 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Use this skill to run a durable research session for IMC Prosperity work.
Public-release note: this skill is the workflow glue for the repo. It tells an agent how to use the local MCP server, how to recover from long-running work, and how to avoid mistaking stale or cached evidence for fresh research.
Core behavior:
- Treat invocation of this skill as an explicit request to use subagents for non-trivial work.
- For non-trivial tasks, spawn bounded subagents early for parallel exploration, review, or verification.
- Keep final synthesis and implementation decisions in main thread.
- Use
prosperityResearchMCP server as primary interface for session orchestration when available. - If MCP server is not configured yet, fall back to
python scripts/prosperity_research_cli.py .... - If skill discovery misses this repo-local skill, use this file at
.agents/skills/prosperity-research-session/SKILL.mddirectly and note that user-level install may still be needed.
When this skill is active:
- Smoke MCP with
tools/listorprosperityResearch.start_or_resume_session; verify a session manifest exists before using CLI fallback. - Inspect current frontier with
prosperityResearch.get_session_statusandprosperityResearch.get_top_candidates. - Before long alpha work, read
prosperityResearch://alpha_autoresearch_protocol; use it as source of truth for OOS splits, keep/discard policy, lane policy, and continuous agent budget loop. - If frontier is weak or stale, continue loop with
prosperityResearch.continue_sessionorprosperityResearch.run_alpha_autoresearch_loop. - For alpha autoresearch, pass explicit budget controls:
iteration_runtime_msmax_total_runtime_secondsstale_operation_timeout_secondsresponse_mode: "compact"or"artifact_only"for long sweeps
- MCP auto-detaches
continue_sessionandrun_alpha_autoresearch_loopwhendetachis omitted. Poll withprosperityResearch.get_compact_session_statusorprosperityResearch.get_session_status; inspectactive_operation,output_path,cancel_path, and artifact links before relaunching. - For ROUND_3/ROUND_4, replay concrete generated candidate labels only. Do not spend research budget replaying current
algorithm.pyas implicit fallback. - If there is a strong candidate, request a patch plan with
prosperityResearch.request_patch_plan. - Summarize:
- what was tried
- what looks promising
- what was rejected
- what should be implemented next
- what should be verified before implementation
CLI fallback:
- Use
python scripts/prosperity_research_cli.py <tool> --input-file <payload.json> --output <result.json>. - Prefer explicit input/output files for long loops so transport timeouts do not hide completed artifacts.
- Include same budget fields as MCP payloads. Use stable input/output files and inspect session artifacts before retrying after timeout.
Autoresearch/time-budget behavior:
- Treat wall-clock budget as real. Do not stop early only because a current best candidate exists unless user budget is exhausted, user cancels, or an explicit stop rule fires.
run_alpha_autoresearch_loopis fixed-budget orchestration. It persistsiteration_runtime_msas per-iteration subprocess budget and respectsmax_total_runtime_seconds.- Generator lane should synthesize or evaluate fresh generated labels before replay.
- Evaluation lane should run R3/R4 replay batches against explicit candidate labels.
- Algorithm experiment lane is optional and bounded. Use
run_algorithm_autoresearch_experimentswithagent_recipes[],research_program, andfixed_time_budget_secondswhen the agent proposes directalgorithm.pychanges. - Continuous Karpathy-style autoresearch requires the outer agent to repeatedly propose new
agent_recipes[], validate under a fixed budget, read the artifact/ratchet, update the hypothesis, and repeat until remaining budget is below the next validation slice. A static recipe catalog is not enough. - Minimum loop for any multi-hour budget:
- Set a deadline from user time budget.
- Draft fresh non-duplicate
agent_recipes[]from current artifacts, losses, and lessons. - Call
prosperityResearch.run_algorithm_autoresearch_experimentswithfixed_time_budget_seconds <= remaining_time. - Read returned
artifact_path; inspectratchet,best_variant,errors, and discarded variants. - Generate next recipe from evidence. Do not repeat recipe after a dedup/cache hit.
- Continue until remaining time is below one validation slice or user cancels.
- Stop/relaunch when generated labels are empty, replay fingerprints repeat, or algorithm-cache fingerprints repeat; widen parents, recipes, or candidate generation before spending more replay budget.
Subagent policy:
- Spawn one bounded subagent per clearly separable investigative workstream for non-trivial work.
- Good subagent roles:
- history reviewer
- candidate reviewer
- verification reviewer
- code impact reviewer
- Each subagent must return:
- scope inspected
- key findings
- risks or caveats
- recommended next step
Output contract:
- Always return concise research summary.
- If there is a strong candidate, include:
- candidate name
- why it is promising
- expected edge or diversification contribution
- major risks
- implementation outline
- If there is not yet a strong candidate, include:
- top rejected ideas and why
- top open questions
- recommended next experiment batch
Guardrails:
- Do not claim strategy is good without evaluation evidence from research session.
- Do not recommend implementation before checking prior attempts and current frontier.
- Prefer small, testable iterations over broad rewrites.
- Do not give a final answer while a user-provided research time budget remains and the MCP is still able to validate more
agent_recipes[]. - Inspect session manifest/artifacts after MCP transport timeout before retrying; long runs may have completed and persisted evidence.
- Keep negative evidence. Discard means no robust frontier advance, not deletion.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.