Review implementation
Review code changes made in a session. Use only when user instructs or other skill references.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add hesprs/harness --skill review-implementationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, 570 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Audit Plan
Core Mandate
Review the implementation against its effect, and optimize for maintainability.
Workflow
1. Validate Completeness
Read code against the plan, verify that all planned file edits are present and compliant. And the code is able to run without obvious bugs. If found anything missing or wrong, stop and report the fact in detail.
2. Tighten Code Quality
If validation passes, according to Code Simplification section, report back with a comprehensive simplification suggestion.
Code Simplification
Simplify code by reducing complexity while preserving exact behavior.
1. Preserve Behavior Exactly
Don't change what the code does — only how it expresses it. Before every change, ask:
- Does this produce the same output for every input?
- Does this maintain the same error behavior?
- Does this preserve the same side effects and ordering?
- Do all existing tests still pass without modification?
2. Follow Project Conventions
Simplification means making code more consistent with the codebase, not imposing external preferences.
Before simplifying:
- Study how neighboring code handles similar patterns
- Match the project's style for imports, naming, function style, error handling, and type annotations
Simplification that breaks project consistency is not simplification — it's churn.
3. Prefer Clarity Over Cleverness
Explicit code is better than compact code when the compact version requires a mental pause to parse.
- Replace nested ternaries with readable control flow
- Replace dense inline transforms with named intermediate steps when they clarify intent
- Keep helpful names even if they cost a few extra lines
4. Maintain Balance
Watch for over-simplification:
- Don't inline away names that carry meaning
- Don't merge unrelated logic into one larger function
- Don't remove abstractions that serve testability or extensibility
5. Simplification Signals
- Deep nesting
- Long functions with mixed responsibilities
- Nested ternaries
- Boolean flag arguments
- Repeated conditionals
- Generic, misleading, or too long names
- Duplicated logic
- Over-defensive guard or normalization that you can ensure it has been check before
- Dead code
- Wrappers or abstractions that add no value
- Unused exports or public methods shat should be kept local
- Nested
describe(),it()tests -> flatten to top leveltest()
6. When Not Simplify
- Code is already clean and readable
- You don't understand what the code does yet
- The code is performance-critical and the "simpler" version would be measurably slower
- You're about to rewrite the module entirely
- Code is about frontend UI
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.