agentsclimarketplace

Finalize

Skill grimoire-rs/grimoire-vscode/.claude/skills/finalize

VS Code marketplace UI for grim — the OCI package manager for AI artifacts (skills, rules, agents, MCP servers, bundles).

Install
npx -y skills add grimoire-rs/grimoire-vscode --skill finalize

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 26 days oldThe repository was created 26 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when the user says "finalize", "/finalize", "prepare this branch for main", "clean up history", "squash the branch", or landing a branch on `main`. Rewrites Checkpoint working-phase commits into clean Conventional Commits before fast-forward merge. Flags: `--squash-all`, `--dry-run`.

SKILL.md

12.6 KB, ~2.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

/finalize — Prepare Branch for Fast-Forward Merge

Rewrites commits in main..HEAD so branch fast-forwards onto main as clean Conventional Commits sequence. Rebasing phase of two-phase branch workflow — see workflow-git.md for full model.

Sibling /commit skill handles working phase (save progress during dev). /finalize takes messy result, produces what lands in main-branch changelog.

When To Use

SituationUse
Branch has multiple Checkpoint commits/finalize
Branch has working-phase bundles ("chore(claude): bundle skill + rules + agents")/finalize
Rebasing branch onto current main before fast-forward/finalize
Branch is one changelog entry with noise between/finalize --squash-all
Already one-concern-per-commit and rebaseddon't — fast-forward

Flags

  • --squash-all — skip per-commit analysis, collapse main..HEAD into single commit. Skill drafts one message for whole diff, asks approval.
  • --dry-run — produce classification + rebase plan, show, no execute. Useful for review.
  • --force — skip the active-phase check (still honors other refuse conditions). Use when no plan tracks the branch or Status block is intentionally stale.

Workflow

1. Snapshot state (parallel batch)

  • git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD — current branch
  • git status --porcelain=v1 — working tree clean?
  • git fetch origin main --quiet 2>/dev/null then git rev-parse main and git rev-parse origin/main 2>/dev/null — detect if local main lags origin/main
  • git log --oneline main..HEAD — commits to finalize
  • git log -1 --pretty=%s main — tip of main (plan reference)
  • git rev-list --count main..HEAD — commit count
  • git diff --stat main..HEAD — diff shape
  • git merge-base --is-ancestor main HEAD; echo $? — local main ancestor of HEAD? (0 = yes, branch based on current local main; 1 = no, needs rebase onto main as part of finalize)

Refuse to proceed if:

  • Current branch is main — tell user switch to feature/worktree branch first.
  • main..HEAD empty — nothing to finalize.
  • Working tree dirty — tell user commit or stash with /commit first. No auto-stash; user must consciously save state.
  • Plan still in flight — read .claude/state/current_plan.md; if pointer present, parse the referenced plan's ## Status block. Refuse if Step is not finalized/awaiting /finalize or Active phase is not the last plan phase. --force overrides. Schema → plan-status.md.

Rebase target — always current local main. /finalize produces branch fast-forwarding onto local main HEAD. Two cases:

  1. Branch already based on current main (merge-base --is-ancestor main HEAD returns 0). Rebase only rewrites commits in main..HEAD for hygiene — no parent change, no upstream-drift conflict risk.
  2. Branch behind main (returns 1). Rebase does double duty: rewrites commits in main..HEAD for hygiene and moves branch onto current main HEAD. Conflicts here real, human resolves (see Step 4).

Both cases use git rebase -i main, replays merge-base..HEAD onto current main.

origin/main handling. If local main behind origin/main, surface before drafting plan, ask user how to proceed:

OptionEffect
Fast-forward local main first, then finalize (default)git fetch origin main && git checkout main && git merge --ff-only origin/main && git checkout <branch> then continue. Branch lands on top of latest published main.
Finalize against current local mainSkip fetch. Branch fast-forwards onto local main but may lag origin once published.
AbortStop without changes.

Never touch origin/main directly (no force-push, no remote updates beyond fetch).

2. Classify each commit in main..HEAD

For every commit in main..HEAD, assign one category:

CategorySignalAction
KeepClean Conventional Commits subject, single concern, useful changelog entryLeave alone
RewordSingle concern but subject non-conventional, typo'd, or mis-typed (e.g. fix: for real feat:)Rewrite subject only, keep diff
SquashTwo+ adjacent commits cover same concern (fix + follow-up fixup, feat + missed test, rolling checkpoint amendments)Collapse into one with drafted message
SplitOne commit mixes unrelated concernsOffer git reset HEAD^ workflow; defer to human if non-trivial
DropEmpty commit, reverted earlier in branch, pure noiseRemove
CheckpointSubject exactly CheckpointReword (single concern inside) or squash into neighbour

Classification heuristics:

  • Subject line first. Non-conventional → Reword candidate.
  • git show --stat <sha> for diff shape. Small diff, one module → likely Keep/Reword. Large diff, many modules → inspect body for multi-concern signals (- bullet lists, and, also, plus, bundle language).
  • chore(claude): commits touching only .claude/ or CLAUDE.md belong in working-phase, but on finalized branch should still be individually legitimate chore(claude): entries, not bundles.
  • git log --format=%B <sha> -1 for full message when subject ambiguous.

3. Draft the rebase plan

Present as numbered list user can scan. Example:

Rebase plan for evelynn (5 commits in main..HEAD):

  1. KEEP    a2a7072 feat(mirror): per-platform asset_type override
  2. SQUASH  b1c2d3e Checkpoint              → fold into (3)
  3. REWORD  e4f5g6h chore(claude): wip             → feat(cli): add --remote flag to catalog
  4. DROP    9a8b7c6 Revert previous wip fix  (undone later in the branch)
  5. KEEP    1234567 docs(guide): document --remote flag

Target base: main (039c066)
Final commit count: 3

Use AskUserQuestion with three options:

OptionEffect
Execute plan (default)Run scripted rebase
Edit planLet user adjust before exec (describe change in prose, redraw)
AbortStop without changes

If user picked --dry-run, print plan and stop regardless of choice.

4. Execute the rebase (non-interactive)

Use scripted non-interactive git rebase -i pattern — never launch $EDITOR. Base always current local main, so same command both rewrites internal history (per plan) and replays branch onto latest local main HEAD.

# Capture starting state for emergency rollback
START_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

# Build a rebase-todo file from the plan, then run rebase with
# GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR pointing at `cat` on that file, and
# GIT_EDITOR pointing at a script that replaces any commit message
# during reword/squash with the pre-drafted one.
GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="cp $TODO_FILE" \
GIT_EDITOR="$MSG_SCRIPT" \
git rebase -i main

Implementation notes:

  • Generate rebase-todo file in temp dir. Each line is pick|reword|squash|fixup|drop <sha> <subject>.
  • For reword/squash, pre-write target message to files named by SHA; GIT_EDITOR script reads matching file, overwrites message.
  • On rebase conflict: stop, print conflicted file list, tell user what to do (git status, edit, git rebase --continue), exit. Do not auto-resolve.
  • On success: show rewritten git log --oneline main..HEAD and final commit count.
  • Backout: git rebase --abort (if still rebasing) or git reset --hard $START_SHA (if rebase done but user unhappy). Offer both explicitly.

5. --squash-all mode

When --squash-all passed, skip steps 2–4, instead:

  1. Draft single Conventional Commits message covering full main..HEAD diff. Read git log main..HEAD for scope/concern inspiration but result is one commit — subject describes real user-visible change, not enumerate fixups.
  2. Show drafted message. Ask approval.
  3. Execute:
    git reset --soft main
    git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
    <drafted message>
    EOF
    )"
    
  4. Report new HEAD sha + subject.

Squash-all right when branch really one changelog entry — e.g. feature across 8 checkpoints + 3 fixups. Wrong when branch has independent concerns (refactor + unrelated bug fix) — decline, use per-commit plan instead.

6. Quality gate after rebase

After rebase, task verify must still pass on new HEAD. Run it. On fail:

  1. Show failure.
  2. User fixes (rebases can expose test interactions invisible in messy history).
  3. On fix, rerun /commit (working phase for fix) then /finalize again if more shaping needed.

No push. Never push.

7. Mark plan finalized + clear current_plan.md

After successful rebase, if a Status block exists in the plan referenced by .claude/state/current_plan.md: set Step: to finalized, bump Last update: (with new HEAD sha), delete .claude/state/current_plan.md. Skip silently when no plan / no Status block / --force was used.

8. Report

Starting → final commit count, whether task verify passed, whether Status was marked finalized and current_plan.md cleared, next step for user (git checkout main && git merge --ff-only <branch> if asked; else stop).

Safety Rules

  • Always capture START_SHA before first destructive op. Offer git reset --hard $START_SHA as recovery command if user unhappy.
  • Never force-push. Skill only rewrites local history. Human decides push.
  • Never touch commits already on origin/<branch> without explicit confirmation. Rewriting published history fine on feature branch human controls, but skill must flag (git rev-list origin/<branch>..HEAD for local-only vs published).
  • Never auto-resolve conflicts. On conflict, stop, hand back to user.
  • Never launch $EDITOR. Always scripted GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR + GIT_EDITOR pattern with pre-written files.

References

  • workflow-git.md — shared branch/commit hygiene: branching model, two-phase model, Checkpoint convention, land-ready definition
  • task git:merge — the fast-forward step this skill prepares for

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most pr commit review skills give in ~2.6k tokens

Counted across 888 of the 1,342 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Use conventional commits formatin 127 of 888, across 115 files
  • Keep subject line under 72 charactersin 62 of 888, across 48 files
  • Delete branches after mergein 51 of 888, across 38 files
  • Use imperative mood in subject linein 51 of 888, across 42 files
  • Use imperative mood in commit messagesin 44 of 888
  • Verify directory is ignored before creating worktreein 43 of 888, across 12 files
  • Generate a conventional commit messagein 43 of 888
  • Add unignored worktree directories to gitignorein 42 of 888, across 10 files
  • Make atomic commitsin 39 of 888, across 27 files
  • Run tests before committingin 36 of 888, across 25 files
  • Verify clean test baselinein 35 of 888, across 9 files
  • Split unrelated changes into separate commitsin 35 of 888, across 30 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • run git commands to snapshot branch state
  • refuse to proceed if a plan is still active
  • draft an interactive rebase plan
  • present the rebase plan using AskUserQuestion
  • mark the active plan as finalized

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.