Honey design
Same pixels, fewer tokens — for user-facing deliverables where visual polish is the spec. Use when building or editing a landing page, marketing site, hero, pricing/feature section, dashboard, or any HTML/CSS UI component. Keeps the full rendered design (layout depth, hierarchy, motion, responsive richness, a11y) and cuts tokens by expressing that design densely — CSS custom properties, shared classes, shorthand, fluid units — instead of by cutting the design. The honey core trims code and prose; this trims how the design is *written*, never how it looks. Reach for it whenever output is user-facing markup, even if the user never says "minimal".From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Green-PT/honey-for-devs --skill honey-designAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
4.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Honey Design (same pixels, fewer tokens)
For user-facing deliverables — landing pages, marketing sites, UI components — polish is the spec. A bare, valid-but-ugly page is a fail, not a saving.
So the token lever here is not "emit less design." It's "express the same design densely." Compress the code, never the rendered result. If a cut would change a single pixel of the finished page, it's the wrong cut.
Apply reflexively, as a writing style — don't deliberate which rule fires or spend reasoning tokens on the skill itself. Build the polished thing; write its markup and CSS the dense way by habit.
Hold the line on polish (the judged axis)
Never trade these for tokens — they are the deliverable:
- Visual depth — considered layout, spacing rhythm, real visual hierarchy, on-brand color and type. Not unstyled scaffolding.
- Every requested section, fully fleshed — nav, hero, features, pricing, footer, etc. A stubbed-out section is incomplete, not minimal.
- Interaction & motion — hover/focus states, transitions, the small touches that read as "finished."
- Responsive richness — genuinely good on mobile and desktop, not a desktop page that merely doesn't break.
- Accessibility — labelled controls,
alton every image, semantic landmarks, visible focus, sufficient contrast, keyboard paths. - Anything the user explicitly asked for.
The token lever — dense expression, identical render
Produce the same finished page with fewer tokens by removing repetition and verbosity in the code, never richness from the design:
CSS
- Custom properties for anything used more than once — palette, spacing scale,
radius, shadow, transition. Define in
:rootonce, reference everywhere. The single biggest saver: a repeated#1a1a2e/24px/box-shadow:…becomesvar(--…). - Shared classes over repeated blocks. Three feature cards = one
.cardrule, not three near-identical declaration blocks. Style by class, never inline. - Shorthand properties —
margin,padding,inset,font,flex,background,border,gridshorthands over their longhand expansions. - Fluid sizing to collapse media queries —
clamp()/min()/max()and%/fr/vwfor type and spacing, plusgrid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(…,1fr))andflex-wrap. One fluid rule often replaces a base rule plus two@mediaoverrides. Keep an@mediaonly where layout genuinely must change. - Group selectors that share rules (
h1,h2,h3{…}); one concise reset, not a verbose normalize; short hex (#fff), no units on0, no trailing-zero noise. - No dead, duplicated, or commented-out CSS.
HTML
- Semantic landmarks, no redundant wrapper divs — `<header><nav><main><section> <footer>` carry structure; don't nest divs that do nothing.
- No inline
style=repetition — push it to a class. - Concise, real-feeling copy — enough to sell the design; no padded lorem.
Prose around the artifact: near-zero. The page is the answer. No "Here's your landing page!", no walkthrough of what you built. One line max if something is genuinely load-bearing (e.g. a font dependency).
Self-check before you finish
Would the rendered page look identical with and without each compression?
If yes — ship it; you moved cost out of the tokens, not out of the design. If a "saving" drops a hover state, a gradient, a section, a breakpoint, or an a11y attribute, it failed the test — restore it. Density that degrades the render isn't a win, it's the cheaper-and-worse variant this skill exists to beat.