Error analysis
Skill Goodeye-Labs/truesight-mcp-skills/skills/error-analysis
Agent skills for the Truesight MCP. Step-by-step workflow playbooks for scoring inputs, building live evaluations, error analysis, and the review loop. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT, VS Code, Windsurf, and any client that supports the agent skills standard.
npx -y skills add Goodeye-Labs/truesight-mcp-skills --skill error-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Systematically identify and categorize failure modes in evaluated traces using Truesight datasets and error-analysis tools. Use when quality issues are unclear, after major pipeline changes, or when incidents indicate drift.
SKILL.md
3.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Error Analysis
Guide the user through trace-grounded failure analysis and dataset labeling.
Interactive Q&A protocol (mandatory)
<HARD-GATE> BEFORE the first scoping question, search for a structured question tool (e.g., `AskUserQuestion` or similar interactive widget) and load it. Use that tool for EVERY scoping question. Fall back to plain-text lettered options ONLY if no such tool exists in the environment. </HARD-GATE>Ask one question at a time using the structured question tool (loaded per the HARD-GATE above).
Example question structure:
Which data source should we analyze first?
A) Existing Truesight dataset
B) New dataset to upload
C) Unsure, list datasets first
Rules:
- One question per message during setup.
- Use the structured question tool for every question. Structure each with a short header, 2-4 options with labels and descriptions, and place the recommended option first. Do not add "(Recommended)" or similar annotations to option labels.
- Ask one follow-up if response is ambiguous.
Core workflow
- Select or create dataset:
- If dataset exists, use
list_datasets. - If not, use
upload_dataset.
- If dataset exists, use
- Collect representative traces:
- Target approximately 100 traces when possible.
- Use random plus stratified coverage when volume is high.
- Analyze row by row:
- Use
get_dataset_rowswith pagination. - For each row, call
suggest_error_notes.
- Use
- Persist annotations:
- Save
_ts_error_notesand_ts_error_categorywithupdate_dataset_row.
- Save
- Consolidate categories:
- Run
consolidate_error_categories. - Review mapping proposals, then apply with
apply_category_mappings.
- Run
- Prioritize fixes:
- Report most frequent categories first.
- Recommend next skill based on failure type:
create-evaluationfor new evaluation coveragereview-and-promote-tracesfor judgment backlogeval-auditfor broader process gaps
Analysis heuristics
- Focus on first root failure in each trace, not every downstream symptom.
- Let categories emerge from observed traces, not pre-baked labels.
- Iterate categories after 20 traces, then relabel for consistency.
- Stop when recent traces no longer reveal new failure categories.
Anti-patterns
- Defining categories before reading traces.
- Treating output quality labels as generic scores without concrete failure modes.
- Skipping relabel after category definitions change.
- Building new evaluators before fixing obvious prompt/tooling/engineering gaps.
Scopes reference
list_datasets,get_dataset_rowsrequiredatasets:readupload_dataset,update_dataset_row,apply_category_mappingsrequiredatasets:writesuggest_error_notes,consolidate_error_categoriesrequireerror-analysis:execute