Guard
Portable, evidence-driven agent development harness for Codex, Claude Code, and generic Agent Skills. Active beta v0.1.2.
npx -y skills add GhostlyGawd/recursive-harness --skill guardAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Configure or explain Recursive Guard, a separately trusted Codex plugin that is inert unless a repository explicitly adds a reviewed .recursive-guard.json policy. Use when a user wants opt-in protection for instruction, provider, hook, or other sensitive repository paths without replacing existing agent configuration.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Recursive Guard
Keep enforcement separate from advisory Recursive capabilities. Installing this plugin does
not edit a repository and does not enforce anything until the repository owner explicitly
adds .recursive-guard.json and trusts the bundled hook.
Read the policy contract before proposing integration.
Inspect first
- Preserve all existing
AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md,.codex/,.claude/, agents, skills, and hooks. - Check whether
.recursive-guard.jsonalready exists without reading unrelated config. - Explain that Codex requires a separate review/trust decision for the exact hook hash.
- Never create or change the policy without explicit approval for the exact patch.
Propose the smallest policy
Use schema version 1, choose audit before enforce when the repository owner wants a
trial, and list only repository-relative protected paths. The policy file protects itself.
{
"schema_version": 1,
"mode": "audit",
"protected_paths": ["AGENTS.md", "CLAUDE.md", ".codex", ".claude"]
}
Present that as a reviewed patch. Do not apply it merely because the plugin is installed.
Verify
After explicit integration, exercise one allowed path and one protected path. audit emits
a warning but permits the call; enforce denies supported matching tools. Confirm that
existing provider configuration remains otherwise unchanged.
This is a guardrail, not a sandbox. Codex documents that some specialized tool paths may bypass lifecycle hooks. Use repository permissions, branch protection, and CI for durable enforcement.
<!-- provenance: 2026-07-19 P-2026-044; separately trusted guard acceptance slice. -->