Funnel validator
Score and improve existing funnels against Hook-Story-Offer, value ladder fit, traffic match, and conversion path. Triggers on funnel validation, low conversion diagnosis, funnel audits, and pre-traffic readiness checks.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add genfeedai/skills --skill funnel-validatorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, 730 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Funnel Validator - DotCom Secrets Scorecard
Overview
Ruthlessly assess existing funnels against Russell Brunson's DotCom Secrets framework. Score objectively, expose conversion killers, prescribe actionable fixes.
Brunson's Core Principle: "You're one funnel away from changing your life."
When This Activates
- "validate my funnel" / "rate my funnel"
- "is my funnel good"
- "why isn't my funnel converting"
- Checking funnel before driving traffic
- Low conversion rates on landing pages
- Optimizing existing funnel
Key Difference from funnel-architect
- funnel-architect: Designing funnels from scratch
- funnel-validator: Assessing existing funnels, scoring, fixing
The Framework: DotCom Secrets Scorecard
HOOK (Grab Attention) → STORY (Build Connection) → OFFER (Close the Deal)
Scoring Dimensions (6 total):
| Dimension | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Hook Strength | 2x | Does it stop the scroll and grab attention? |
| Story Connection | 1.5x | Does it create emotional connection and belief? |
| Offer Clarity | 2x | Is the offer clear, compelling, and irresistible? |
| Value Ladder Fit | 1x | Does this funnel fit the ascension path? |
| Traffic Match | 1.5x | Is the funnel matched to traffic temperature? |
| Conversion Path | 1x | Is the next step obvious and frictionless? |
Max Score: 100 points
Rating Scale
| Score | Rating | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| 85-100 | Conversion Machine | Ready to scale. Minor optimizations only. |
| 70-84 | Strong Funnel | Good foundation. Fix weak points, then scale. |
| 55-69 | Leaky Funnel | Significant gaps. Fix before scaling traffic. |
| 40-54 | Broken Funnel | Major issues. Rebuild key components. |
| 0-39 | Non-Functional | Start over. Fundamental problems throughout. |
Traffic Temperature Reference
| Temperature | They Know | Appropriate Funnel |
|---|---|---|
| Cold | Nothing about you | Lead funnel, value-first content |
| Warm | Problem + your solution | Tripwire, webinar, challenge |
| Hot | Ready to buy | Sales page, order form, call booking |
Value Ladder Reference
1. Free: Lead magnet, free content
2. Low-Ticket: $7-97 tripwire, self-liquidating offer
3. Mid-Ticket: $97-997 course, program
4. High-Ticket: $1K-10K coaching, done-for-you
5. Continuity: Recurring membership, retainer
Integration
| Skill | When to Use |
|---|---|
funnel-architect | After validation, rebuild weak areas |
| Genfeed content-reviewer | Validate the copy on each page |
offer-validator | Validate the core offer separately |
traffic-architect | Design traffic strategy for validated funnel |
For complete scoring criteria for all 6 dimensions, red flags checklist, epiphany bridge framework, CTA best practices, output format template, example validations (leaky funnel, strong funnel), and common validation mistakes, see: references/full-guide.md
What ships with it: 3 files
13.7 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- full-guide.md11.9 KB
- metadata.json655 B
- README.md1.1 KB