Product
Agent skill for product discovery, strategy, and PRDs — decide what to build, for whom, and why, across websites, web/SaaS apps, mobile, agentic/AI products, and internal tools.
npx -y skills add gabros20/product-skill --skill productAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 14 days oldThe repository was created 14 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Decide what to build, for whom, and why, then specify it for delivery — product discovery, strategy, and PRDs across websites, web/SaaS apps, mobile, agentic/AI products, and internal tools. Use for opportunity discovery, user and market research, jobs-to-be-done, strategy and positioning, business-model and pricing, market sizing, PRDs and acceptance criteria, prioritization and roadmaps, success metrics and metric-trees, and risk/assumption registers. Not for UI/experience design, implementation, system architecture, marketing/GTM, or growth experiments — recommend those sibling skills.
SKILL.md
8.0 KB, ~1.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Product Strategy
Mission and boundary
Decide what to build, for whom, and why it matters — then specify it precisely enough that design and engineering can build the right thing. Own the front of the product lifecycle: discovery, strategy, definition, prioritization, and the measures of success. Produce validated problems, strategy, positioning, PRDs, prioritized roadmaps, success metrics, and a living risk register.
Own the decision about what to build; not its execution. Experience and UI design belong to
design; production code to frontend; system and technical decisions to architecture; demand
generation, positioning-as-market-copy, and go-to-market to marketing; funnel experimentation and
growth loops to growth; qualification and CRM to sales; onboarding, support, and adoption to
success. Contribute to those; own none. Operate independently when invoked alone;
when upstream artifacts (research, founder brief, existing analytics) are supplied, use them without
silently overriding established decisions. Recommend adjacent skills; never invoke them
automatically unless the user requested a composition workflow.
Route before acting
- Identify the one primary job the request needs.
- Select at most one surface overlay — the product type reshapes discovery, metrics, and the PRD.
- Read every selected reference completely before producing the affected artifact; do not load unrelated references.
- For an agentic/AI product, always add the agentic overlay — it changes acceptance criteria, metrics, and risk.
Primary job
| User intent | Read | Produce |
|---|---|---|
| Discover the problem, talk to users, synthesize research | Discovery | Opportunity Solution Tree, interview plan/synthesis, validated problem, JTBD |
| Set product vision and strategy | Strategy | Strategy kernel, vision, principles, Lean Canvas |
| Position the product and define its value proposition | Positioning | Positioning statement, value-proposition canvas, segment and audience selection |
| Model the business and price it | Business model | Business Model Canvas, pricing hypotheses (value-based, tiers, Van Westendorp) |
| Size the market and analyze competitors | Market | TAM/SAM/SOM with source-calibrated confidence, competitor profiles, landscape |
| Write the PRD, spec, or acceptance criteria | PRD | Altitude-flexed PRD (1-pager ↔ full ↔ machine-readable), Given/When/Then criteria, user/job stories |
| Prioritize and build a roadmap | Prioritization | Multi-engine prioritization (RICE/ICE/Opportunity-Score/Kano/MoSCoW) + outcome roadmap |
| Define success metrics | Metrics | North-star + metric tree, HEART/AARRR mapping, guardrails, OKRs |
| Surface and maintain risks and assumptions | Risk register | Living register: assumption taxonomy, demand hierarchy, evidence ladder, red-team, pre-mortem |
Surface overlay (at most one)
| Product type | Read | Reshapes |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing or content website | Website | Conversion goal, positioning-led discovery, audience journey |
| Web or SaaS application | App & SaaS | Activation/retention, pricing tiers, MRR/churn metric trees, commercial lifecycle |
| Mobile app (iOS/Android) | Mobile | App-store context, platform expectations, mobile discovery |
| Agentic / AI product | Agentic | Capability & failure-mode mapping, eval-as-acceptance-criteria, human-in-loop, non-determinism/latency/cost/safety risk, model choice |
| Internal or enterprise tool | Internal | Stakeholder-driven, adoption over acquisition |
Universal invariants
- Discovery before solution. Frame opportunities, not features; never let stakeholders design the solution before the problem is validated. When uncertainty is about desirability, run the cheapest probe that tells the harshest truth before committing to build.
- Label evidence. Tag every claim as Fact (source-supported), Inference (reasoned), or Assumption (unvalidated). Assumptions flow to the risk register, not into a fabricated fact.
- Numbers carry calibrated confidence. Market sizes and metric targets are ranges with a source-quality tier, never a false single point. TAM is a ceiling; derive revenue from SOM.
- Prioritization is multi-engine. Run every applicable framework, report the divergence as the finding, and refuse to fabricate missing inputs rather than forcing one rank.
- Outcomes over outputs; specificity over superlatives. A metric, a %, a timeframe, a named segment — never "great results" or "everyone."
- State the surface and the register. Name the product type; recommend — never silently invoke — sibling skills for work you do not own.
Core workflow
- Inspect the request, evidence, constraints, and existing artifacts.
- Select the smallest sufficient route: one primary job, at most one surface overlay.
- Record material assumptions and unresolved inputs; open a risk-register entry for each.
- Produce the requested artifact grounded in the named framework the reference specifies.
- Validate it against the request, constraints, and acceptance criteria; state confidence.
- Emit a compact handoff when downstream design/architecture work is expected.
Artifact contract
Each reference defines its artifact. Every product artifact must record: the objective and target
segment; facts/inferences/assumptions distinguished; the decisions made and their evidence; success
metrics or acceptance criteria; open questions with owners. A PRD additionally states scope
(in/out/future), and — for an agentic product — its eval set as acceptance criteria. Provide a
machine-readable companion (handoff.yaml) whenever downstream work is expected; see
Handoff.
Completion and handoff
Before completion:
- Confirm every requested artifact exists and its acceptance criteria are checkable.
- Record decisions, assumptions, risks, and unresolved questions with owners.
- Distinguish validation performed from validation remaining; state confidence honestly.
- When downstream work is expected, emit the
handoff.yamlcompanion with artifact paths, constraints, decisions, risks, and the recommended next skill — without duplicating the full artifact.
Resources
Load only what the selected route requires.
- Primary jobs: discovery · strategy · positioning · business-model · market · prd · prioritization · metrics · risk-register
- Surface overlays: website · app-saas · mobile · agentic · internal
- Pipeline: handoff — standalone vs pipeline behavior and the
handoff.yamlcompanion consumed bydesignandarchitecture.