Github doc sync
A collection of Claude skills.
npx -y skills add Fyzel/claude-skills --skill github-doc-syncAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Keep a GitHub project's documentation in sync with the code after a change — propagate feature, CLI, config, exit-code, or install changes across the README, in-repo guide files (CLAUDE.md, CONTRIBUTING, docs/), and the GitHub wiki. Use this skill whenever the user says "sync the docs", "update the docs", "doc sync", "update README and wiki", "keep docs in sync", after resolving an issue or merging a feature, or when a hook/reminder flags that source changed and docs may be stale. Works for any GitHub repo. Requires `git`; the wiki step needs the repo's wiki enabled, and pushing needs `gh`/git push access.
SKILL.md
4.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
GitHub Doc Sync
Propagate a code change into every place the project documents it: README, in-repo guides
(CLAUDE.md / CONTRIBUTING / docs/), and the GitHub wiki. One pass, no drift.
When to use
- After a change to a user-facing feature, CLI flag, config schema, exit code, or install steps.
- When the user says "sync the docs", "update README and wiki", or resolves an issue and wants docs caught up.
- When a project hook or memory reminds that source changed and docs may be stale.
Step 0 — Find what each project treats as "docs"
Don't assume. Detect the doc surfaces present in this repo:
-
README:
README.md(or.rst/.adoc) at repo root. -
In-repo guides:
CLAUDE.md,CONTRIBUTING.md,docs/,AGENTS.md— whichever exist. -
Wiki: GitHub wikis are a separate git repo at
OWNER/REPO.wiki.git. Check it exists:SLUG=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner) git ls-remote "https://github.com/$SLUG.wiki.git" >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "wiki exists"
Only sync surfaces that actually exist. If the project has a memory note or CLAUDE.md rule about which docs to keep synced, honor it.
Step 1 — Identify what changed
Determine the user-facing delta from the diff, not guesswork:
git diff --stat HEAD~1 # or against the merge-base of the feature branch
Map the change to doc-relevant facts: new/changed CLI flag, config key, exit code, default, install/dependency step, supported behavior. Things that do not change docs (internal refactor, test-only, comment) → skip; say so.
Step 2 — Update the README
Sync the affected sections: usage/CLI, configuration schema, exit codes, install steps, feature list. Match the README's existing structure and tone — edit in place, don't rewrite.
Step 3 — Update in-repo guides
CLAUDE.md: keep the module/responsibility tables, CLI summary, and exit-code list accurate — these guide future sessions.CONTRIBUTING.md/docs/: update if the change touches build, test, or contribution flow.
Step 4 — Update the GitHub wiki
The wiki is a separate repo. Clone, edit the relevant pages, commit, push:
SLUG=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner)
tmp=$(mktemp -d)
git clone "https://github.com/$SLUG.wiki.git" "$tmp"
# edit pages in $tmp (Home.md, Usage.md, Configuration.md, etc. — match existing page names)
git -C "$tmp" add -A
git -C "$tmp" commit -m "docs: sync wiki with <change>"
git -C "$tmp" push
Match existing wiki page names and the sidebar (_Sidebar.md) if present. Don't invent a new
page when an existing one covers the topic.
Step 5 — Verify consistency
Cross-check the three surfaces agree on the same facts (a CLI flag's name, an exit code's meaning, a config key's default). The most common drift is one surface updated and another missed — confirm all of them now match the code.
Step 6 — Wrap up
Report what was updated per surface (README sections, in-repo files, wiki pages) and what was intentionally skipped. README and in-repo edits land in the working tree (commit only when the user asks). Wiki pushes are live immediately — confirm with the user before pushing wiki changes if there is any doubt.
Gotchas
- Wiki is a separate repo: edits to
OWNER/REPO.wiki.gitare not part of the code PR and push live on commit — there is no review step. Treat a wiki push like publishing. - Detect, don't assume: not every repo has a wiki, CLAUDE.md, or
docs/. Skip absent surfaces instead of creating them unprompted. - Match house style: edit existing sections/pages in place; preserve heading structure, tables, and tone rather than rewriting.
- Internal-only changes: refactors, tests, and comments usually need no doc change — say so rather than touching docs needlessly.