Simulation orchestrator
Skill FridrichMethod/awesome-skills/skills/simulation-orchestrator
Curated, auto-synced collection of 2,000+ Claude Code & Codex skills for AI4Protein, bioinformatics, AI development, and academic paper writing. One curl command installs them all.
npx -y skills add FridrichMethod/awesome-skills --skill simulation-orchestratorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 11 stars11 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Orchestrate multi-simulation campaigns including parameter sweeps, batch jobs, and result aggregation. Use for running parameter studies, managing simulation batches, tracking job status, combining results from multiple runs, or automating simulation workflows.
SKILL.md
7.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Simulation Orchestrator
Goal
Provide tools to manage multi-simulation campaigns: generate parameter sweeps, track job execution status, and aggregate results from completed runs.
Requirements
- Python 3.10+
- No external dependencies (uses Python standard library only)
- Works on Linux, macOS, and Windows
Inputs to Gather
Before running orchestration scripts, collect from the user:
| Input | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Base config | Template simulation configuration | base_config.json |
| Parameter ranges | Parameters to sweep with bounds | dt:[1e-4,1e-2],kappa:[0.1,1.0] |
| Sweep method | How to sample parameter space | grid, lhs, linspace |
| Output directory | Where to store campaign files | ./campaign_001 |
| Simulation command | Command to run each simulation | python sim.py --config {config} |
Decision Guidance
Choosing a Sweep Method
Need every combination (full factorial)?
├── YES → Use grid (warning: exponential growth with parameters)
└── NO → Is space-filling coverage needed?
├── YES → Use lhs (Latin Hypercube Sampling)
└── NO → Use linspace for uniform sampling per parameter
| Method | Best For | Sample Count |
|---|---|---|
grid | Low dimensions (1-3), need exact corners | n^d (exponential) |
linspace | 1D sweeps, uniform spacing | n per parameter |
lhs | High dimensions, space-filling | user-specified budget |
Campaign Size Guidelines
| Parameters | Grid Points Each | Total Runs | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 10 | Grid is fine |
| 2 | 10 | 100 | Grid acceptable |
| 3 | 10 | 1,000 | Consider LHS |
| 4+ | 10 | 10,000+ | Use LHS or DOE |
Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Output Fields |
|---|---|
scripts/sweep_generator.py | configs, parameter_space, sweep_method, total_runs |
scripts/campaign_manager.py | campaign_id, status, jobs, progress |
scripts/job_tracker.py | job_id, status, start_time, end_time, exit_code |
scripts/result_aggregator.py | summary, statistics, best_run, failed_runs |
Workflow
Step 1: Generate Parameter Sweep
Create configurations for all parameter combinations:
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
--base-config base_config.json \
--params "dt:1e-4:1e-2:5,kappa:0.1:1.0:3" \
--method linspace \
--output-dir ./campaign_001 \
--json
Step 2: Initialize Campaign
Create campaign tracking structure:
python3 scripts/campaign_manager.py \
--action init \
--config-dir ./campaign_001 \
--command "python sim.py --config {config}" \
--json
Step 3: Track Job Status
Monitor running jobs:
python3 scripts/job_tracker.py \
--campaign-dir ./campaign_001 \
--update \
--json
Step 4: Aggregate Results
Combine results from completed runs:
python3 scripts/result_aggregator.py \
--campaign-dir ./campaign_001 \
--metric objective_value \
--json
CLI Examples
# Generate 5x3=15 runs varying dt (5 values) and kappa (3 values)
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
--base-config sim.json \
--params "dt:1e-4:1e-2:5,kappa:0.1:1.0:3" \
--method linspace \
--output-dir ./sweep_001 \
--json
# Generate LHS samples for 4 parameters with budget of 20 runs
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \
--base-config sim.json \
--params "dt:1e-4:1e-2,kappa:0.1:1.0,M:1e-6:1e-4,W:0.5:2.0" \
--method lhs \
--samples 20 \
--output-dir ./lhs_001 \
--json
# Check campaign status
python3 scripts/campaign_manager.py \
--action status \
--config-dir ./sweep_001 \
--json
# Get summary statistics from completed runs
python3 scripts/result_aggregator.py \
--campaign-dir ./sweep_001 \
--metric final_energy \
--json
Conversational Workflow Example
User: I want to run a parameter sweep on dt and kappa for my phase-field simulation. I want to try 5 values of dt between 1e-4 and 1e-2, and 4 values of kappa between 0.1 and 1.0.
Agent workflow:
- Calculate total runs: 5 x 4 = 20 runs
- Generate sweep configurations:
python3 scripts/sweep_generator.py \ --base-config simulation.json \ --params "dt:1e-4:1e-2:5,kappa:0.1:1.0:4" \ --method linspace \ --output-dir ./dt_kappa_sweep \ --json - Initialize campaign:
python3 scripts/campaign_manager.py \ --action init \ --config-dir ./dt_kappa_sweep \ --command "python phase_field.py --config {config}" \ --json - After user runs simulations, aggregate results:
python3 scripts/result_aggregator.py \ --campaign-dir ./dt_kappa_sweep \ --metric interface_width \ --json
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
Base config not found | Invalid file path | Verify base config file exists |
Invalid parameter format | Malformed param string | Use format name:min:max:count or name:min:max |
Output directory exists | Would overwrite | Use --force or choose new directory |
No completed jobs | No results to aggregate | Wait for jobs to complete or check for failures |
Metric not found | Result files missing field | Verify metric name in result JSON |
Integration with Other Skills
The simulation-orchestrator works with other simulation-workflow skills:
parameter-optimization simulation-orchestrator
│ │
│ DOE samples ────────────────>│ Generate configs
│ │
│ │ Run simulations
│ │
│<──────────────────────────── │ Aggregate results
│ │
│ Sensitivity analysis │
│ Optimizer selection │
Typical Combined Workflow
- Use
parameter-optimization/doe_generator.pyto get sample points - Use
simulation-orchestrator/sweep_generator.pyto create configs - Run simulations (user's responsibility)
- Use
simulation-orchestrator/result_aggregator.pyto collect results - Use
parameter-optimization/sensitivity_summary.pyto analyze
Limitations
- Not a job scheduler: Does not submit jobs to SLURM/PBS; generates configs and tracks status
- No parallel execution: User must run simulations externally (can use GNU parallel, SLURM, etc.)
- File-based tracking: Status tracked via files; no database or real-time monitoring
- Local filesystem: Assumes all files accessible from local machine
References
references/campaign_patterns.md- Common campaign structuresreferences/sweep_strategies.md- Parameter sweep design guidancereferences/aggregation_methods.md- Result aggregation techniques
Version History
- v1.0.0 (2024-12-24): Initial release with sweep, campaign, tracking, and aggregation
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most agent orchestration skills give
Counted across 742 of the 995 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- run the full test suite after integrating changesin 53 of 742, across 20 files
- reference existing artifacts by path or URLin 52 of 742, across 22 files
- dispatch one agent per independent problem domainin 50 of 742, across 17 files
- verify fixes do not conflictin 45 of 742, across 13 files
- include a suggested skills section in the documentin 45 of 742, across 15 files
- redact sensitive informationin 41 of 742, across 11 files
- save to the temporary directory of the operating systemin 39 of 742, across 9 files
- tailor the document to user-provided focus argumentsin 39 of 742, across 9 files
- spot check agent changes for systematic errorsin 34 of 742, across 7 files
- write a handoff document summarising the current conversationin 31 of 742, across 6 files
- assign each agent a specific scopein 23 of 742, across 8 files
- provide specific scope and clear goalin 23 of 742, across 5 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.