Scientific manuscript
Skill FridrichMethod/awesome-skills/skills/scientific-manuscript
High-impact scientific manuscript preparation for journals like Nature, Blood, Cell. Use when writing abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussions, or figure legends. Includes citation management, statistical reporting standards, ICMJE guidelines, and journal-specific formatting for hematology/oncology publications.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add FridrichMethod/awesome-skills --skill scientific-manuscriptAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 13 stars13 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as Proprietary. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.1 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Scientific Manuscript Preparation
Document Structure for High-Impact Journals
Title
- Concise (<15 words for Nature, <20 for Blood)
- Include key finding and system/disease
- Avoid jargon and abbreviations
Abstract (Structured for Blood/Clinical Journals)
**Background:** One sentence on knowledge gap.
**Methods:** Key approaches, patient cohort size, techniques.
**Results:** Primary findings with statistics (P values, CIs).
**Conclusions:** Clinical/translational significance.
Introduction (~500-800 words)
- Paragraph 1: Broad context, disease burden, clinical relevance
- Paragraph 2: Current knowledge, key mechanisms
- Paragraph 3: Knowledge gap, unanswered questions
- Paragraph 4: Study aims, hypothesis, approach overview
Methods (Detailed, Reproducible)
**Patient Cohort and Samples**
- IRB approval number, consent process
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Sample processing, storage conditions
**Single-Cell RNA Sequencing**
- Library preparation (10x Genomics Chromium 3' v3.1)
- Sequencing platform, read depth
- Quality metrics (cells/sample, genes/cell, % mitochondrial)
**Computational Analysis**
- Software versions (Scanpy 1.9.x, scvi-tools 0.20.x)
- QC thresholds (min genes, max %MT)
- Integration method (TotalVI, Harmony)
- Clustering parameters (resolution, n_neighbors)
- Differential expression (Wilcoxon, FDR < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1)
**Statistical Analysis**
- Software (R 4.3.x, Python 3.11)
- Tests used with justification
- Multiple testing correction method
- Power analysis if applicable
Results (~2000-3000 words)
- Lead each paragraph with key finding
- Reference figures in order (Figure 1A-C...)
- Report exact P values (P = 0.003, not P < 0.05)
- Include confidence intervals where relevant
- Avoid interpretation; save for Discussion
Discussion (~1500-2000 words)
**Paragraph 1**: Summarize key findings, relate to hypothesis
**Paragraph 2-4**: Compare to existing literature
- "Consistent with [Author et al.], we found..."
- "In contrast to [Study], our analysis revealed..."
- Mechanistic interpretation
**Paragraph 5**: Translational/Clinical implications
- Therapeutic targets
- Biomarkers
- Patient stratification
**Paragraph 6**: Limitations
- Sample size, cohort characteristics
- Technical limitations
- Generalizability
**Paragraph 7**: Future directions and conclusion
Statistical Reporting Standards
Continuous Variables
- Mean ± SD (normal) or Median [IQR] (non-normal)
- Report normality test used
Categorical Variables
- N (%) with comparison test
P Values
- Report exact values (P = 0.023)
- For very small: P < 0.0001
- Always report test used
Sample Sizes
- "n = X patients" or "n = X cells"
- Report for each comparison group
Figure Legends Template
**Figure 1. Title describes main finding**
(A) Brief description of panel A. Statistical test, P value.
(B) Description including axis labels if not obvious.
(C-D) Can combine similar panels.
Scale bars: X μm. Error bars: mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
n = X biological replicates from Y independent experiments.
Reference Formatting
Blood Journal (Vancouver)
1. Smith JA, Jones BC. Title of article. Blood. 2024;143(5):567-578.
Nature (Author-Year)
Smith, J.A. & Jones, B.C. Title of article. Nature 620, 567–578 (2024).
Journal-Specific Requirements
Blood (ASH)
- Word limit: 4000 (full article)
- Figures: 7 max
- References: 60 max
- Structured abstract: 250 words
Nature
- Word limit: ~3000 (Article)
- Main text figures: 6-8
- Methods: no limit, separate section
- Extended Data for supplementary figures
Cell
- Word limit: 7000 (Article)
- STAR Methods format
- Graphical abstract required
HIPAA Compliance Reminders
- No patient identifiers in any form
- Use Specimen IDs, not patient names/MRNs
- Aggregate data for small groups (n < 5)
- IRB approval statement required
- Data availability statement (GEO accession for sequencing)
Writing Style
- Active voice preferred
- Past tense for results ("We found...")
- Present tense for established facts
- Avoid "interesting," "significant" (unless statistical)
- Be specific: "83.9-fold increase" not "marked increase"
See references/journal_templates.md for specific formats.
See references/statistical_tests.md for test selection guide.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.