agentsclimarketplace

Pose validation

Skill FridrichMethod/awesome-skills/skills/pose-validation

Curated, auto-synced collection of 2,000+ Claude Code & Codex skills for AI4Protein, bioinformatics, AI development, and academic paper writing. One curl command installs them all.

Install
npx -y skills add FridrichMethod/awesome-skills --skill pose-validation

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 11 stars11 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Validates docked / generated protein-ligand poses using PoseBusters physical-validity tests, strain energy quantification, geometric checks (planarity, vdW overlap, bond/angle distortion), and pose-energy reasonableness. Use when QC-ing docking results, comparing classical vs ML docking outputs, or filtering pose lists before SAR analysis.

SKILL.md

15.6 KB, ~3.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: PoseBusters 0.6+, RDKit 2024.09+, pandas 2.2+, posecheck 0.5+ (optional).

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Pose Validation

Test docked or AI-generated protein-ligand poses for physical plausibility. PoseBusters (Buttenschoen et al. 2024) provides geometric, chemical, and energetic checks that flag implausible poses, including non-planar aromatic rings, van der Waals clashes, broken bonds, altered stereochemistry, and unfavorable internal energies. On the Astex Diverse Set, DiffDock achieved 72% RMSD success but only 47% combined RMSD-and-PB-valid success; the size of this gap is dataset- and method-dependent. PB-valid status complements RMSD for downstream SAR, FEP setup, or generative-model training.

For docking, see chemoinformatics/virtual-screening. For ML docking specifically, see chemoinformatics/ml-docking-rescoring.

PoseBusters Test Suite

PoseBusters runs ~20 individual checks grouped into:

The thresholds below are the benchmark criteria reported by Buttenschoen et al. (2024). Installed PoseBusters defaults may differ by version and configuration, so record the package version and resolved configuration.

Check groupWhat it tests2024 benchmark criterion
SanityLigand chemical sanityRDKit sanitization passes
Bond lengthsBond lengths within reference0.75–1.25 times RDKit distance-geometry bounds
Bond angles1–3 distances within reference0.75–1.25 times RDKit distance-geometry bounds
Internal stericNo intra-ligand clashPair distance > 0.70 times the RDKit lower bound
Aromatic ring planarityAromatic rings planarMaximum deviation from fitted plane <= 0.25 Å
Double-bond stereoZ/E preservedMatch input SMILES
Internal energyEnergy relative to generated conformersUFF energy ratio <= 100 versus the mean of 50 generated, relaxed conformers
Volume overlapvdW overlap with protein< 7.5% of ligand vdW volume
Minimum distanceNo severe protein-ligand clashDistance >= 0.75 times the sum of vdW radii
ChiralityR/S preserved from inputMatch input SMILES

A pose passing ALL tests is "PB-valid". Combined PB-valid + RMSD <= 2 Å is the modern criterion.

When to Apply PoseBusters

WorkflowPoseBusters useAction
Self-docking (validating method)RequiredCompare PB-valid + RMSD <= 2A
Cross-dockingRequiredPB-valid + RMSD <= 2A; account for protein flexibility
Virtual screening top hitsRequiredFilter to PB-valid before MM/GBSA / FEP
AI docking (DiffDock, etc.)Required for a fair benchmarkReport the dataset-specific PB-valid and combined success rates
Generated ligand posesRecommendedMeasure chemical and geometric validity rather than assuming it
Boltz-2 / AlphaFold3 ligand posesRecommendedBenchmark validity on the relevant complexes; do not infer a failure frequency from DiffDock
Production FEP setupRequiredInspect pose validity and ligand strain before system preparation

PoseBusters Usage

from posebusters import PoseBusters

bust = PoseBusters(config='redock')

results = bust.bust(
    mol_pred='predicted.sdf',
    mol_true='reference.sdf',
    mol_cond='receptor.pdb',
)

Common configurations and their included checks are:

ConfigIncludesWhen to use
redockAll checks + RMSD vs reference + protein vdW overlapSelf-docking benchmarks, retrospective validation
dockAll checks except RMSD referenceBlind docking, prospective virtual screening
molIntra-ligand only (sanity, bonds, angles, rings, stereo, energy)Conformer QC; no protein context

PoseBusters also ships additional and faster configurations in some releases. Treat the table as a workflow guide, not an exhaustive registry, and inspect the configurations available in the installed version.

Output: a DataFrame with one row per pose, metadata columns, and boolean pass/fail columns for the checks enabled by the selected configuration. Reference-dependent fields such as RMSD and the exact check-column names vary by configuration and version; inspect results.columns rather than relying on a fixed exhaustive list.

Python Library API

Goal: Programmatically validate a docked-pose SDF against a receptor PDB and produce a PB-valid filter.

Approach: Instantiate PoseBusters(config='dock'), call bust() on the SDF + PDB pair, and AND-aggregate all boolean check columns into a single pb_valid flag.

from posebusters import PoseBusters
import pandas as pd

bust = PoseBusters(config='dock')

results = bust.bust(
    mol_pred='/path/to/docked_poses.sdf',
    mol_cond='/path/to/receptor.pdb',
)

check_cols = [
    col for col in results.select_dtypes(include='bool').columns
    if not col.lower().startswith('rmsd')
]
results['pb_valid'] = results[check_cols].all(axis=1)
valid = results[results['pb_valid']]
print(f'{len(valid)} / {len(results)} poses are PB-valid')

Strain Energy Quantification

Beyond binary PB-valid, quantitative strain energy distinguishes "marginal" from "egregious" poses.

Goal: Quantify how far each docked pose is from its lowest-energy free conformer in MMFF94 energy units.

Approach: Generate a reference conformer ensemble (ETKDGv3 + MMFF94), make the docked and reference molecules chemically consistent by adding explicit hydrogens to both, relax only the added docked-pose hydrogens while fixing all heavy atoms, take the lowest sampled reference energy as baseline, and report docked_energy - min_ref_energy as a relative strain diagnostic. This is not a rigorous solution-phase conformational free energy.

from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import AllChem

def ligand_strain(docked_sdf, n_ref=20):
    suppl = Chem.SDMolSupplier(docked_sdf, removeHs=False)
    strains = []
    for docked in suppl:
        if docked is None:
            continue

        smi = Chem.MolToSmiles(docked)
        ref = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
        if ref is None:
            strains.append({'strain': None, 'note': 'reference_parse_failed'})
            continue
        ref = Chem.AddHs(ref)
        props_ref = AllChem.MMFFGetMoleculeProperties(ref)
        if props_ref is None:
            strains.append({'strain': None, 'note': 'no_reference_mmff_parameters'})
            continue
        conf_ids = list(AllChem.EmbedMultipleConfs(
            ref, numConfs=n_ref, params=AllChem.ETKDGv3()
        ))
        if not conf_ids:
            strains.append({'strain': None, 'note': 'reference_embedding_failed'})
            continue
        AllChem.MMFFOptimizeMoleculeConfs(ref)

        ref_energies = []
        for c in conf_ids:
            ff = AllChem.MMFFGetMoleculeForceField(
                ref, props_ref, confId=c
            )
            if ff is not None:
                ref_energies.append(ff.CalcEnergy())
        if not ref_energies:
            strains.append({'strain': None, 'note': 'reference_force_field_failed'})
            continue
        min_ref = min(ref_energies)

        # MMFF energies are comparable only for the same explicit atom system.
        # Add any missing H coordinates, then relax H atoms while preserving the
        # docked heavy-atom pose.
        docked_h = Chem.AddHs(Chem.Mol(docked), addCoords=True)
        if docked_h.GetNumAtoms() != ref.GetNumAtoms():
            strains.append({'strain': None, 'note': 'atom_system_mismatch'})
            continue
        props_docked = AllChem.MMFFGetMoleculeProperties(docked_h)
        docked_ff = AllChem.MMFFGetMoleculeForceField(
            docked_h, props_docked
        ) if props_docked is not None else None
        if docked_ff is not None:
            for atom in docked_h.GetAtoms():
                if atom.GetAtomicNum() != 1:
                    docked_ff.AddFixedPoint(atom.GetIdx())
            docked_ff.Minimize(maxIts=200)
        docked_e = docked_ff.CalcEnergy() if docked_ff else None

        strains.append({
            'min_ref_energy': min_ref,
            'docked_energy': docked_e,
            'strain': docked_e - min_ref if docked_e is not None else None,
            'note': 'ok' if docked_e is not None else 'docked_force_field_failed',
        })
    return strains

Interpret relative MMFF strain in the context of ligand chemistry, conformer-sampling coverage, and force-field support. Boström et al. (1998) found a conformational energy penalty of no more than 3 kcal/mol for about 70% of 33 protein-bound ligands; that result does not establish a universal acceptance cutoff. Treat unusually high values as a prompt for inspection or use a project-defined threshold validated for the series.

vdW Overlap with Protein

The 2024 benchmark criterion limits protein-ligand overlap to 7.5% of the ligand vdW volume, using protein radii scaled by 0.8. PoseBusters' bust(...) computes this check; do not substitute an unvalidated pairwise-distance sketch for its volume calculation.

Aromatic Ring Planarity

import numpy as np

def aromatic_planarity(mol):
    deviations = []
    for ring in mol.GetRingInfo().AtomRings():
        ring_atoms = [mol.GetAtomWithIdx(i) for i in ring]
        if not all(a.GetIsAromatic() for a in ring_atoms):
            continue
        coords = np.array([mol.GetConformer().GetAtomPosition(i)
                          for i in ring])
        centroid = coords.mean(axis=0)
        centered = coords - centroid
        _, s, vh = np.linalg.svd(centered)
        normal = vh[-1]
        deviation = np.abs(centered @ normal).max()
        deviations.append(deviation)
    return max(deviations) if deviations else 0

Aromatic ring deviation > 0.25 Å is implausible; flag.

Model-Specific Failure Diagnosis

Do not assign a mechanism from the model name or a failed PoseBusters column alone. For DiffDock-L, EquiBind, TANKBind, Boltz, AlphaFold3, or another pose generator, report the observed failed checks on the evaluated dataset, inspect the structures, and compare against the method's documented constraints. A chirality, planarity, bond-geometry, or clash failure may justify filtering or a validated constrained-relaxation protocol, but relaxation must be checked for displacement of the binding mode.

High strain after Vina docking

Trigger: Highly constrained pocket; flexible ligand.

Symptom: Relative strain is an outlier for the chemical series even though the pose passes the enabled geometric checks.

Fix: Inspect conformer-sampling coverage and force-field support. Compare additional docking or constrained-relaxation settings under a project-validated protocol rather than applying a universal strain or exhaustiveness cutoff.

Reconciliation: PoseBusters vs RMSD

RMSD <= 2APB-validAction
YesYesPhysically plausible and close to the reference; still validate suitability for the downstream task
YesNoClose to the reference but fails an enabled plausibility check; inspect the failure and any validated relaxation
NoYesPhysically plausible but different from the reference; investigate alignment, protein state, and alternative binding modes
NoNoDifferent from the reference and fails an enabled plausibility check; inspect both causes before deciding whether to reject

On the Astex Diverse Set reported by Buttenschoen et al. (2024), DiffDock's top-pose success fell from 72% by RMSD <= 2 Å alone to 47% when PB-validity was also required: a 25-percentage-point gap. Do not generalize that result to a fixed failure rate on other datasets.

Integration into VS Pipeline

import pandas as pd
from posebusters import PoseBusters

def pose_qc_pipeline(docked_sdfs, receptor_pdb):
    bust = PoseBusters(config='dock')
    all_results = []
    for sdf in docked_sdfs:
        r = bust.bust(mol_pred=sdf, mol_cond=receptor_pdb)
        check_cols = [
            col for col in r.select_dtypes(include='bool').columns
            if not col.lower().startswith('rmsd')
        ]
        r['pb_valid'] = r[check_cols].all(axis=1)
        r['source'] = sdf
        all_results.append(r)
    df = pd.concat(all_results)

    df['rank'] = df.groupby('source')['pb_valid'].cumsum()
    valid_top = df[df['pb_valid']].groupby('source').head(1)
    return valid_top

Common Errors

SymptomCauseFix
Rows or expected checks are missingInput loading failed or the selected configuration omits those checksInspect the returned DataFrame, loading-status columns, input format, and installed configuration
RMSD not computedNo reference providedPass mol_true parameter
All checks pass for invalid poseWrong receptor file formatUse PDB with hydrogens; PDBQT may not work
vdW overlap false positive on covalentCovalent bond counted as clashUse covalent docking-specific validation
Strain calculation slowToo many reference conformersReduce n_ref to 5-10
PoseBusters config errorWrong or version-incompatible config nameInspect the installed configuration registry; redock, dock, and mol are common configurations
posecheck unavailableDifferent tool, similar purposepip install posecheck for alternative

References

  • Buttenschoen M, Morris GM, Deane CM. "PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences." Chem. Sci. 15:3130–3139 (2024). DOI: 10.1039/D3SC04185A.
  • Boström J, Norrby PO, Liljefors T. "Conformational energy penalties of protein-bound ligands." J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 12:383–396 (1998). DOI: 10.1023/A:1008007507641.
  • Corso G et al. "DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking." ICLR (2023). OpenReview: https://openreview.net/forum?id=kKF8_K-mBbS.
  • Stärk H et al. "EquiBind: Geometric Deep Learning for Drug Binding Structure Prediction." PMLR 162:20503–20521 (2022). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/stark22b.html.
  • Lu W et al. "TankBind: Trigonometry-Aware Neural NetworKs for Drug-Protein Binding Structure Prediction." NeurIPS 35 (2022). Official repository: https://github.com/luwei0917/TankBind.
  • Abramson J et al. "Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3." Nature 630:493–500 (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w.
  • Boltz official repository and documentation: https://github.com/jwohlwend/boltz.
  • PoseBusters documentation, Python API: https://posebusters.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html.

Related Skills

  • chemoinformatics/virtual-screening - Source of poses to validate
  • chemoinformatics/ml-docking-rescoring - DiffDock, EquiBind, TANKBind validation
  • chemoinformatics/molecular-io - SDF format handling
  • chemoinformatics/conformer-generation - Generate reference conformer ensemble for strain
  • chemoinformatics/free-energy-calculations - PoseBusters-valid poses for FEP input
  • chemoinformatics/covalent-design - Covalent pose validation

What ships with it: 2 files

7.6 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable

examples/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,069. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.