Arxiv space paper to brief

Skill frankxai/starlight-agent-skills/skills/cosmos/arxiv-space-paper-to-brief

Portable Starlight substrate skills for agent runtimes, SIS, ACOS, and cross-agent workflow activation.

Install

npx -y skills add frankxai/starlight-agent-skills --skill arxiv-space-paper-to-brief

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Turn an astrophysics/space-science arXiv paper into a structured brief tuned for space audiences — adds object/mission context, instruments, and observational caveats. Use when summarizing an astro-ph paper, a space-science result, or a mission's published findings.

SKILL.md

2.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

arXiv Space Paper → Brief

An astro-ph paper → a structured brief with the context space readers need.

Purpose

The space-tuned sibling of ../../research/arxiv-paper-to-brief. Same rigor, plus the context astrophysics readers expect: which objects/missions, which instruments, and the observational caveats (selection effects, calibration, model assumptions) that determine how much to trust a result.

When it fires

Keyword triggers: astro-ph, astrophysics paper, space paper, observation paper, mission result
File triggers: papers/astro/**, *.pdf
Command triggers: /arxiv-space-paper-to-brief

Inputs

Input	Required	Notes
`paper`	yes	arXiv URL/ID, PDF, or text.
`audience`	no	`astronomer` (default), `enthusiast`, `general`.

Workflow

Metadata + identifier — title, authors, date, arXiv ID. ✅ Check: ID captured.
Object/mission context — what was observed and with which facility/instrument.
Problem + method — faithful to the paper.
Results — each tied to a figure/table; claimed vs. demonstrated separated.
Observational caveats — selection effects, calibration, sample size, model dependence. Be candid — this is where space results are over-read.
Why it matters — for the chosen audience.
Citations — exact quotes/figures with locations.

Output contract

{
  "metadata": { "title": "string", "authors": "string", "id": "string", "date": "string" },
  "context": { "objects": ["string"], "instruments": ["string"] },
  "problem": "string",
  "method": "string",
  "results": [{ "claim": "string", "evidence": "string" }],
  "caveats": ["string — observational/statistical"],
  "why_it_matters": "string",
  "citations": ["string"]
}

Tools & MCP

Tools: WebFetch, Read. MCP: optional docs/library MCP.

Quality bar

Instruments/objects named correctly.
Observational caveats are substantive, not generic.
Results tied to figures/tables; identifier correct.

Example

Input: an astro-ph exoplanet-atmosphere paper → brief with the telescope/instrument, the detection claim tied to a figure, and caveats on signal-to-noise and model assumptions.

Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.0 Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, sovereignty] Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer