Diagnose clickhouse clusters
Skill FrankChen021/datastoria/resources/skills/diagnose-clickhouse-clusters
AI-native ClickHouse console for your cluster diagnostics and query generation, optimization and data visualization.
npx -y skills add FrankChen021/datastoria --skill diagnose-clickhouse-clustersAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Diagnose ClickHouse cluster health and provide concrete remediation.
SKILL.md
6.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Tool Usage Rules
- Call
collect_cluster_statusbefore health conclusions about current cluster health. - For RCA questions, call
collect_rca_evidencedirectly when the symptom and target are already clear. Usecollect_cluster_statusfirst only when you need current health context, severity/outliers, or help choosing the RCA symptom/scope. - Use only supported Phase 1 RCA symptoms:
high_part_countandunknown. - For bounded-time questions, use
status_analysis_mode="windowed"and reuse the same time window in follow-up calls. - If user asks for a chart, use the
visualizationskill. Do not emit chart specs directly from this skill. - Do not invent custom health-check SQL. Use tool outputs as the source of truth.
Workflow (MANDATORY)
- Determine whether the user asks for status only, or root cause ("why", "root cause", "reason", "caused by", "explain").
- For RCA questions, pick one supported canonical symptom key based on user wording, explicit target details, and, when needed, status findings.
- Explain from tool output only: top candidates, support score, evidence lists, gaps, and prioritized actions.
Severity Thresholds (Guidance)
- CRITICAL: replication lag > 300s, disk usage > 90%
- WARNING: replication lag > 60s, disk usage > 80%
- OK: metrics within normal ranges
Do not hardcode parts thresholds in responses. Use the thresholds and severities returned by collect_cluster_status.
Output Format (MANDATORY)
Use one of these two formats:
A) Status-only question
-
Summary table: Always print a table title line exactly before the table:
### Summary.Status Nodes with Issues Checks Run Timestamp π’ OK / π WARNING / π΄ CRITICAL N categories ISO8601 -
Findings by category: Always print a table title line exactly before the table:
### Findings by Category. Use a markdown table (not bullets) with one row per category. Required columns:Category Status Key Metrics Top Outlier / Scope Notes parts / errors / replication / ... π’ OK / π WARNING / π΄ CRITICAL concise metric values with thresholds node/table if present, else -one short phrase Table rules:
- Include all categories returned by
collect_cluster_statusin stable order. - Status must include both emoji and text (for example
π WARNING), never emoji-only. - Markdown table cells do not reliably support line breaks in this UI. Do not try to render multi-line bullets in a cell.
- In
Key Metrics, put the 1-2 most important metrics only (single-line, semicolon-separated if needed). - Put additional metrics in
Notesas compact key/value items (single-line). - Put numeric values first (for example
max_parts_per_table=533 (>500)), avoid prose-heavy sentences. - Always wrap database/table identifiers in backticks (for example
`db.table`or`db`) in all table cells. - If category has sub-findings (for example top errors), keep them in
Notesas compact comma-separated items. - If no outlier exists, set
Top Outlier / Scopeto-.
- Include all categories returned by
-
Recommendations (max 3 items; each item = title + why + concrete SQL/command if needed).
B) RCA question ("why", "cause", "reason", "explain")
Use compact structure only:
- RCA Verdict: one sentence, max 30 words.
- Top Candidates: markdown table with max 3 rows:
cause | support_score | evidence. Inevidence, render up to 3evidence_foritems prefixed withβand up to 2evidence_againstitems prefixed withβ, separated by<br/>. Whenexcluded_candidatesis non-empty, include at least one excluded reason as aβitem for the most relevant row. Evidence fidelity rules:- Use only
candidate.evidence_forandcandidate.evidence_againstfromcollect_rca_evidencefor that row. - Do not pull extra lines from top-level
observations, other candidates, or status output into the evidence cell. - Do not restate raw metrics unless they already appear inside
candidate.evidence_fororcandidate.evidence_against. - Preserve the candidate/tool counts: if helpful, you may mention
indicators_matched/indicators_checked, but never imply more matched checks than the tool returned.
- Use only
- Possible Actions: max 3 numbered items, sorted by impact.
Formatting rule: print the line
3. **Possible Actions**, then a blank line, then an indented nested numbered list using exactly1.,2.,3.. Do not continue the outer top-level numbering for action items. - Gaps / Next Checks: max 2 bullets.
Formatting rule: print the line
4. **Gaps / Next Checks**, then a blank line, then indented bullets using exactly-.
RCA brevity limits:
- Keep total RCA response under 220 words (excluding SQL command blocks).
- Do not add long background/theory paragraphs.
- Use direct statements and numeric evidence.
Critical Rules
- ALWAYS call
collect_cluster_statusbefore giving any opinion on current health. - Use
status_analysis_mode="windowed"when user asks for a bounded time window or historical context. - For RCA questions, MUST call
collect_rca_evidence.collect_cluster_statusis optional unless current health context is needed. - Do NOT state root causes without RCA evidence output.
- If
gaps[]is non-empty, explicitly state what evidence is missing. - If all candidates have
support_score < 0.3, state that the RCA is inconclusive and use candidatenext_checksplusgapsto explain what to inspect next. - If best candidate is weak (
0.30-0.39), present it as a possibility with caveats and emphasize candidatenext_checks. - Never fabricate or merge evidence lines across candidates. Candidate rows must be traceable directly to that candidate's
evidence_forandevidence_against. - If
collect_rca_evidence.related_symptomsis non-empty, include a lineRelated symptoms:and list them. - When follow-up questions omit time range, reuse the most recent explicit time window/range from prior turns.
- Never assume schema or table names; use only what tools return.
- Do not invent custom health-check SQL; use tool outputs as source of truth.
- Be concise and focus on remediation, not theory.