Reporting shared defects
Skill FlyFission/nuclear-grade-context-engineering/skills/reporting-shared-defects
Routes a defect found in a shared or supplied artifact (a shared prompt, skill, dependency, model, eval, or template) to the downstream teams, agents, and releases that depend on it, not just a local fix. Use when a discovered defect affects others who consume the same artifact. Do not use for a defect local to your own change, which is an ordinary fix, or for a live incident still being contained.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add FlyFission/nuclear-grade-context-engineering --skill reporting-shared-defectsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
6.6 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Reporting Shared Defects
Overview
A defect you find in something other people use is two problems, not one. The first is the bug itself, which you fix. The second is that every other consumer of that shared or supplied artifact still carries it and does not know. Fixing your own copy and moving on leaves them exposed. This skill makes the outward notice a first-class obligation alongside the local fix, so a defect in a shared prompt, skill, dependency, model, eval, or template reaches the teams, agents, and releases that depend on it.
Decision contract
- Claim checked: a defect found in a shared or supplied artifact has been evaluated for downstream impact and either notified to the affected consumers with an owner and a tracking link, or recorded as not-reportable with a reason -- never fixed locally and forgotten.
- Artifact observed: the defect, the shared or supplied artifact it lives in, and who consumes it -> a shared-defect report (description, affected consumers, severity, notice sent, owner, link) tied to the OPEX record and the deficiency register.
- Decision affected: block -- whether downstream consumers are notified (the local fix is not complete until they are), or the defect is recorded as not-reportable with a reason.
- Failure class: silent-local-fix (a defect in a shared artifact patched in one place while other consumers keep carrying it, unnotified).
- Next action: evaluate downstream impact and notify the affected consumers or owners; escalate when the defect touches security, data integrity, credentials, privacy, or a public release.
When to Use
- You found a defect in something others also use: a shared prompt, skill, command, template, dependency pin, model identifier, eval harness, or config.
- A fix you are about to make corrects your own copy but leaves other consumers exposed.
- An incident or OPEX lesson traced the cause to a shared or supplied artifact.
When Not to Use
- The defect is local to your own change and affects no other consumer; that is an ordinary fix.
- A live incident still needs containment first -- stabilize with
responding-to-incidents, then report. - The artifact has no other consumers, and none are foreseeable.
Inputs
- The defect, where it lives, and how it was found.
- The shared or supplied artifact and its consumers: teams, agents, releases, downstream repos.
- The severity, and how it could fail for a consumer who does not know about it.
- Any related incident, OPEX lesson, or deficiency entry, and the local fix already made.
Process
- Confirm the defect lives in a shared or supplied artifact, not only in your own copy.
- Evaluate downstream impact: who consumes it, and how it could fail for a consumer who does not know -- separate an honest defect from a non-issue.
- Make the local fix, but do not treat the work as done: the local fix and the outward notice are separate obligations.
- Notify the affected consumers or owners with the defect, its severity, and the fix or workaround; give the notice an owner and a tracking link.
- Record the report and tie it to the OPEX record (
learning-from-experience) and the deficiency register (tracking-deficiencies) so it does not vanish. - If the defect cannot reach others, record that judgment with its reason instead of sending a notice.
Outputs
- A shared-defect report: description, affected consumers, severity, notice sent (to whom, when), owner, and tracking link.
- The local fix, plus the outward notice or a recorded reason none was needed.
- Links to the OPEX record and the deficiency entry.
Verification
- Every reportable defect has a notice to named consumers, an owner, and a tracking link -- not just a local patch.
- Not-reportable calls record the reason and who decided.
- The report links to the OPEX and deficiency records, so the duty is auditable.
Escalation
- Escalate when the shared defect touches security, credentials, data integrity, privacy, or a public release.
- Require a qualified or independent reviewer when the consumers are external, or the defect could cause a substantial downstream failure.
- Stop and report upward when no one will own the outward notice.
Common Rationalizations
- "I fixed it in my repo." Your copy is fixed; every other consumer still carries it.
- "They will pull the update eventually." Silent propagation is not notification -- name them and tell them.
- "It is probably fine for the others." That is a judgment to record with a reason, not an assumption to skip.
Red Flags
- A shared prompt, skill, dependency, or model defect fixed in one place with no notice to other consumers.
- A report with no named consumers, no owner, or no tracking link.
- A "known issue" in a shared artifact living in chat or memory instead of a routed notice.
Prompt
Route a Nuclear-grade shared-defect report.
Inputs:
- defect and where it lives:
- shared or supplied artifact (prompt/skill/command/template/dependency/model/eval/config):
- consumers (teams, agents, releases, downstream repos):
- severity and how it fails for a consumer who does not know:
- local fix already made:
- related incident / OPEX / deficiency:
Return:
- a confirmation the defect lives in a shared or supplied artifact, not just your copy
- the downstream impact: who is affected and how
- the outward notice: to whom, what they need to do, the owner, and a tracking link
- the tie to the OPEX record and the deficiency register
- or, if it cannot reach others, the recorded reason no notice is needed
- escalation when security, credentials, data integrity, privacy, or a public release is touched
Treat the local fix and the outward notice as separate obligations. Do not imply formal assurance, compliance, or regulatory adequacy.
Source-lineage note
This skill is an original software-workflow translation of the evaluate-and-notify duty for defects in supplied or shared items, informed by 10 CFR Part 21 (§21.21) as public source lineage and grounded in the operating-experience and corrective-action habits in DOE-HDBK-1028-2009, mapped in docs/00-standards-foundation/source-map.md. It does not create DOE, NRC, or any compliance, formal assurance, safety, security, certification, or regulatory adequacy.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most docs writing skills give in ~1.4k tokens
Counted across 1,951 of the 3,904 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Use third-person for skill descriptionsin 54 of 1951, across 35 files
- Start descriptions with Use whenin 43 of 1951, across 29 files
- Run baseline scenarios before writing any skillin 40 of 1951, across 26 files
- Use active voicein 40 of 1951, across 36 files
- Map file responsibilities before defining tasksin 36 of 1951, across 29 files
- Use checkbox syntax for tracking stepsin 35 of 1951, across 27 files
- Ask one question at a timein 35 of 1951
- Offer execution options after saving the planin 33 of 1951, across 24 files
- Include complete code in every stepin 33 of 1951, across 27 files
- Design units with clear boundaries and interfacesin 31 of 1951, across 23 files
- Announce the skill usage at the startin 30 of 1951
- Verify agent compliance after adding the skillin 29 of 1951, across 17 files
Said here and by no other author read
- confirm the defect exists in a shared artifact
- evaluate downstream impact on all consumers
- perform the local fix
- notify all affected consumers or owners
- assign an owner and tracking link to the notice
- record the report in the deficiency register
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.