agentsclimarketplace

Oma search

Skill first-fluke/oh-my-agent/generated/agent-skills/oma-search

Intent-based search router with trust scoring. Routes queries to optimal channels (Context7 docs, native web search, gh/glab code search, Serena local) and attaches domain trust labels. Use for search, find, lookup, reference, docs, code search, and web research.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add first-fluke/oh-my-agent --skill oma-search

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

7.9 KB, ~1.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Search Agent - Intent-Based Search Router

Scheduling

Goal

Classify information-seeking requests, route them to the best search channel, attach trust labels, and return source-grounded results.

Intent signature

  • User asks to search, find, look up, reference docs, inspect official documentation, search GitHub/GitLab code, or gather web research.
  • Another skill needs reusable search infrastructure with trust scoring.

When to use

  • Finding official library/framework documentation
  • Web research for tutorials, examples, comparisons, and solutions
  • Searching GitHub/GitLab code for implementation patterns
  • Any query where the search channel is unclear (auto-routing)
  • Other skills needing search infrastructure (shared invocation)

When NOT to use

  • Local codebase exploration only -> use Serena MCP directly
  • Git history or blame analysis -> use SCM Agent
  • Full architecture research -> use Architecture Agent (may invoke this skill internally)

Expected inputs

  • Query string, intent hint, or explicit flags such as --docs, --code, --web, --strict, --wide, --gitlab
  • Optional required source type, recency, domain, or trust constraints

Expected outputs

  • Ranked search results with route, source, trust label, and concise relevance summary
  • Fallback explanation when primary route fails
  • Source links or references suitable for the calling skill

Dependencies

  • Context7 MCP for docs, runtime-native web search, gh/glab for code, Serena for local search
  • resources/intent-rules.md, resources/trust-registry.md, execution protocol, examples, and checklist

Control-flow features

  • Branches by classified intent, user flags, route success/failure, and trust constraints
  • May call web/docs/code/local tools
  • Scores domains at domain level only

Structural Flow

Entry

  1. Parse the query and flags.
  2. Classify the search intent.
  3. Select one best route unless ambiguity or flags justify more.

Scenes

  1. PREPARE: Parse query and classify route.
  2. ACT: Dispatch to docs, web, code, or local search.
  3. ACQUIRE: Collect search results and source metadata.
  4. VERIFY: Apply trust scoring and route-specific quality checks.
  5. FINALIZE: Present ranked results or fallback status.

Transitions

  • If --docs, --code, --web, --strict, --wide, or --gitlab is provided, flags override classifier.
  • If docs route fails, fall back to web.
  • If web search needs fetch escalation, use oma search fetch strategies.
  • If query is purely local, use Serena MCP instead of web.

Failure and recovery

  • If primary route fails, fall forward to the next appropriate route.
  • If trust score is weak, label it instead of hiding uncertainty.
  • If no reliable results exist, report that and suggest a narrower query.

Exit

  • Success: results are routed, trust-scored, and source-grounded.
  • Partial success: route failures or trust limitations are explicit.

Logical Operations

Actions

ActionSSL primitiveEvidence
Parse query and flagsREADUser request
Classify intentSELECTIntent rules
Dispatch search routeCALL_TOOLDocs, web, code, local tools
Collect resultsREADSearch outputs
Score trustVALIDATETrust registry
Rank and formatINFERRelevance and trust
Report resultsNOTIFYFinal answer

Tools and instruments

  • Context7 docs tools
  • Runtime-native web search
  • oma search CLI primitives: fetch, code, trust, api, api:search, meta, rss, rss:google, media, archive, doctor
  • Serena MCP for local project search

Canonical command path

oma search code "<query>" [--host gitlab] [--language <lang>] [--repo <owner/repo>]
oma search trust <domain>
oma search fetch <url>

For docs and web routes, use the runtime's available official-docs or web-search tools after classifying intent; do not duplicate routes unless the intent is ambiguous.

Resource scope

ScopeResource target
NETWORKWeb/docs/source-code search targets
CODEBASELocal files when local search is selected
PROCESSgh, glab, and CLI search commands
MEMORYQuery classification, trust labels, selected results

Preconditions

  • Query and route constraints are clear enough to classify.
  • Required search tools are available or fallback is possible.

Effects and side effects

  • Performs external searches or local code searches.
  • Produces ranked references that may influence downstream implementation or research.

Guardrails

  1. Classify intent before searching: every query goes through IntentClassifier first
  2. One query, one best route: avoid redundant multi-route unless intent is ambiguous
  3. Trust score every result: all non-local results get domain trust labels via oma search trust <domain> (single source: cli/commands/search/trust.ts)
  4. Flags override classifier: user-provided flags (--docs, --code, --web, --strict, --wide, --gitlab) always take precedence
  5. Fail forward: if primary route fails, fall back gracefully (docs->web, web->oma search fetch strategies)
  6. No additional MCP required: Context7 for docs, runtime native for web, CLI for code, Serena for local
  7. Vendor-agnostic web search: use whatever the current runtime provides (WebSearch, Google, Bing)
  8. Domain-level trust only: do not attempt sub-path or page-level scoring

Routes

RoutePrimary ToolFallbackTrigger
docsContext7 MCP (resolve-library-idquery-docs)web routeOfficial docs, API reference
webRuntime native searchoma search fetch (api/probe/impersonate/browser)Tutorials, examples, solutions
codeoma search code (wraps gh / glab)(none)Implementation patterns, repos
localSerena MCP (delegate)(none)Current project files, symbols

Default Workflow

  1. Parse: Extract query, detect flags, classify intent
  2. Route: Dispatch to the appropriate search channel(s)
  3. Collect: Gather results from dispatched routes
  4. Score: Attach trust labels to each result domain
  5. Present: Format and rank results for the user

Invocation

Standalone

/oma-search "React Server Components streaming"
/oma-search --docs "Next.js middleware"
/oma-search --code "PKCE implementation"
/oma-search --strict "JWT refresh token rotation"

Shared Infrastructure (from other skills)

Other skills reference oma-search by specifying intent and query:

  1. State intent: docs | web | code | local
  2. Pass query string
  3. Use Trust Score in results to weigh source reliability

References

Follow resources/execution-protocol.md step by step. See resources/examples.md for input/output examples. Use resources/intent-rules.md for intent classification reference. Use resources/trust-registry.md for domain trust scoring reference. Before submitting, run resources/checklist.md. Vendor-specific execution protocols are injected automatically by oma agent:spawn. Source files live under ../_shared/runtime/execution-protocols/{vendor}.md.

  • Execution steps: resources/execution-protocol.md
  • Intent classification: resources/intent-rules.md
  • Trust registry: resources/trust-registry.md
  • Examples: resources/examples.md
  • Checklist: resources/checklist.md
  • Error recovery: resources/error-playbook.md
  • Context loading: ../_shared/core/context-loading.md
  • Context budget: ../_shared/core/context-budget.md
  • Lessons learned: ../_shared/core/lessons-learned.md

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most web research skills give in ~1.8k tokens

Counted across 292 of the 300 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Use web_search_exa for current information and broad discoveryin 22 of 292, across 8 files
  • Cite every claim with a sourcein 21 of 292, across 18 files
  • Configure the Exa MCP server with an API keyin 18 of 292, across 5 files
  • Use get_code_context_exa for code examples and API docsin 16 of 292, across 6 files
  • Verify exact tool names before depending on themin 13 of 292, across 4 files
  • Narrow results with site:, quoted phrase, and intitle: operatorsin 13 of 292, across 4 files
  • Adjust tokensNum lower for snippets, higher for full contextin 13 of 292, across 4 files
  • Break the topic into 3-5 research sub-questionsin 13 of 292
  • Confirm current Exa docs and exposed tool surface before usein 11 of 292, across 2 files
  • Get user confirmation after Phase 1in 10 of 292, across 9 files
  • Prefer primary sources when availablein 10 of 292
  • Verify extracted metadata against original sourcesin 9 of 292, across 5 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Parse the query and detect flags
  • Classify the search intent before searching
  • Select one best route per query
  • Let user flags override the classifier
  • Dispatch to docs, web, code, or local search
  • Attach trust labels to every non-local result

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.