Aso reviews
Skill FelixGraeber/claude-aso-audit-skill/skills/aso-reviews
ASO audit skill pack for Claude Code: audit App Store and Google Play listings, keywords, metadata, visuals, reviews, and competitors.
npx -y skills add FelixGraeber/claude-aso-audit-skill --skill aso-reviewsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review and rating analysis for app store listings. Sentiment classification, keyword extraction from reviews, theme clustering, rating distribution, developer response strategy. Triggers on: "reviews", "ratings", "sentiment", "review response".
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
ASO Reviews — Review & Rating Management
Capabilities
- Rating distribution and trend analysis
- Sentiment classification (positive/neutral/negative)
- Theme clustering (performance, UI, features, pricing, bugs, support)
- Keyword extraction from review text (Android: reviews are indexed!)
- Developer response strategy and templates
- Review velocity assessment
Process
- Fetch reviews (from listing data or user-provided JSON)
- Run sentiment analysis:
uv run python scripts/review_analyzer.py --file reviews.json --json - Extract keyword themes
- Analyze rating distribution
- Generate response templates for negative reviews
Scoring (0-100)
| Factor | Weight | Thresholds |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 30% | <3.5=Critical, 3.5-3.9=Poor, 4.0-4.4=Good, 4.5+=Excellent |
| Rating volume | 20% | <100=Low credibility, 100-1000=Moderate, >1000=Strong |
| Sentiment ratio | 20% | >70% positive=Good, 50-70%=Fair, <50%=Poor |
| Rating velocity | 15% | Improving trend=bonus, declining=penalty |
| Response rate | 15% | >80%=Excellent, 50-80%=Good, <50%=Needs work |
Platform-Specific Impact
iOS
- Reviews affect ranking via rating signals only
- Review TEXT is NOT indexed for search
- Developer responses shown prominently — build trust
- Rating resets possible with major version updates
Android
- Review TEXT IS INDEXED — keywords in reviews impact search visibility
- Keywords from reviews can boost rankings for mentioned features
- Encourage reviews that mention key use cases
- No rating reset option
Response Strategy: HEAR Framework
- Hear — Acknowledge the specific concern
- Empathize — Show understanding
- Act — Describe what you're doing about it
- Resolve — Provide next steps or solution
Response Templates
1-2 star (bug/crash):
Thank you for reporting this. We've identified the [specific issue] and our team is working on a fix for the next update. Please contact us at [email] if you need immediate help.
1-2 star (feature request):
We appreciate your feedback about [feature]. This is on our roadmap and we're actively working on it. We'll keep you updated.
3 star (mixed):
Thanks for the detailed feedback! We're glad [positive aspect] is working well. We hear you on [negative aspect] and are improving it in upcoming updates.
4-5 star:
Thank you for the kind words! We're thrilled you enjoy [specific feature]. Your support means a lot to our team.
Output Format
# Review Analysis: [App Name]
## Rating Health
- Average: X.X/5.0
- Distribution: [histogram]
- Volume: X total reviews
- Velocity: X reviews/week
## Sentiment Analysis
- Positive: X%
- Neutral: X%
- Negative: X%
## Top Themes
| Theme | Mentions | Sentiment | Key Quotes |
|-------|----------|-----------|------------|
## Keyword Opportunities (from reviews)
[Keywords frequently mentioned that could inform metadata]
## Recommended Response Actions
[Prioritized list of reviews to respond to]
Available Tools
Read, Bash, Write, Glob, Grep