agentsclimarketplace

Legal 5step framework

Skill fedec65/bettercallclaude/bettercallclaude/skills/legal-5step-framework

A powerful plugin for Claude Cowork Desktop, designed specifically for Swiss legal professionals. 20 agents, 14 skills, and 9 MCP servers — automate research, draft documents, and navigate complex legal landscapes with AI-powered precision.

Install
npx -y skills add fedec65/bettercallclaude --skill legal-5step-framework

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

End-to-end 5-step Swiss legal pipeline: (1) intake/fact extraction, (2) BGE/statute research, (3) strategy/risk assessment, (4) adversarial stress test, (5) verified document drafting. Trigger when: user asks for full analysis, 'run all steps', 'full pipeline', or 'end-to-end'. Do NOT trigger for: single-step tasks (use individual commands), citation-only work, or translation. Boundary: /workflow runs flexible pipelines; legal-5step is a fixed repeatable sequence.

SKILL.md

6.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

BetterCallClaude 5-Step Legal Framework

You coordinate the BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal pipeline. Five agents run sequentially, each passing structured output to the next, from raw case input through a verified drafted legal document.

Framework

INTAKE → RESEARCH → STRATEGY → ADVERSARIAL → DRAFT
  (1)       (2)        (3)          (4)         (5)

The five steps map to the five cognitive moves on any new Swiss legal matter:

  1. What are the facts and issues?
  2. What does the law say?
  3. What should we do?
  4. Are we right?
  5. How do we say it?

Step Definitions

Step 1: INTAKE

Agent: doc-analyzer | Skill: swiss-legal-research (jurisdiction resolution), privacy-routing

Extracts facts, identifies legal issues, determines jurisdiction and language, flags Anwaltsgeheimnis markers before any external MCP call. Privilege flag propagates through Steps 2–5.

Output:

  • Structured fact list
  • Legal issues ranked by relevance
  • Jurisdiction: federal or cantonal (XX)
  • Language: DE/FR/IT/EN
  • Privilege flag: true/false

Step 2: RESEARCH

Agent: researcher | Skill: swiss-legal-research
MCP servers: swiss-caselaw, bge-search, entscheidsuche, fedlex-sparql, onlinekommentar

Retrieves controlling BGE/ATF/DTF precedents, live statute text, and scholarly commentary. All citations generated via swiss-caselaw:cite — never constructed manually.

Output:

  • Research memorandum with verified citations
  • Statute text retrieved live from fedlex-sparql or swiss-caselaw:get_law
  • Doctrine from onlinekommentar

Citation rule: Every BGE/ATF/DTF reference in Steps 3–5 must appear in this memorandum.

Step 3: STRATEGY

Agent: strategist + risk-analyst | Skill: swiss-legal-strategy
MCP tools: entscheidsuche:analyze_precedent_success_rate, entscheidsuche:find_similar_cases

Converts the research memo into a decision-oriented recommendation with precedent-grounded probability.

Output:

  • Claim strength: Strong / Moderate / Weak
  • Success probability: X% (grounded in analyze_precedent_success_rate)
  • Procedural pathway: ZPO track, forum, timeline
  • Risk matrix: Critical / Moderate / Minor
  • Settlement range and BATNA
  • Recommendation: litigate / settle / ADR

Checkpoint: If success_probability < 30% or any Critical risk — pause, present memo, await confirmation.

Step 4: ADVERSARIAL

Agent: advocate + adversary + judicial-analyst | Skill: adversarial-analysis
MCP tools: swiss-caselaw:find_citations, swiss-caselaw:get_erwaegung, bge-search

Stress-tests the Step 3 strategy through three independent agents before drafting commits the position to paper.

Output:

  • AdvocateReport: strongest case FOR, with BGE support
  • AdversaryReport: systematic challenge with counter-precedents
  • JudicialSynthesis: Erwägung-style balanced conclusion with probability scores
  • strategy_delta: % change from Step 3 estimate

Checkpoint: If strategy_delta > 15% — pause before Step 5, present both estimates, invite strategy revision.

Step 5: DRAFT

Agent: drafter + citation-specialist | Skill: swiss-legal-drafting, swiss-citation-formats
MCP tools: swiss-caselaw:cite, legal-citations (format validation)

Produces the legal document from the confirmed position. No new legal arguments introduced — everything traces to Step 2.

Document selection:

Matter TypeDefault Output
Litigation — plaintiffKlageschrift (ZPO Art. 221)
Litigation — defendantKlageantwort (ZPO Art. 222)
Contract disputeRechtsgutachten
ComplianceAdvisory memorandum
AdvisoryClient letter or memo
CustomAs specified

Citation formats by language:

LanguageBGEArticleParagraph
DEBGE 147 III 265 E. 3.1Art. 97 Abs. 1 ORAbs.
FRATF 147 III 265 consid. 3.1art. 97 al. 1 COal.
ITDTF 147 III 265 consid. 3.1art. 97 cpv. 1 COcpv.
ENBGE 147 III 265 at 3.1Art. 97(1) ORpara.

Data Flow

Step 1  →  facts, issues, jurisdiction, language, privilege_flag
Step 2  →  research memo, verified citations, statute text, doctrine
Step 3  →  strategy memo, success_probability, risk_matrix, recommendation
Step 4  →  judicial synthesis, overall_probability, strategy_delta
Step 5  →  final document (all citations from Step 2 memo)

Quality Gates

GateConditionAction
Privilegeprivilege_flag: truePause before Step 2, confirm MCP calls
Low probabilitysuccess_probability < 30%Pause after Step 3
Strategy deltastrategy_delta > 15%Pause before Step 5
Citation integrityCitation in Step 5 not in Step 2 memoBlock and fetch via MCP

Professional Disclaimer

All pipeline outputs require review and validation by a qualified Swiss lawyer before use. This framework does not constitute legal advice. Lawyers maintain full professional responsibility for all legal work products.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.