Legal 5step framework
Skill fedec65/bettercallclaude/bettercallclaude/skills/legal-5step-framework
A powerful plugin for Claude Cowork Desktop, designed specifically for Swiss legal professionals. 20 agents, 14 skills, and 9 MCP servers — automate research, draft documents, and navigate complex legal landscapes with AI-powered precision.
npx -y skills add fedec65/bettercallclaude --skill legal-5step-frameworkAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
End-to-end 5-step Swiss legal pipeline: (1) intake/fact extraction, (2) BGE/statute research, (3) strategy/risk assessment, (4) adversarial stress test, (5) verified document drafting. Trigger when: user asks for full analysis, 'run all steps', 'full pipeline', or 'end-to-end'. Do NOT trigger for: single-step tasks (use individual commands), citation-only work, or translation. Boundary: /workflow runs flexible pipelines; legal-5step is a fixed repeatable sequence.
SKILL.md
6.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
BetterCallClaude 5-Step Legal Framework
You coordinate the BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal pipeline. Five agents run sequentially, each passing structured output to the next, from raw case input through a verified drafted legal document.
Framework
INTAKE → RESEARCH → STRATEGY → ADVERSARIAL → DRAFT
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
The five steps map to the five cognitive moves on any new Swiss legal matter:
- What are the facts and issues?
- What does the law say?
- What should we do?
- Are we right?
- How do we say it?
Step Definitions
Step 1: INTAKE
Agent: doc-analyzer | Skill: swiss-legal-research (jurisdiction resolution), privacy-routing
Extracts facts, identifies legal issues, determines jurisdiction and language, flags Anwaltsgeheimnis markers before any external MCP call. Privilege flag propagates through Steps 2–5.
Output:
- Structured fact list
- Legal issues ranked by relevance
- Jurisdiction: federal or cantonal (XX)
- Language: DE/FR/IT/EN
- Privilege flag: true/false
Step 2: RESEARCH
Agent: researcher | Skill: swiss-legal-research
MCP servers: swiss-caselaw, bge-search, entscheidsuche, fedlex-sparql, onlinekommentar
Retrieves controlling BGE/ATF/DTF precedents, live statute text, and scholarly commentary. All citations generated via swiss-caselaw:cite — never constructed manually.
Output:
- Research memorandum with verified citations
- Statute text retrieved live from
fedlex-sparqlorswiss-caselaw:get_law - Doctrine from
onlinekommentar
Citation rule: Every BGE/ATF/DTF reference in Steps 3–5 must appear in this memorandum.
Step 3: STRATEGY
Agent: strategist + risk-analyst | Skill: swiss-legal-strategy
MCP tools: entscheidsuche:analyze_precedent_success_rate, entscheidsuche:find_similar_cases
Converts the research memo into a decision-oriented recommendation with precedent-grounded probability.
Output:
- Claim strength: Strong / Moderate / Weak
- Success probability: X% (grounded in
analyze_precedent_success_rate) - Procedural pathway: ZPO track, forum, timeline
- Risk matrix: Critical / Moderate / Minor
- Settlement range and BATNA
- Recommendation: litigate / settle / ADR
Checkpoint: If success_probability < 30% or any Critical risk — pause, present memo, await confirmation.
Step 4: ADVERSARIAL
Agent: advocate + adversary + judicial-analyst | Skill: adversarial-analysis
MCP tools: swiss-caselaw:find_citations, swiss-caselaw:get_erwaegung, bge-search
Stress-tests the Step 3 strategy through three independent agents before drafting commits the position to paper.
Output:
- AdvocateReport: strongest case FOR, with BGE support
- AdversaryReport: systematic challenge with counter-precedents
- JudicialSynthesis: Erwägung-style balanced conclusion with probability scores
- strategy_delta: % change from Step 3 estimate
Checkpoint: If strategy_delta > 15% — pause before Step 5, present both estimates, invite strategy revision.
Step 5: DRAFT
Agent: drafter + citation-specialist | Skill: swiss-legal-drafting, swiss-citation-formats
MCP tools: swiss-caselaw:cite, legal-citations (format validation)
Produces the legal document from the confirmed position. No new legal arguments introduced — everything traces to Step 2.
Document selection:
| Matter Type | Default Output |
|---|---|
| Litigation — plaintiff | Klageschrift (ZPO Art. 221) |
| Litigation — defendant | Klageantwort (ZPO Art. 222) |
| Contract dispute | Rechtsgutachten |
| Compliance | Advisory memorandum |
| Advisory | Client letter or memo |
| Custom | As specified |
Citation formats by language:
| Language | BGE | Article | Paragraph |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE | BGE 147 III 265 E. 3.1 | Art. 97 Abs. 1 OR | Abs. |
| FR | ATF 147 III 265 consid. 3.1 | art. 97 al. 1 CO | al. |
| IT | DTF 147 III 265 consid. 3.1 | art. 97 cpv. 1 CO | cpv. |
| EN | BGE 147 III 265 at 3.1 | Art. 97(1) OR | para. |
Data Flow
Step 1 → facts, issues, jurisdiction, language, privilege_flag
Step 2 → research memo, verified citations, statute text, doctrine
Step 3 → strategy memo, success_probability, risk_matrix, recommendation
Step 4 → judicial synthesis, overall_probability, strategy_delta
Step 5 → final document (all citations from Step 2 memo)
Quality Gates
| Gate | Condition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Privilege | privilege_flag: true | Pause before Step 2, confirm MCP calls |
| Low probability | success_probability < 30% | Pause after Step 3 |
| Strategy delta | strategy_delta > 15% | Pause before Step 5 |
| Citation integrity | Citation in Step 5 not in Step 2 memo | Block and fetch via MCP |
Professional Disclaimer
All pipeline outputs require review and validation by a qualified Swiss lawyer before use. This framework does not constitute legal advice. Lawyers maintain full professional responsibility for all legal work products.