Status reporting
Skill fabioc-aloha/Alex_ACT_Edition/.github/skills/status-reporting
Create stakeholder-friendly project status updates and progress reportsFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_ACT_Edition --skill status-reportingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
6.8 KB, ~1.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Status Reporting Skill
Generate clear, audience-appropriate project status updates. Transform technical progress into stakeholder-friendly communication.
Core Philosophy
"Stakeholders don't need to know HOW you did it β they need to know WHAT it means for them."
Status reports serve different audiences with different needs:
- Executives: Impact, risk, timeline
- Managers: Progress, blockers, resources
- Teams: Details, dependencies, next steps
- Customers: Value delivered, what's coming
Report Templates
Executive Summary (30 seconds)
## Project Status: [Project Name]
**Date**: [Date] | **Status**: π’ On Track / π‘ At Risk / π΄ Blocked
### One-Line Summary
[Single sentence: what happened and what it means]
### Key Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target | Trend |
|--------|---------|--------|-------|
| [Metric 1] | [Value] | [Goal] | β/β/β |
| [Metric 2] | [Value] | [Goal] | β/β/β |
### Decisions Needed
- [ ] [Decision 1 with deadline]
### Timeline Impact
[On schedule / X days ahead / X days behind β why]
Weekly Team Update
## Week of [Date Range]
### Completed β
- [Achievement 1] β [impact]
- [Achievement 2] β [impact]
### In Progress π
- [Task 1] β [% complete, ETA]
- [Task 2] β [% complete, ETA]
### Blocked π«
- [Blocker] β need [resolution] from [who] by [when]
### Next Week Focus
1. [Priority 1]
2. [Priority 2]
3. [Priority 3]
### Metrics
- Velocity: [X] story points
- Bugs: [X] open, [Y] closed
- Coverage: [X]%
### Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Action] |
Stakeholder Email
Subject: [Project] Status β [Date] β [Status Emoji]
Hi [Name],
**Quick Summary**: [One sentence on where we are]
**This Week's Wins**:
β’ [Win 1 β business impact]
β’ [Win 2 β business impact]
**Coming Up**:
β’ [Next milestone] β [Date]
β’ [Key deliverable] β [Date]
**Need Your Input On**:
β’ [Decision needed] β [Context, options, recommendation]
Happy to jump on a call if you have questions.
[Sign-off]
Sprint Retrospective Summary
## Sprint [N] Retrospective
### What Went Well π
- [Positive 1]
- [Positive 2]
### What Could Improve π§
- [Improvement 1]
- [Improvement 2]
### Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due |
|--------|-------|-----|
| [Action] | [Who] | [When] |
### Sprint Metrics
- Planned: [X] points | Completed: [Y] points
- Carry-over: [Z] items
- Team satisfaction: [Score]/5
Audience Adaptation
Language Translation
| Technical Term | Executive Translation |
|---|---|
| "Refactored the authentication module" | "Improved security and login reliability" |
| "Reduced technical debt" | "Reduced maintenance costs and risk" |
| "Implemented CI/CD pipeline" | "Automated our release process β faster, safer updates" |
| "Fixed race condition" | "Resolved intermittent bug causing data issues" |
| "Migrated to microservices" | "Made the system more scalable and reliable" |
Detail Levels
| Audience | Detail Level | Focus On |
|---|---|---|
| C-Suite | Minimal | Business impact, risks, decisions |
| VP/Director | Summary | Progress, resources, timeline |
| Manager | Moderate | Tasks, blockers, team health |
| Team | Detailed | Technical specifics, dependencies |
| Customer | Outcome | Value delivered, what's next |
Status Indicators
Traffic Light System
| Status | Symbol | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green | π’ | On track, no issues | Continue |
| Yellow | π‘ | At risk, needs attention | Monitor closely |
| Red | π΄ | Blocked, needs escalation | Immediate action |
| Blue | π΅ | Complete | Celebrate |
| Gray | βͺ | Not started | Plan |
Trend Indicators
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| β | Improving |
| β | Declining |
| β | Stable |
| β οΈ | Needs attention |
Automation Triggers
When to Generate Status
| Trigger | Report Type |
|---|---|
| End of day Friday | Weekly summary |
| Sprint end | Sprint report |
| Before stakeholder meeting | Executive summary |
| Milestone completion | Achievement update |
| Blocker encountered | Escalation notice |
| User asks "what did we do" | Session/period summary |
Data Sources
Pull information from:
- Git commits and PR descriptions
- Issue tracker (completed, in-progress, blocked)
- Calendar (milestones, deadlines)
- Session history (what we worked on)
- Metrics dashboards (if available)
Best Practices
DO β
- Lead with the most important information
- Use consistent formatting across reports
- Include specific dates and numbers
- Highlight decisions needed
- Acknowledge blockers honestly
- Show progress, not just activity
DON'T β
- Bury bad news
- Use jargon with non-technical audiences
- Include unnecessary detail
- Report activity without outcomes
- Over-promise on timelines
- Skip risk assessment
Session Protocol
Generating a Status Report
- Clarify audience: Who will read this?
- Determine scope: What period? What project?
- Gather data: Commits, issues, conversations
- Identify highlights: What matters most?
- Draft report: Use appropriate template
- Adapt language: Match audience level
- Review for clarity: Can a newcomer understand?
Quick Status Commands
/status β Generate session status
/status weekly β Weekly team update
/status exec β Executive summary
/status email [name] β Stakeholder email draft
Integration Points
Triggers for This Skill
- "status update", "status report"
- "what did we accomplish", "summarize progress"
- "stakeholder update", "email to [stakeholder]"
- "sprint report", "weekly summary"
- End of day/week (proactive)
Metrics
- Clarity score: Can reader understand in 30 seconds?
- Completeness: All sections filled appropriately
- Accuracy: Numbers and dates verified
- Audience fit: Language matches recipient
Would Revise If
Revisit this skill by 2026-08-26 (90 days) or sooner if any of the following fires:
- Stakeholder feedback reports the templates as unclear, jargon-heavy, or missing decisions-needed sections β₯3 times within a quarter
- The audience-adaptation table produces tone mismatches when applied verbatim β₯2 times in observed reports
- Reports generated via these templates consistently bury bad news or miss escalation triggers that surface later as preventable surprises
Good status reports build trust. Great ones prevent surprise.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.