Phase 1 context
Skill exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning/agents/antigravity/.agent/skills/phase-1-context
🏗️ Universal 8-phase methodology for planning and building enterprise-grade, mission-critical software with AI coding agents. Supports Cursor AI, Claude Code, Kimi Code, Windsurf & Google Antigravity. Includes ADR validator, microtask linter & CI/CD templates. ≥99% test coverage. MIT.
npx -y skills add exchanet/method_enterprise_builder_planning --skill phase-1-contextAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Phase 1 — Enterprise Context Analysis (standalone)
SKILL.md
2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Skill: Phase 1 — Enterprise Context Analysis
Purpose
Execute Phase 1 independently: classify the system, map stakeholders, identify regulatory obligations, and list integration points.
When to use
- When starting a new enterprise planning session
- When the user only needs context analysis (not the full 8-phase cycle)
- As a prerequisite before jumping to Phase 3 or Phase 5
Steps
1. System Classification
Ask or infer the classification across 5 dimensions:
| Dimension | Options |
|---|---|
| Grade | Enterprise-grade / Standard |
| Criticality | Mission-critical / Business-critical / Non-critical |
| Availability | HA (99.9%+) / Standard |
| Security | Security-first / Standard |
| Transactions | ACID-required / Eventually consistent / Stateless |
Output:
## System Classification
- [x] Enterprise-grade
- [x] Mission-critical
- [x] High-availability (99.999%)
- [x] Security-first
- [x] ACID-required
2. Stakeholder Map
Identify who cares about this system and what their primary concern is:
| Stakeholder | Role | Key concern |
|---|---|---|
| [Name/role] | End user / Internal / Compliance / Operations / Regulator | [Specific concern] |
3. Regulatory Environment
Map applicable regulations to specific obligations:
| Regulation | Scope | Key obligation |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR | EU personal data | Art. 32: Encryption; Art. 17: Erasure |
| PCI-DSS | Payment card data | Req. 3: No raw PAN; Req. 10: Audit logging |
If no regulations apply, state explicitly: "No regulated data — standard security practices apply."
4. Integration Points
List external systems with protocol and SLA dependency level:
| System | Protocol | SLA dependency |
|---|---|---|
| [System name] | gRPC / REST / Event / SQL | Critical / High / Medium / Low |
Dependency levels:
- Critical: Transaction cannot complete without it
- High: Significant degradation if unavailable
- Medium: Graceful degradation possible
- Low: Fire-and-forget, async
Output artifact
Save as docs/enterprise-context.md. Use Antigravity's createFile operation or @terminal to write.
Gate
Present the classification to the user and ask: "Does this classification match your expectations? Confirm before I proceed to Phase 2."