Deep debug

Skill erkandogan/oh-my-team/skills/deep-debug

Multi-hypothesis parallel debugging with agent teams. Spawns multiple investigators to test competing theories simultaneously. They challenge each other's findings.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add erkandogan/oh-my-team --skill deep-debug

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

17 stars17 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

2.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Deep Debug - Multi-Hypothesis Parallel Investigation

Step 1: Formulate 3-5 hypotheses about the root cause of: "$ARGUMENTS"

Step 2: Create the debug team

TeamCreate(team_name="debug", description="Multi-hypothesis debugging: $ARGUMENTS")

Step 3: Create a task per hypothesis

TaskCreate(subject="Hypothesis 1: [theory]", description="Investigate and find evidence for/against")
TaskCreate(subject="Hypothesis 2: [theory]", description="Investigate and find evidence for/against")
TaskCreate(subject="Hypothesis 3: [theory]", description="Investigate and find evidence for/against")

Step 4: Spawn one investigator per hypothesis

Agent(
  prompt="HYPOTHESIS: [theory 1]
  
  Investigate this theory about: $ARGUMENTS
  1. What evidence would CONFIRM this?
  2. What evidence would DISPROVE this?
  3. Search for both. Don't just confirm.
  4. Share findings with other teammates via SendMessage.
  5. If disproved, say so clearly.",
  subagent_type="explorer",
  team_name="debug",
  name="investigator-1"
)

Agent(
  prompt="HYPOTHESIS: [theory 2] ...",
  subagent_type="explorer",
  team_name="debug",
  name="investigator-2"
)

Agent(
  prompt="HYPOTHESIS: [theory 3] ...",
  subagent_type="explorer",
  team_name="debug",
  name="investigator-3"
)

Step 5: Synthesize findings

After all investigators report, resolve conflicts:

Collect all evidence — confirming AND disconfirming from every investigator
Identify convergence — did multiple investigators independently point to the same root cause?
Resolve contradictions — if investigator-1 says "it's a race condition" and investigator-2 says "it's a null pointer":
- Which has stronger evidence (code paths, stack traces, reproducible steps)?
- Can both be true (multi-cause bug)?
- Spawn an Oracle teammate to adjudicate if evidence is equally strong
Rank hypotheses by surviving evidence: CONFIRMED / LIKELY / DISPROVED
Apply the minimal fix for the highest-ranked confirmed hypothesis
Verify the fix resolves the original bug before reporting completion

NEVER apply fixes for multiple hypotheses simultaneously. Fix one, verify, then address the next if needed.